Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis

Ceri J Phillips, Ioan HumphreysInstitute for Health Research, School of Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UKAbstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young and middle-aged adults, with current prevalence rates estimated to be 3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ceri J Phillips, Ioan Humphreys
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2009-11-01
Series:ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/assessing-cost-effectiveness-in-the-management-of-multiple-sclerosis-a3750
id doaj-a750d1e2235f4c06ab56ea1209242409
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a750d1e2235f4c06ab56ea12092424092020-11-24T23:48:42ZengDove Medical PressClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research1178-69812009-11-012009default6178Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosisCeri J PhillipsIoan HumphreysCeri J Phillips, Ioan HumphreysInstitute for Health Research, School of Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UKAbstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young and middle-aged adults, with current prevalence rates estimated to be 30 per 100,000 populations. Women are approximately twice as susceptible as males, but males are more likely to have progressive disease. The onset of the disease normally occurs between 20 and 40 years of age, with a peak incidence during the late twenties and early thirties, resulting in many years of disability for a large proportion of patients, many of whom require wheelchairs and some nursing home or hospital care. The aim of this study is to update a previous review which considered the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as interferons and glatiramer acetate, with more up to date therapies, such as mitaxantrone hydrochloride and natalizumab in the treatment of MS. The development and availability of new agents has been accompanied byan increased optimism that treatment regimens for MS would be more effective; that the number, severity and duration of relapses would diminish; that disease progression would be delayed; and that disability accumulation would be reduced. However, doubts have been expressed about the effectiveness of these treatments, which has only served to compound the problems associated with endeavors to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of such interventions.Keywords: multiple sclerosis, disease management, immunomodulatory drugs, cost-effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis http://www.dovepress.com/assessing-cost-effectiveness-in-the-management-of-multiple-sclerosis-a3750
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ceri J Phillips
Ioan Humphreys
spellingShingle Ceri J Phillips
Ioan Humphreys
Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
author_facet Ceri J Phillips
Ioan Humphreys
author_sort Ceri J Phillips
title Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
title_short Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
title_full Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
title_sort assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis
publisher Dove Medical Press
series ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
issn 1178-6981
publishDate 2009-11-01
description Ceri J Phillips, Ioan HumphreysInstitute for Health Research, School of Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UKAbstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young and middle-aged adults, with current prevalence rates estimated to be 30 per 100,000 populations. Women are approximately twice as susceptible as males, but males are more likely to have progressive disease. The onset of the disease normally occurs between 20 and 40 years of age, with a peak incidence during the late twenties and early thirties, resulting in many years of disability for a large proportion of patients, many of whom require wheelchairs and some nursing home or hospital care. The aim of this study is to update a previous review which considered the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs), such as interferons and glatiramer acetate, with more up to date therapies, such as mitaxantrone hydrochloride and natalizumab in the treatment of MS. The development and availability of new agents has been accompanied byan increased optimism that treatment regimens for MS would be more effective; that the number, severity and duration of relapses would diminish; that disease progression would be delayed; and that disability accumulation would be reduced. However, doubts have been expressed about the effectiveness of these treatments, which has only served to compound the problems associated with endeavors to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of such interventions.Keywords: multiple sclerosis, disease management, immunomodulatory drugs, cost-effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis
url http://www.dovepress.com/assessing-cost-effectiveness-in-the-management-of-multiple-sclerosis-a3750
work_keys_str_mv AT cerijphillips assessingcosteffectivenessinthemanagementofmultiplesclerosis
AT ioanhumphreys assessingcosteffectivenessinthemanagementofmultiplesclerosis
_version_ 1725485064403288064