Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica

This paper deals with Latin discontinuous nominal expressions (hyperbatons) both by a diachronic perspective internal to Latin (I-VI cent. A.D.) and compared to Romance languages. A nominal expression can be considered discontinuous when its word order is interrupted by one or more elements. In t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iovino, Rossella
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari 2017-09-01
Series:Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale
Subjects:
Online Access:http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/riviste/annali-di-ca-foscari-serie-occidentale/2017/1/interruzione-dellordine-lineare-vs-discontinuita-s/
id doaj-a772aebad17e48689b59c096c087eb11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a772aebad17e48689b59c096c087eb112021-06-02T17:32:20ZdeuEdizioni Ca’ FoscariAnnali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale2499-15622017-09-0151110.14277/2499-1562/AnnOc-51-17-15journal_article_1102Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintatticaIovino, Rossella0Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Italia This paper deals with Latin discontinuous nominal expressions (hyperbatons) both by a diachronic perspective internal to Latin (I-VI cent. A.D.) and compared to Romance languages. A nominal expression can be considered discontinuous when its word order is interrupted by one or more elements. In these cases a violation of the principle of the ‘domain integrity’ takes place. Discontinuity is typical of Latin and sets it apart from Romance languages, in which hyperbatons are not allowed. It is well attested in all phases of Latin so that it is considered one of the most distinctive feature of Latin word order. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that not all linearly discontinuous orders are real hyperbatons. In fact, cases in which the order Modif.-N or N-Modif. is interrupted by the complement of one of the two categories are frequent; in this perspective the domain of hyperbatons results consistently restricted. As regards real hyperbatons, we will propose the following three syntactic configurations: Type 1 due to the extraction of an element within the phrase; Type 2 due to the insertion of a weak element in second position; Type 3 due to the insertion of a verb. A final observation will concern the fact that we find in Latin kinds of hyperbatons that can be considered a clear sign of those that will develop later in Romance because they involve clitics which are absent in Latin. http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/riviste/annali-di-ca-foscari-serie-occidentale/2017/1/interruzione-dellordine-lineare-vs-discontinuita-s/Latin. Nominal syntax. Discontinuity. Word order.
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iovino, Rossella
spellingShingle Iovino, Rossella
Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale
Latin. Nominal syntax. Discontinuity. Word order.
author_facet Iovino, Rossella
author_sort Iovino, Rossella
title Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
title_short Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
title_full Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
title_fullStr Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
title_full_unstemmed Interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
title_sort interruzione dell’ordine lineare vs discontinuità sintattica
publisher Edizioni Ca’ Foscari
series Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale
issn 2499-1562
publishDate 2017-09-01
description This paper deals with Latin discontinuous nominal expressions (hyperbatons) both by a diachronic perspective internal to Latin (I-VI cent. A.D.) and compared to Romance languages. A nominal expression can be considered discontinuous when its word order is interrupted by one or more elements. In these cases a violation of the principle of the ‘domain integrity’ takes place. Discontinuity is typical of Latin and sets it apart from Romance languages, in which hyperbatons are not allowed. It is well attested in all phases of Latin so that it is considered one of the most distinctive feature of Latin word order. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that not all linearly discontinuous orders are real hyperbatons. In fact, cases in which the order Modif.-N or N-Modif. is interrupted by the complement of one of the two categories are frequent; in this perspective the domain of hyperbatons results consistently restricted. As regards real hyperbatons, we will propose the following three syntactic configurations: Type 1 due to the extraction of an element within the phrase; Type 2 due to the insertion of a weak element in second position; Type 3 due to the insertion of a verb. A final observation will concern the fact that we find in Latin kinds of hyperbatons that can be considered a clear sign of those that will develop later in Romance because they involve clitics which are absent in Latin.
topic Latin. Nominal syntax. Discontinuity. Word order.
url http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/riviste/annali-di-ca-foscari-serie-occidentale/2017/1/interruzione-dellordine-lineare-vs-discontinuita-s/
work_keys_str_mv AT iovinorossella interruzionedellordinelinearevsdiscontinuitasintattica
_version_ 1721402652826271744