Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts

Abstract Background Clear aligner therapy has evolved considerably since its introduction 20 years ago. Clinicians have become more experienced with aligner therapy, but little is known about the types of malocclusions that clinicians currently treat with aligners. Similarly, it is not known if view...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsiu-Ching Ko, Weitao Liu, Derek Hou, Sepideh Torkan, Charles Spiekerman, Greg J. Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-07-01
Series:Progress in Orthodontics
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0224-2
id doaj-a7b86a395a8d4f5b85f703346b51f4d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7b86a395a8d4f5b85f703346b51f4d32020-11-24T21:22:36ZengSpringerOpenProgress in Orthodontics2196-10422018-07-011911810.1186/s40510-018-0224-2Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study castsHsiu-Ching Ko0Weitao Liu1Derek Hou2Sepideh Torkan3Charles Spiekerman4Greg J. Huang5Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of WashingtonDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of WashingtonDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of WashingtonDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of WashingtonDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of WashingtonDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of WashingtonAbstract Background Clear aligner therapy has evolved considerably since its introduction 20 years ago. Clinicians have become more experienced with aligner therapy, but little is known about the types of malocclusions that clinicians currently treat with aligners. Similarly, it is not known if viewing digital vs plaster models has any impact on the treatment planning process for aligners. The aim of this study was to assess which types of malocclusions are recommended for treatment with clear aligners, and also to determine if recommendations for aligner treatment differed when using digital versus plaster models. Methods Sixteen orthodontists treatment planned 20 cases at two time points with either the same or different model formats (digital versus plaster). As part of the treatment planning process, they were asked whether each patient was a good candidate for Invisalign® treatment, and if not, why. Generalized estimating equations regression (GEE), the permutation test, and a logistic regression model with GEE were used to analyze the data. Results No significant difference was found between the Invisalign® choices in the digital model group and those in the plaster model group at T1 (p = 0.59). There was no significant difference between the agreement rate of the different formats group and that of the same format group (p = 0.97). Cases with extractions had less Invisalign® recommendations (15%) compared to cases with no extractions (55%) (p = 0.0015). Cases with surgery had less Invisalign® recommendations (29%) compared to cases with no surgery (57%) (p = 0.035). Conclusions In this study, viewing orthodontic records with digital versus plaster models did not influence decisions about Invisalign® recommendations. Additionally, the orthodontists in this study tended to not recommend Invisalign® for extraction cases, surgical cases, or difficult cases.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0224-2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hsiu-Ching Ko
Weitao Liu
Derek Hou
Sepideh Torkan
Charles Spiekerman
Greg J. Huang
spellingShingle Hsiu-Ching Ko
Weitao Liu
Derek Hou
Sepideh Torkan
Charles Spiekerman
Greg J. Huang
Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
Progress in Orthodontics
author_facet Hsiu-Ching Ko
Weitao Liu
Derek Hou
Sepideh Torkan
Charles Spiekerman
Greg J. Huang
author_sort Hsiu-Ching Ko
title Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
title_short Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
title_full Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
title_fullStr Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
title_sort recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts
publisher SpringerOpen
series Progress in Orthodontics
issn 2196-1042
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Abstract Background Clear aligner therapy has evolved considerably since its introduction 20 years ago. Clinicians have become more experienced with aligner therapy, but little is known about the types of malocclusions that clinicians currently treat with aligners. Similarly, it is not known if viewing digital vs plaster models has any impact on the treatment planning process for aligners. The aim of this study was to assess which types of malocclusions are recommended for treatment with clear aligners, and also to determine if recommendations for aligner treatment differed when using digital versus plaster models. Methods Sixteen orthodontists treatment planned 20 cases at two time points with either the same or different model formats (digital versus plaster). As part of the treatment planning process, they were asked whether each patient was a good candidate for Invisalign® treatment, and if not, why. Generalized estimating equations regression (GEE), the permutation test, and a logistic regression model with GEE were used to analyze the data. Results No significant difference was found between the Invisalign® choices in the digital model group and those in the plaster model group at T1 (p = 0.59). There was no significant difference between the agreement rate of the different formats group and that of the same format group (p = 0.97). Cases with extractions had less Invisalign® recommendations (15%) compared to cases with no extractions (55%) (p = 0.0015). Cases with surgery had less Invisalign® recommendations (29%) compared to cases with no surgery (57%) (p = 0.035). Conclusions In this study, viewing orthodontic records with digital versus plaster models did not influence decisions about Invisalign® recommendations. Additionally, the orthodontists in this study tended to not recommend Invisalign® for extraction cases, surgical cases, or difficult cases.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-018-0224-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiuchingko recommendationsforclearalignertherapyusingdigitalorplasterstudycasts
AT weitaoliu recommendationsforclearalignertherapyusingdigitalorplasterstudycasts
AT derekhou recommendationsforclearalignertherapyusingdigitalorplasterstudycasts
AT sepidehtorkan recommendationsforclearalignertherapyusingdigitalorplasterstudycasts
AT charlesspiekerman recommendationsforclearalignertherapyusingdigitalorplasterstudycasts
AT gregjhuang recommendationsforclearalignertherapyusingdigitalorplasterstudycasts
_version_ 1725995194490290176