Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum.
Large-scale genomic analyses of ancient human populations have become feasible partly due to refined sampling methods. The inner part of petrous bones and the cementum layer in teeth roots are currently recognized as the best substrates for such research. We present a comparative analysis of DNA pre...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5271384?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-a7c47c59f9404553bb894507b676054c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a7c47c59f9404553bb894507b676054c2020-11-24T20:45:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e017094010.1371/journal.pone.0170940Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum.Henrik B HansenPeter B DamgaardAshot MargaryanJesper StenderupNiels LynnerupEske WillerslevMorten E AllentoftLarge-scale genomic analyses of ancient human populations have become feasible partly due to refined sampling methods. The inner part of petrous bones and the cementum layer in teeth roots are currently recognized as the best substrates for such research. We present a comparative analysis of DNA preservation in these two substrates obtained from the same human skulls, across a range of different ages and preservation environments. Both substrates display significantly higher endogenous DNA content (average of 16.4% and 40.0% for teeth and petrous bones, respectively) than parietal skull bone (average of 2.2%). Despite sample-to-sample variation, petrous bone overall performs better than tooth cementum (p = 0.001). This difference, however, is driven largely by a cluster of viking skeletons from one particular locality, showing relatively poor molecular tooth preservation (<10% endogenous DNA). In the remaining skeletons there is no systematic difference between the two substrates. A crude preservation (good/bad) applied to each sample prior to DNA-extraction predicted the above/below 10% endogenous DNA threshold in 80% of the cases. Interestingly, we observe signficantly higher levels of cytosine to thymine deamination damage and lower proportions of mitochondrial/nuclear DNA in petrous bone compared to tooth cementum. Lastly, we show that petrous bones from ancient cremated individuals contain no measurable levels of authentic human DNA. Based on these findings we discuss the pros and cons of sampling the different elements.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5271384?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Henrik B Hansen Peter B Damgaard Ashot Margaryan Jesper Stenderup Niels Lynnerup Eske Willerslev Morten E Allentoft |
spellingShingle |
Henrik B Hansen Peter B Damgaard Ashot Margaryan Jesper Stenderup Niels Lynnerup Eske Willerslev Morten E Allentoft Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Henrik B Hansen Peter B Damgaard Ashot Margaryan Jesper Stenderup Niels Lynnerup Eske Willerslev Morten E Allentoft |
author_sort |
Henrik B Hansen |
title |
Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum. |
title_short |
Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum. |
title_full |
Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum. |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Ancient DNA Preservation in Petrous Bone and Tooth Cementum. |
title_sort |
comparing ancient dna preservation in petrous bone and tooth cementum. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Large-scale genomic analyses of ancient human populations have become feasible partly due to refined sampling methods. The inner part of petrous bones and the cementum layer in teeth roots are currently recognized as the best substrates for such research. We present a comparative analysis of DNA preservation in these two substrates obtained from the same human skulls, across a range of different ages and preservation environments. Both substrates display significantly higher endogenous DNA content (average of 16.4% and 40.0% for teeth and petrous bones, respectively) than parietal skull bone (average of 2.2%). Despite sample-to-sample variation, petrous bone overall performs better than tooth cementum (p = 0.001). This difference, however, is driven largely by a cluster of viking skeletons from one particular locality, showing relatively poor molecular tooth preservation (<10% endogenous DNA). In the remaining skeletons there is no systematic difference between the two substrates. A crude preservation (good/bad) applied to each sample prior to DNA-extraction predicted the above/below 10% endogenous DNA threshold in 80% of the cases. Interestingly, we observe signficantly higher levels of cytosine to thymine deamination damage and lower proportions of mitochondrial/nuclear DNA in petrous bone compared to tooth cementum. Lastly, we show that petrous bones from ancient cremated individuals contain no measurable levels of authentic human DNA. Based on these findings we discuss the pros and cons of sampling the different elements. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5271384?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT henrikbhansen comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum AT peterbdamgaard comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum AT ashotmargaryan comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum AT jesperstenderup comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum AT nielslynnerup comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum AT eskewillerslev comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum AT morteneallentoft comparingancientdnapreservationinpetrousboneandtoothcementum |
_version_ |
1716815477623226368 |