The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda
Over the past few months, COVID-19 has ravaged health systems and economies in countries across the world. While many would argue that a pandemic of respiratory disease was predictable, the systematic failures of the response came as a surprise. From the shortage of hospital beds and medical equipme...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00700-x |
id |
doaj-a7c60e31f4fb42a5b9b5b9f180bf0b8e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a7c60e31f4fb42a5b9b5b9f180bf0b8e2021-01-24T12:05:40ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922021-01-01811610.1057/s41599-020-00700-xThe COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agendaN. Jensen0A. H. Kelly1M. Avendano2Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College LondonDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College LondonDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College LondonOver the past few months, COVID-19 has ravaged health systems and economies in countries across the world. While many would argue that a pandemic of respiratory disease was predictable, the systematic failures of the response came as a surprise. From the shortage of hospital beds and medical equipment to the gross insufficiencies in national surveillance systems, supply chains and laboratory capacity, COVID-19 has laid bare the health care limitations that ‘global north’ and ‘global south’ share. A stark set of differences, however, run across the parallels in our collective predicament: indeed, what has become ever-more apparent is the radically uneven distribution of the health, social and economic risks associated with the pandemic—and the public health measures implemented in response—both within and between societies. As concerns grow over a prolonged period of COVID-19 waves, further insights are needed into who bears the largest share of COVID-19 burden and why. The pursuit of health equity is widely held to be global health’s raison d’être; and yet, the deep inequities laid bare by the current pandemic underscore that the field must do more and we must do better. This article identifies five key domains for equity research and action going forward. These ‘equity frontiers’ are not meant to be exhaustive. Rather our emphasis here is on drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic as a prompt for a revived—if not rethought—equity agenda for an evolving global health field.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00700-x |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
N. Jensen A. H. Kelly M. Avendano |
spellingShingle |
N. Jensen A. H. Kelly M. Avendano The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
author_facet |
N. Jensen A. H. Kelly M. Avendano |
author_sort |
N. Jensen |
title |
The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda |
title_short |
The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda |
title_full |
The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda |
title_fullStr |
The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda |
title_full_unstemmed |
The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda |
title_sort |
covid-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda |
publisher |
Springer Nature |
series |
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
issn |
2662-9992 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Over the past few months, COVID-19 has ravaged health systems and economies in countries across the world. While many would argue that a pandemic of respiratory disease was predictable, the systematic failures of the response came as a surprise. From the shortage of hospital beds and medical equipment to the gross insufficiencies in national surveillance systems, supply chains and laboratory capacity, COVID-19 has laid bare the health care limitations that ‘global north’ and ‘global south’ share. A stark set of differences, however, run across the parallels in our collective predicament: indeed, what has become ever-more apparent is the radically uneven distribution of the health, social and economic risks associated with the pandemic—and the public health measures implemented in response—both within and between societies. As concerns grow over a prolonged period of COVID-19 waves, further insights are needed into who bears the largest share of COVID-19 burden and why. The pursuit of health equity is widely held to be global health’s raison d’être; and yet, the deep inequities laid bare by the current pandemic underscore that the field must do more and we must do better. This article identifies five key domains for equity research and action going forward. These ‘equity frontiers’ are not meant to be exhaustive. Rather our emphasis here is on drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic as a prompt for a revived—if not rethought—equity agenda for an evolving global health field. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00700-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT njensen thecovid19pandemicunderscorestheneedforanequityfocusedglobalhealthagenda AT ahkelly thecovid19pandemicunderscorestheneedforanequityfocusedglobalhealthagenda AT mavendano thecovid19pandemicunderscorestheneedforanequityfocusedglobalhealthagenda AT njensen covid19pandemicunderscorestheneedforanequityfocusedglobalhealthagenda AT ahkelly covid19pandemicunderscorestheneedforanequityfocusedglobalhealthagenda AT mavendano covid19pandemicunderscorestheneedforanequityfocusedglobalhealthagenda |
_version_ |
1724326418967429120 |