Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.

Tibetia and Gueldenstaedtia are two morphologically similar and small genera in Fabaceae, with distributions largely corresponding to the Sino-Himalayan and Sino-Japanese subkingdoms in eastern Asia, respectively. These two genera have confusing relationships based on morphology; therefore, we aimed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yan-Ping Xie, Ying Meng, Hang Sun, Ze-Long Nie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5025100?pdf=render
id doaj-a7ce28a8e30f483c952cec25c2acc9c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7ce28a8e30f483c952cec25c2acc9c62020-11-25T02:15:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016298210.1371/journal.pone.0162982Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.Yan-Ping XieYing MengHang SunZe-Long NieTibetia and Gueldenstaedtia are two morphologically similar and small genera in Fabaceae, with distributions largely corresponding to the Sino-Himalayan and Sino-Japanese subkingdoms in eastern Asia, respectively. These two genera have confusing relationships based on morphology; therefore, we aimed to provide a clear understanding of their phylogenetic and biogeographic evolution within eastern Asia. In our investigations we included 88 samples representing five Gueldenstaedtia species, five Tibetia species, and outgroup species were sequenced using five markers (nuclear: ITS; chloroplast: matK, trnL-F, psbA-trnH and rbcL). Our phylogenetic results support (1) the monophyly of Tibetia and of Gueldenstaedtia, respectively; and (2) that Tibetia and Gueldenstaedtia are sister genera. Additionally, our data identified that Tibetia species had much higher sequence variation than Gueldenstaedtia species. Our results suggest that the two genera were separated from each other about 17.23 million years ago, which is congruent with the Himalayan orogeny and the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau in the mid Miocene. The divergence of Tibetia and Gueldenstaedtia is strongly supported by the separation of the Sino-Himalayan and Sino-Japanese region within eastern Asia. In addition, the habitat heterogeneity may accelerate the molecular divergence of Tibetia in the Sino-Himalayan region.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5025100?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yan-Ping Xie
Ying Meng
Hang Sun
Ze-Long Nie
spellingShingle Yan-Ping Xie
Ying Meng
Hang Sun
Ze-Long Nie
Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yan-Ping Xie
Ying Meng
Hang Sun
Ze-Long Nie
author_sort Yan-Ping Xie
title Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.
title_short Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.
title_full Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.
title_fullStr Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Phylogeny of Gueldenstaedtia and Tibetia (Fabaceae) and Their Biogeographic Differentiation within Eastern Asia.
title_sort molecular phylogeny of gueldenstaedtia and tibetia (fabaceae) and their biogeographic differentiation within eastern asia.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Tibetia and Gueldenstaedtia are two morphologically similar and small genera in Fabaceae, with distributions largely corresponding to the Sino-Himalayan and Sino-Japanese subkingdoms in eastern Asia, respectively. These two genera have confusing relationships based on morphology; therefore, we aimed to provide a clear understanding of their phylogenetic and biogeographic evolution within eastern Asia. In our investigations we included 88 samples representing five Gueldenstaedtia species, five Tibetia species, and outgroup species were sequenced using five markers (nuclear: ITS; chloroplast: matK, trnL-F, psbA-trnH and rbcL). Our phylogenetic results support (1) the monophyly of Tibetia and of Gueldenstaedtia, respectively; and (2) that Tibetia and Gueldenstaedtia are sister genera. Additionally, our data identified that Tibetia species had much higher sequence variation than Gueldenstaedtia species. Our results suggest that the two genera were separated from each other about 17.23 million years ago, which is congruent with the Himalayan orogeny and the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau in the mid Miocene. The divergence of Tibetia and Gueldenstaedtia is strongly supported by the separation of the Sino-Himalayan and Sino-Japanese region within eastern Asia. In addition, the habitat heterogeneity may accelerate the molecular divergence of Tibetia in the Sino-Himalayan region.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5025100?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yanpingxie molecularphylogenyofgueldenstaedtiaandtibetiafabaceaeandtheirbiogeographicdifferentiationwithineasternasia
AT yingmeng molecularphylogenyofgueldenstaedtiaandtibetiafabaceaeandtheirbiogeographicdifferentiationwithineasternasia
AT hangsun molecularphylogenyofgueldenstaedtiaandtibetiafabaceaeandtheirbiogeographicdifferentiationwithineasternasia
AT zelongnie molecularphylogenyofgueldenstaedtiaandtibetiafabaceaeandtheirbiogeographicdifferentiationwithineasternasia
_version_ 1724896516439539712