Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations

Past studies have indicated that multiple factors may influence sport referees' decisions, such as pressure from spectators and athletes' reputation. Grounded in the social impact theory framework, this study examined whether Norwegian Premier League (NPL) referees are biased by a team...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Kjeøen Erikstad, Bjørn Tore Johansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fspor.2020.00019/full
id doaj-a7f5c6b526fb446e81f6bd2c4e74afc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7f5c6b526fb446e81f6bd2c4e74afc02020-11-25T02:09:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sports and Active Living2624-93672020-02-01210.3389/fspor.2020.00019506826Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty SituationsMartin Kjeøen Erikstad0Bjørn Tore Johansen1Faculty of Education and Arts, Nord University, Bodø, NorwayDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, NorwayPast studies have indicated that multiple factors may influence sport referees' decisions, such as pressure from spectators and athletes' reputation. Grounded in the social impact theory framework, this study examined whether Norwegian Premier League (NPL) referees are biased by a team's success when awarding penalties. Using video footage (similar to video assistant referees), an expert panel (EP) of four NPL referees evaluated all potential penalty situations (N = 43) involving either of two successful teams during an entire NPL season. Fifty-five potential penalty situations from matches without successful teams were also rated. Overall, the match referees identified 73.3% (22 of 30) of the EP-identified penalties during matches without successful teams. Successful teams were awarded 110% (11 of 10) of the EP-identified penalties, while their opponents were awarded 12.5% (1 of 8). Chi square statistic revealed that successful teams were more likely to receive an incorrect penalty compared with their opponents, and less likely to be denied a penalty they should have been awarded. These findings indicate that referees' decisions may be unintentionally biased by a team's success, extending our knowledge about how football referees may be influenced by social forces.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fspor.2020.00019/fullreferee biassocial influencepenalty decisionsteam successfootball
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Kjeøen Erikstad
Bjørn Tore Johansen
spellingShingle Martin Kjeøen Erikstad
Bjørn Tore Johansen
Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
referee bias
social influence
penalty decisions
team success
football
author_facet Martin Kjeøen Erikstad
Bjørn Tore Johansen
author_sort Martin Kjeøen Erikstad
title Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations
title_short Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations
title_full Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations
title_fullStr Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations
title_full_unstemmed Referee Bias in Professional Football: Favoritism Toward Successful Teams in Potential Penalty Situations
title_sort referee bias in professional football: favoritism toward successful teams in potential penalty situations
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
issn 2624-9367
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Past studies have indicated that multiple factors may influence sport referees' decisions, such as pressure from spectators and athletes' reputation. Grounded in the social impact theory framework, this study examined whether Norwegian Premier League (NPL) referees are biased by a team's success when awarding penalties. Using video footage (similar to video assistant referees), an expert panel (EP) of four NPL referees evaluated all potential penalty situations (N = 43) involving either of two successful teams during an entire NPL season. Fifty-five potential penalty situations from matches without successful teams were also rated. Overall, the match referees identified 73.3% (22 of 30) of the EP-identified penalties during matches without successful teams. Successful teams were awarded 110% (11 of 10) of the EP-identified penalties, while their opponents were awarded 12.5% (1 of 8). Chi square statistic revealed that successful teams were more likely to receive an incorrect penalty compared with their opponents, and less likely to be denied a penalty they should have been awarded. These findings indicate that referees' decisions may be unintentionally biased by a team's success, extending our knowledge about how football referees may be influenced by social forces.
topic referee bias
social influence
penalty decisions
team success
football
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fspor.2020.00019/full
work_keys_str_mv AT martinkjeøenerikstad refereebiasinprofessionalfootballfavoritismtowardsuccessfulteamsinpotentialpenaltysituations
AT bjørntorejohansen refereebiasinprofessionalfootballfavoritismtowardsuccessfulteamsinpotentialpenaltysituations
_version_ 1724921331460341760