Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources

The environmental impacts analysis for water transfers are lacking. In this study, the impacts on ecosystem equality and resources due to physical and virtual water transfers were evaluated for the Hetao irrigation district, China. Results indicate: about 4.50×109 m3 of water transferred from the Ye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu Jing, Wang Yubao, Luan Xiaobo, Yu Zhongbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601070
id doaj-a7f7528165994a92aeab64c335a12a86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7f7528165994a92aeab64c335a12a862021-03-02T11:03:42ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-012460107010.1051/matecconf/201824601070matecconf_iswso2018_01070Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resourcesLiu JingWang Yubao0Luan Xiaobo1Yu ZhongboInstitute of Water-saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F UniversityInstitute of Water-saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F UniversityThe environmental impacts analysis for water transfers are lacking. In this study, the impacts on ecosystem equality and resources due to physical and virtual water transfers were evaluated for the Hetao irrigation district, China. Results indicate: about 4.50×109 m3 of water transferred from the Yellow River to the Hetao irrigation district during 2001-2010 and 2.92×109 m3 water was flowed out from this district virtually simultaneously. The impacts of physical, virtual and net water inflow on ecosystem quality were 1.33×109 m2·yr (positive), 867.60×106 m2·yr (negative) and 465.70×106 m2·yr (positive). The impacts on resources were 28.16×109 MJ (positive) for physical water, 18.26×109 MJ (negative) for virtual water and 9.89×109 MJ (positive) for net water transfer. The environmental influences were more significant for middle areas. The flows of physical and virtual water have increased water stress in some already water scare regions. The increase of physical water flow-in in this district would be difficult due to high financial cost, while the increase of virtual water flow-in could be possible measures to relieve environmental influences. However, others factors such as the social or economic factors should also be consideredhttps://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601070
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liu Jing
Wang Yubao
Luan Xiaobo
Yu Zhongbo
spellingShingle Liu Jing
Wang Yubao
Luan Xiaobo
Yu Zhongbo
Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Liu Jing
Wang Yubao
Luan Xiaobo
Yu Zhongbo
author_sort Liu Jing
title Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
title_short Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
title_full Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
title_fullStr Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
title_full_unstemmed Physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
title_sort physical and virtual water transfers and the impacts on regional ecosystem quality and resources
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The environmental impacts analysis for water transfers are lacking. In this study, the impacts on ecosystem equality and resources due to physical and virtual water transfers were evaluated for the Hetao irrigation district, China. Results indicate: about 4.50×109 m3 of water transferred from the Yellow River to the Hetao irrigation district during 2001-2010 and 2.92×109 m3 water was flowed out from this district virtually simultaneously. The impacts of physical, virtual and net water inflow on ecosystem quality were 1.33×109 m2·yr (positive), 867.60×106 m2·yr (negative) and 465.70×106 m2·yr (positive). The impacts on resources were 28.16×109 MJ (positive) for physical water, 18.26×109 MJ (negative) for virtual water and 9.89×109 MJ (positive) for net water transfer. The environmental influences were more significant for middle areas. The flows of physical and virtual water have increased water stress in some already water scare regions. The increase of physical water flow-in in this district would be difficult due to high financial cost, while the increase of virtual water flow-in could be possible measures to relieve environmental influences. However, others factors such as the social or economic factors should also be considered
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601070
work_keys_str_mv AT liujing physicalandvirtualwatertransfersandtheimpactsonregionalecosystemqualityandresources
AT wangyubao physicalandvirtualwatertransfersandtheimpactsonregionalecosystemqualityandresources
AT luanxiaobo physicalandvirtualwatertransfersandtheimpactsonregionalecosystemqualityandresources
AT yuzhongbo physicalandvirtualwatertransfersandtheimpactsonregionalecosystemqualityandresources
_version_ 1724235587694624768