A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) and frailty often co-exist, and frailty in HF results in a poor prognosis. However, in Asian populations, prognostic criteria are needed to examine the effect of frailty on HF. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide cohort study to develop frailty-based prognosti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumio Yamada, Takuji Adachi, Hideo Izawa, Toyoaki Murohara, Takaaki Kondo, on behalf of the FLAGSHIP collaborators
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-08-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y
id doaj-a7f85304ac1444b19748d6e1aa824cc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7f85304ac1444b19748d6e1aa824cc02020-11-25T03:17:07ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612018-08-011811710.1186/s12872-018-0897-yA multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and designSumio Yamada0Takuji Adachi1Hideo Izawa2Toyoaki Murohara3Takaaki Kondo4on behalf of the FLAGSHIP collaboratorsDepartment of Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University Banbuntane Hotokukai HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Health Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineAbstract Background Heart failure (HF) and frailty often co-exist, and frailty in HF results in a poor prognosis. However, in Asian populations, prognostic criteria are needed to examine the effect of frailty on HF. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in HF patients (FLAGSHIP). FLAGSHIP mainly aims to 1) develop the frailty criteria based on HF-specific outcomes, 2) propose a hypothesis of the potential mechanisms of frailty manifestations in HF, and 3) examine the effects of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation on frailty. Methods In this prospective study, we consecutively enroll ambulatory patients admitted because of acute HF or exacerbation of HF and elderly patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (age ≥ 70 years). They will be followed up for 2 years to assess frailty and hard clinical events. The primary endpoints of FLAGSHIP are cardiac events including cardiac mortality and HF-related readmission after discharge. Secondary endpoints are readmissions because of fracture or pneumonia and all-cause mortality. We used clinical data, including the items related to the frailty phenotype to develop diagnostic criteria for frailty and known prognostic factors of HF. Cognitive function, depression, and anorexia are also considered as potential components of frailty. As of March 2018, 2650 patients (85% was patients admitted for HF) have been registered from 30 collaborating hospitals nationwide in Japan. Discussion FLAGSHIP provides diagnostic criteria and fundamental information on frailty manifestations to develop the best practices for the long-term management of HF. Diagnostic criteria on frailty developed by FLAGSHIP is expected to become a novel indicator for the stratification of patients at risk to functional decline after medical or surgical treatment, and in turn to contribute to the best practices in the long-term management of HF.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-018-0897-yHeart failureFrailtyDiagnostic criteriaMulticenter cohort studyJapan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumio Yamada
Takuji Adachi
Hideo Izawa
Toyoaki Murohara
Takaaki Kondo
on behalf of the FLAGSHIP collaborators
spellingShingle Sumio Yamada
Takuji Adachi
Hideo Izawa
Toyoaki Murohara
Takaaki Kondo
on behalf of the FLAGSHIP collaborators
A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Heart failure
Frailty
Diagnostic criteria
Multicenter cohort study
Japan
author_facet Sumio Yamada
Takuji Adachi
Hideo Izawa
Toyoaki Murohara
Takaaki Kondo
on behalf of the FLAGSHIP collaborators
author_sort Sumio Yamada
title A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_short A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_full A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_fullStr A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_sort multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (flagship): rationale and design
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) and frailty often co-exist, and frailty in HF results in a poor prognosis. However, in Asian populations, prognostic criteria are needed to examine the effect of frailty on HF. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in HF patients (FLAGSHIP). FLAGSHIP mainly aims to 1) develop the frailty criteria based on HF-specific outcomes, 2) propose a hypothesis of the potential mechanisms of frailty manifestations in HF, and 3) examine the effects of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation on frailty. Methods In this prospective study, we consecutively enroll ambulatory patients admitted because of acute HF or exacerbation of HF and elderly patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (age ≥ 70 years). They will be followed up for 2 years to assess frailty and hard clinical events. The primary endpoints of FLAGSHIP are cardiac events including cardiac mortality and HF-related readmission after discharge. Secondary endpoints are readmissions because of fracture or pneumonia and all-cause mortality. We used clinical data, including the items related to the frailty phenotype to develop diagnostic criteria for frailty and known prognostic factors of HF. Cognitive function, depression, and anorexia are also considered as potential components of frailty. As of March 2018, 2650 patients (85% was patients admitted for HF) have been registered from 30 collaborating hospitals nationwide in Japan. Discussion FLAGSHIP provides diagnostic criteria and fundamental information on frailty manifestations to develop the best practices for the long-term management of HF. Diagnostic criteria on frailty developed by FLAGSHIP is expected to become a novel indicator for the stratification of patients at risk to functional decline after medical or surgical treatment, and in turn to contribute to the best practices in the long-term management of HF.
topic Heart failure
Frailty
Diagnostic criteria
Multicenter cohort study
Japan
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sumioyamada amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT takujiadachi amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT hideoizawa amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT toyoakimurohara amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT takaakikondo amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT onbehalfoftheflagshipcollaborators amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT sumioyamada multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT takujiadachi multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT hideoizawa multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT toyoakimurohara multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT takaakikondo multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT onbehalfoftheflagshipcollaborators multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
_version_ 1724633259101388800