Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
Abstract Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these eff...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633 |
id |
doaj-a83b27eb14b8494795636006162cebae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a83b27eb14b8494795636006162cebae2021-03-02T08:17:36ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582018-01-018141643410.1002/ece3.3633Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchardLeonardo Montagnani0Damiano Zanotelli1Massimo Tagliavini2Enrico Tomelleri3Faculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyThe European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC) Bolzano ItalyAbstract Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hampers our capability to represent them in empirical‐ or process‐based models. Here we explore, using an apple orchard ecosystem in the North of Italy as a simplified case study, how the considered timescale impacts the relative importance of the single environmental variables in explaining observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET). Using 6 years of eddy covariance and meteorological information as input data, we found a decay of the relative importance of the modeling capability of photosynthetically active radiation in explaining both NEE and ET moving from half‐hourly to seasonal timescale and an increase in the relative importance of air temperature (T) and VPD. Satellite NDVI, used as proxy of leaf development, added little improvement to overall modeling capability. Increasing the timescale, the number of variables needed for parameterization decreased (from 5 to 1), while the proportion of variance explained by the model increased (r2 from 0.56–0.78 to 0.85–0.90 for NEE and ET respectively). The wavelet coherence and the phase analyses showed that the two variables that increased their relative importance when the scale increased (T, VPD) were not in phase at the correlation peak of both ET and NEE. This phase shift in the time domain corresponds to a hysteretic response in the meteorological variables domain. This work confirms that the model parameterization should be performed using parameters calculated at the appropriate scale. It suggests that in managed ecosystems, where the interannual variability is minimized by the agronomic practices, the use of timescales large enough to include hysteretic and delayed responses reduces the number of required input variables and improves their explanatory capacity.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633environmental constraintsevapotranspirationhysteresismodelingnet ecosystem exchangephase |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leonardo Montagnani Damiano Zanotelli Massimo Tagliavini Enrico Tomelleri |
spellingShingle |
Leonardo Montagnani Damiano Zanotelli Massimo Tagliavini Enrico Tomelleri Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard Ecology and Evolution environmental constraints evapotranspiration hysteresis modeling net ecosystem exchange phase |
author_facet |
Leonardo Montagnani Damiano Zanotelli Massimo Tagliavini Enrico Tomelleri |
author_sort |
Leonardo Montagnani |
title |
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard |
title_short |
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard |
title_full |
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard |
title_fullStr |
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard |
title_full_unstemmed |
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard |
title_sort |
timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Ecology and Evolution |
issn |
2045-7758 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hampers our capability to represent them in empirical‐ or process‐based models. Here we explore, using an apple orchard ecosystem in the North of Italy as a simplified case study, how the considered timescale impacts the relative importance of the single environmental variables in explaining observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET). Using 6 years of eddy covariance and meteorological information as input data, we found a decay of the relative importance of the modeling capability of photosynthetically active radiation in explaining both NEE and ET moving from half‐hourly to seasonal timescale and an increase in the relative importance of air temperature (T) and VPD. Satellite NDVI, used as proxy of leaf development, added little improvement to overall modeling capability. Increasing the timescale, the number of variables needed for parameterization decreased (from 5 to 1), while the proportion of variance explained by the model increased (r2 from 0.56–0.78 to 0.85–0.90 for NEE and ET respectively). The wavelet coherence and the phase analyses showed that the two variables that increased their relative importance when the scale increased (T, VPD) were not in phase at the correlation peak of both ET and NEE. This phase shift in the time domain corresponds to a hysteretic response in the meteorological variables domain. This work confirms that the model parameterization should be performed using parameters calculated at the appropriate scale. It suggests that in managed ecosystems, where the interannual variability is minimized by the agronomic practices, the use of timescales large enough to include hysteretic and delayed responses reduces the number of required input variables and improves their explanatory capacity. |
topic |
environmental constraints evapotranspiration hysteresis modeling net ecosystem exchange phase |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leonardomontagnani timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard AT damianozanotelli timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard AT massimotagliavini timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard AT enricotomelleri timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard |
_version_ |
1724240652662734848 |