Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard

Abstract Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonardo Montagnani, Damiano Zanotelli, Massimo Tagliavini, Enrico Tomelleri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633
id doaj-a83b27eb14b8494795636006162cebae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a83b27eb14b8494795636006162cebae2021-03-02T08:17:36ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582018-01-018141643410.1002/ece3.3633Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchardLeonardo Montagnani0Damiano Zanotelli1Massimo Tagliavini2Enrico Tomelleri3Faculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyThe European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC) Bolzano ItalyAbstract Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hampers our capability to represent them in empirical‐ or process‐based models. Here we explore, using an apple orchard ecosystem in the North of Italy as a simplified case study, how the considered timescale impacts the relative importance of the single environmental variables in explaining observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET). Using 6 years of eddy covariance and meteorological information as input data, we found a decay of the relative importance of the modeling capability of photosynthetically active radiation in explaining both NEE and ET moving from half‐hourly to seasonal timescale and an increase in the relative importance of air temperature (T) and VPD. Satellite NDVI, used as proxy of leaf development, added little improvement to overall modeling capability. Increasing the timescale, the number of variables needed for parameterization decreased (from 5 to 1), while the proportion of variance explained by the model increased (r2 from 0.56–0.78 to 0.85–0.90 for NEE and ET respectively). The wavelet coherence and the phase analyses showed that the two variables that increased their relative importance when the scale increased (T, VPD) were not in phase at the correlation peak of both ET and NEE. This phase shift in the time domain corresponds to a hysteretic response in the meteorological variables domain. This work confirms that the model parameterization should be performed using parameters calculated at the appropriate scale. It suggests that in managed ecosystems, where the interannual variability is minimized by the agronomic practices, the use of timescales large enough to include hysteretic and delayed responses reduces the number of required input variables and improves their explanatory capacity.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633environmental constraintsevapotranspirationhysteresismodelingnet ecosystem exchangephase
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonardo Montagnani
Damiano Zanotelli
Massimo Tagliavini
Enrico Tomelleri
spellingShingle Leonardo Montagnani
Damiano Zanotelli
Massimo Tagliavini
Enrico Tomelleri
Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
Ecology and Evolution
environmental constraints
evapotranspiration
hysteresis
modeling
net ecosystem exchange
phase
author_facet Leonardo Montagnani
Damiano Zanotelli
Massimo Tagliavini
Enrico Tomelleri
author_sort Leonardo Montagnani
title Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_short Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_full Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_fullStr Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_full_unstemmed Timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
title_sort timescale effects on the environmental control of carbon and water fluxes of an apple orchard
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Abstract Model parameterization and validation of earth–atmosphere interactions are generally performed using a single timescale (e.g., nearly instantaneous, daily, and annual), although both delayed responses and hysteretic effects have been widely recognized. The lack of consideration of these effects hampers our capability to represent them in empirical‐ or process‐based models. Here we explore, using an apple orchard ecosystem in the North of Italy as a simplified case study, how the considered timescale impacts the relative importance of the single environmental variables in explaining observed net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and evapotranspiration (ET). Using 6 years of eddy covariance and meteorological information as input data, we found a decay of the relative importance of the modeling capability of photosynthetically active radiation in explaining both NEE and ET moving from half‐hourly to seasonal timescale and an increase in the relative importance of air temperature (T) and VPD. Satellite NDVI, used as proxy of leaf development, added little improvement to overall modeling capability. Increasing the timescale, the number of variables needed for parameterization decreased (from 5 to 1), while the proportion of variance explained by the model increased (r2 from 0.56–0.78 to 0.85–0.90 for NEE and ET respectively). The wavelet coherence and the phase analyses showed that the two variables that increased their relative importance when the scale increased (T, VPD) were not in phase at the correlation peak of both ET and NEE. This phase shift in the time domain corresponds to a hysteretic response in the meteorological variables domain. This work confirms that the model parameterization should be performed using parameters calculated at the appropriate scale. It suggests that in managed ecosystems, where the interannual variability is minimized by the agronomic practices, the use of timescales large enough to include hysteretic and delayed responses reduces the number of required input variables and improves their explanatory capacity.
topic environmental constraints
evapotranspiration
hysteresis
modeling
net ecosystem exchange
phase
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3633
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardomontagnani timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
AT damianozanotelli timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
AT massimotagliavini timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
AT enricotomelleri timescaleeffectsontheenvironmentalcontrolofcarbonandwaterfluxesofanappleorchard
_version_ 1724240652662734848