Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.

This study investigates the quantitative bacterial recovery of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in nasal screenings by utilizing dry or moistened swabs within an in vivo and an in vitro experimental setting. 135 nasal MRSA carriers were each swabbed in one nostril with a dry and in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philipp Warnke, Annette Devide, Mirjam Weise, Hagen Frickmann, Norbert Georg Schwarz, Holger Schäffler, Peter Ottl, Andreas Podbielski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5023121?pdf=render
id doaj-a87bb58930ea4d079da38ef7622c5ec7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a87bb58930ea4d079da38ef7622c5ec72020-11-25T02:12:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016307310.1371/journal.pone.0163073Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.Philipp WarnkeAnnette DevideMirjam WeiseHagen FrickmannNorbert Georg SchwarzHolger SchäfflerPeter OttlAndreas PodbielskiThis study investigates the quantitative bacterial recovery of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in nasal screenings by utilizing dry or moistened swabs within an in vivo and an in vitro experimental setting. 135 nasal MRSA carriers were each swabbed in one nostril with a dry and in the other one with a moistened rayon swab. Quantitative bacterial recovery was measured by standard viable count techniques. Furthermore, an anatomically correct artificial nose model was inoculated with a numerically defined suspension of MRSA and swabbed with dry and moistened rayon, polyurethane-foam and nylon-flocked swabs to test these different settings and swab-materials under identical laboratory conditions. In vivo, quantities of MRSA per nostril in carriers varied between <101 and >107 colony forming units, with a median of 2.15x104 CFU. However, no statistically significant differences could be detected for the recovery of MRSA quantities when swabbing nasal carriers with moist or dry rayon swabs. In vitro testing confirmed the in vivo data for swabs with rayon, polyurethane and nylon-flocked tips, since pre-moistening of swabs did not significantly affect the quantities of retrieved bacteria. Therefore, pre-moistening of swabs prior to nasal MRSA sampling provides no advantage in terms of recovering greater bacterial quantities and therefore can be omitted. In addition, this situation can be mimicked in an in vitro model, thereby providing a useful basis for future in vitro testings of new swab types or target organisms for screening approaches.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5023121?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philipp Warnke
Annette Devide
Mirjam Weise
Hagen Frickmann
Norbert Georg Schwarz
Holger Schäffler
Peter Ottl
Andreas Podbielski
spellingShingle Philipp Warnke
Annette Devide
Mirjam Weise
Hagen Frickmann
Norbert Georg Schwarz
Holger Schäffler
Peter Ottl
Andreas Podbielski
Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Philipp Warnke
Annette Devide
Mirjam Weise
Hagen Frickmann
Norbert Georg Schwarz
Holger Schäffler
Peter Ottl
Andreas Podbielski
author_sort Philipp Warnke
title Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.
title_short Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.
title_full Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.
title_fullStr Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing Moist or Dry Swabs for the Sampling of Nasal MRSA Carriers? An In Vivo and In Vitro Study.
title_sort utilizing moist or dry swabs for the sampling of nasal mrsa carriers? an in vivo and in vitro study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This study investigates the quantitative bacterial recovery of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in nasal screenings by utilizing dry or moistened swabs within an in vivo and an in vitro experimental setting. 135 nasal MRSA carriers were each swabbed in one nostril with a dry and in the other one with a moistened rayon swab. Quantitative bacterial recovery was measured by standard viable count techniques. Furthermore, an anatomically correct artificial nose model was inoculated with a numerically defined suspension of MRSA and swabbed with dry and moistened rayon, polyurethane-foam and nylon-flocked swabs to test these different settings and swab-materials under identical laboratory conditions. In vivo, quantities of MRSA per nostril in carriers varied between <101 and >107 colony forming units, with a median of 2.15x104 CFU. However, no statistically significant differences could be detected for the recovery of MRSA quantities when swabbing nasal carriers with moist or dry rayon swabs. In vitro testing confirmed the in vivo data for swabs with rayon, polyurethane and nylon-flocked tips, since pre-moistening of swabs did not significantly affect the quantities of retrieved bacteria. Therefore, pre-moistening of swabs prior to nasal MRSA sampling provides no advantage in terms of recovering greater bacterial quantities and therefore can be omitted. In addition, this situation can be mimicked in an in vitro model, thereby providing a useful basis for future in vitro testings of new swab types or target organisms for screening approaches.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5023121?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT philippwarnke utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT annettedevide utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT mirjamweise utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT hagenfrickmann utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT norbertgeorgschwarz utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT holgerschaffler utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT peterottl utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
AT andreaspodbielski utilizingmoistordryswabsforthesamplingofnasalmrsacarriersaninvivoandinvitrostudy
_version_ 1724909407964233728