Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant

Background: Prevention from caries is a principle in dentistry and fissure sealant therapy is being used as a preventive method success of sealants is directly depending on their retention. Aim: The Aim of the present study is to evaluate effects of enamel preparation on sealant retention. Settings...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Askarizadeh Nahid, Babaee G Zahra, Rezvani Yasaman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=380;epage=382;aulast=Nahid
id doaj-a88a86b7deb54617b87ea6d4976a5f22
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a88a86b7deb54617b87ea6d4976a5f222020-11-25T00:44:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612012-01-013438038210.4103/0976-237X.107418Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealantAskarizadeh NahidBabaee G ZahraRezvani YasamanBackground: Prevention from caries is a principle in dentistry and fissure sealant therapy is being used as a preventive method success of sealants is directly depending on their retention. Aim: The Aim of the present study is to evaluate effects of enamel preparation on sealant retention. Settings and Design: Clinical trial Materials and Methods: About 57 children aged 6-8 year old took part in this study. 200 first molar teeth of these children has been randomly separated into two groups: A case group (Mechanically preparation of enamel) and a control group (conventional method, without preparation). After applying fissure sealants children were followed up 6 months later. Statistical Analysis Used: Mann- U- Whitney Test was used. Results: Complete retention after 6 month follow up was 86.7% in case group and 82.8% in control group. No significant difference was seen between the groups after 6 month follow up. ( P = 0.508). Conclusion: Although statistical evaluation didn′t show significant difference, but sealant retention was more after preparation technique.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=380;epage=382;aulast=NahidFissure sealantmechanical preparationretention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Askarizadeh Nahid
Babaee G Zahra
Rezvani Yasaman
spellingShingle Askarizadeh Nahid
Babaee G Zahra
Rezvani Yasaman
Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Fissure sealant
mechanical preparation
retention
author_facet Askarizadeh Nahid
Babaee G Zahra
Rezvani Yasaman
author_sort Askarizadeh Nahid
title Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
title_short Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
title_full Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
title_fullStr Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
title_sort evaluation of the effect of enamel preparation on retention rate of fissure sealant
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
issn 0976-237X
0976-2361
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: Prevention from caries is a principle in dentistry and fissure sealant therapy is being used as a preventive method success of sealants is directly depending on their retention. Aim: The Aim of the present study is to evaluate effects of enamel preparation on sealant retention. Settings and Design: Clinical trial Materials and Methods: About 57 children aged 6-8 year old took part in this study. 200 first molar teeth of these children has been randomly separated into two groups: A case group (Mechanically preparation of enamel) and a control group (conventional method, without preparation). After applying fissure sealants children were followed up 6 months later. Statistical Analysis Used: Mann- U- Whitney Test was used. Results: Complete retention after 6 month follow up was 86.7% in case group and 82.8% in control group. No significant difference was seen between the groups after 6 month follow up. ( P = 0.508). Conclusion: Although statistical evaluation didn′t show significant difference, but sealant retention was more after preparation technique.
topic Fissure sealant
mechanical preparation
retention
url http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=380;epage=382;aulast=Nahid
work_keys_str_mv AT askarizadehnahid evaluationoftheeffectofenamelpreparationonretentionrateoffissuresealant
AT babaeegzahra evaluationoftheeffectofenamelpreparationonretentionrateoffissuresealant
AT rezvaniyasaman evaluationoftheeffectofenamelpreparationonretentionrateoffissuresealant
_version_ 1725275587211165696