Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold

Abstract A 62‐year‐old man with Brugada syndrome underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. The lead was positioned along the left sternal border and defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed. However, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was not terminated with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasushi Wakabayashi, Takeshi Mitsuhashi, Hideo Fujita, Shin‐ichi Momomura
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12145
id doaj-a8a2d19fb80b444b83807af8263ba38e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8a2d19fb80b444b83807af8263ba38e2020-11-25T01:34:38ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482019-02-0135113313510.1002/joa3.12145Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation thresholdYasushi Wakabayashi0Takeshi Mitsuhashi1Hideo Fujita2Shin‐ichi Momomura3Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama JapanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University Saitama JapanAbstract A 62‐year‐old man with Brugada syndrome underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. The lead was positioned along the left sternal border and defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed. However, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was not terminated with 65 J and 80 J shocks. Shock impedance was 82 ohms. We repositioned the lead to the right sternal border and performed DFT testing again, followed by the VF termination with a 65 J shock. Shock impedance was 59 ohms. The positional relationship among the lead, generator, and heart was changed by lead repositioning, which may have contributed to improved shock impedance and DFT.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12145Brugada syndromehigh defibrillation thresholdshock impedancesubcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillatorventricular fibrillation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yasushi Wakabayashi
Takeshi Mitsuhashi
Hideo Fujita
Shin‐ichi Momomura
spellingShingle Yasushi Wakabayashi
Takeshi Mitsuhashi
Hideo Fujita
Shin‐ichi Momomura
Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
Journal of Arrhythmia
Brugada syndrome
high defibrillation threshold
shock impedance
subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
ventricular fibrillation
author_facet Yasushi Wakabayashi
Takeshi Mitsuhashi
Hideo Fujita
Shin‐ichi Momomura
author_sort Yasushi Wakabayashi
title Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
title_short Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
title_full Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
title_fullStr Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
title_sort usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Arrhythmia
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract A 62‐year‐old man with Brugada syndrome underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. The lead was positioned along the left sternal border and defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed. However, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was not terminated with 65 J and 80 J shocks. Shock impedance was 82 ohms. We repositioned the lead to the right sternal border and performed DFT testing again, followed by the VF termination with a 65 J shock. Shock impedance was 59 ohms. The positional relationship among the lead, generator, and heart was changed by lead repositioning, which may have contributed to improved shock impedance and DFT.
topic Brugada syndrome
high defibrillation threshold
shock impedance
subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
ventricular fibrillation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12145
work_keys_str_mv AT yasushiwakabayashi usefulnessofleadrepositioningfromlefttorightsternalborderforapatientwithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshowinghighdefibrillationthreshold
AT takeshimitsuhashi usefulnessofleadrepositioningfromlefttorightsternalborderforapatientwithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshowinghighdefibrillationthreshold
AT hideofujita usefulnessofleadrepositioningfromlefttorightsternalborderforapatientwithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshowinghighdefibrillationthreshold
AT shinichimomomura usefulnessofleadrepositioningfromlefttorightsternalborderforapatientwithsubcutaneousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorshowinghighdefibrillationthreshold
_version_ 1725070691166846976