Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity

<p>Recently, it has been established that interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) can dramatically affect both trapped electron fluxes in the outer radiation belt and precipitating electron fluxes lost from the belt into the atmosphere. Precipitating electron fluxes and energies can vary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. George, E. Kilpua, A. Osmane, T. Asikainen, M. M. H. Kalliokoski, C. J. Rodger, S. Dubyagin, M. Palmroth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-08-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/38/931/2020/angeo-38-931-2020.pdf
id doaj-a8b5f3ec519d4db29ab9f9529616edc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8b5f3ec519d4db29ab9f9529616edc32020-11-25T03:57:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762020-08-013893195110.5194/angeo-38-931-2020Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarityH. George0E. Kilpua1A. Osmane2T. Asikainen3M. M. H. Kalliokoski4C. J. Rodger5S. Dubyagin6M. Palmroth7Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Physics, University of Oulu, Oulu, FinlandDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Physics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandFinnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland<p>Recently, it has been established that interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) can dramatically affect both trapped electron fluxes in the outer radiation belt and precipitating electron fluxes lost from the belt into the atmosphere. Precipitating electron fluxes and energies can vary over a range of timescales during these events. These variations depend on the initial energy and location of the electron population and the ICME characteristics and structures. One important factor controlling electron dynamics is the magnetic field orientation within the ejecta that is an integral part of the ICME. In this study, we examine Van Allen Probes (RBSPs) and Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites (POESs) data to explore trapped and precipitating electron fluxes during two ICMEs. The ejecta in the selected ICMEs have magnetic cloud characteristics that exhibit the opposite sense of the rotation of the north–south magnetic field component (<span class="inline-formula"><i>B</i><sub><i>Z</i></sub></span>). RBSP data are used to study trapped electron fluxes in situ, while POES data are used for electron fluxes precipitating into the upper atmosphere. The trapped and precipitating electron fluxes are qualitatively analysed to understand their variation in relation to each other and to the magnetic cloud rotation during these events. Inner magnetospheric wave activity was also estimated using RBSP and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) data. In each event, the largest changes in the location and magnitude of both the trapped and precipitating electron fluxes occurred during the southward portion of the magnetic cloud. Significant changes also occurred during the end of the sheath and at the sheath–ejecta boundary for the cloud with south to north magnetic field rotation, while the ICME with north to south rotation had significant changes at the end boundary of the cloud. The sense of rotation of <span class="inline-formula"><i>B</i><sub><i>Z</i></sub></span> and its profile also clearly affects the coherence of the trapped and/or precipitating flux changes, timing of variations with respect to the ICME structures, and flux magnitude of different electron populations. The differing electron responses could therefore imply partly different dominant acceleration mechanisms acting on the outer radiation belt electron populations as a result of opposite magnetic cloud rotation.</p>https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/38/931/2020/angeo-38-931-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. George
E. Kilpua
A. Osmane
T. Asikainen
M. M. H. Kalliokoski
C. J. Rodger
S. Dubyagin
M. Palmroth
spellingShingle H. George
E. Kilpua
A. Osmane
T. Asikainen
M. M. H. Kalliokoski
C. J. Rodger
S. Dubyagin
M. Palmroth
Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet H. George
E. Kilpua
A. Osmane
T. Asikainen
M. M. H. Kalliokoski
C. J. Rodger
S. Dubyagin
M. Palmroth
author_sort H. George
title Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
title_short Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
title_full Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
title_fullStr Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
title_full_unstemmed Outer Van Allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
title_sort outer van allen belt trapped and precipitating electron flux responses to two interplanetary magnetic clouds of opposite polarity
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2020-08-01
description <p>Recently, it has been established that interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) can dramatically affect both trapped electron fluxes in the outer radiation belt and precipitating electron fluxes lost from the belt into the atmosphere. Precipitating electron fluxes and energies can vary over a range of timescales during these events. These variations depend on the initial energy and location of the electron population and the ICME characteristics and structures. One important factor controlling electron dynamics is the magnetic field orientation within the ejecta that is an integral part of the ICME. In this study, we examine Van Allen Probes (RBSPs) and Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites (POESs) data to explore trapped and precipitating electron fluxes during two ICMEs. The ejecta in the selected ICMEs have magnetic cloud characteristics that exhibit the opposite sense of the rotation of the north–south magnetic field component (<span class="inline-formula"><i>B</i><sub><i>Z</i></sub></span>). RBSP data are used to study trapped electron fluxes in situ, while POES data are used for electron fluxes precipitating into the upper atmosphere. The trapped and precipitating electron fluxes are qualitatively analysed to understand their variation in relation to each other and to the magnetic cloud rotation during these events. Inner magnetospheric wave activity was also estimated using RBSP and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) data. In each event, the largest changes in the location and magnitude of both the trapped and precipitating electron fluxes occurred during the southward portion of the magnetic cloud. Significant changes also occurred during the end of the sheath and at the sheath–ejecta boundary for the cloud with south to north magnetic field rotation, while the ICME with north to south rotation had significant changes at the end boundary of the cloud. The sense of rotation of <span class="inline-formula"><i>B</i><sub><i>Z</i></sub></span> and its profile also clearly affects the coherence of the trapped and/or precipitating flux changes, timing of variations with respect to the ICME structures, and flux magnitude of different electron populations. The differing electron responses could therefore imply partly different dominant acceleration mechanisms acting on the outer radiation belt electron populations as a result of opposite magnetic cloud rotation.</p>
url https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/38/931/2020/angeo-38-931-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hgeorge outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT ekilpua outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT aosmane outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT tasikainen outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT mmhkalliokoski outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT cjrodger outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT sdubyagin outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
AT mpalmroth outervanallenbelttrappedandprecipitatingelectronfluxresponsestotwointerplanetarymagneticcloudsofoppositepolarity
_version_ 1724459959138123776