Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles

In this study, we analyzed a subset of uncited or low cited articles from the data reported in Arnesen, Hveem, Short, West, and Barbour  (2019), who examined the trends in K-12 online learning articles from 1994 to 2016. We identified 62 articles that had 5 or fewer citations, and analyzed them for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karen Arnesen, Shea Walters, Michael K. Barbour, Jered Borup
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Online Learning Consortium 2020-06-01
Series:Online Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2080
id doaj-a8bbc22df32b4577b502cf93d8f140e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8bbc22df32b4577b502cf93d8f140e12020-11-25T03:48:49ZengOnline Learning ConsortiumOnline Learning2472-57492472-57302020-06-0124210.24059/olj.v24i2.2080858Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articlesKaren Arnesen0Shea Walters1Michael K. Barbour2Jered Borup3Brigham Young UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityTouro University CaliforniaGeorge Mason UniversityIn this study, we analyzed a subset of uncited or low cited articles from the data reported in Arnesen, Hveem, Short, West, and Barbour  (2019), who examined the trends in K-12 online learning articles from 1994 to 2016. We identified 62 articles that had 5 or fewer citations, and analyzed them for trends in authorship, publication outlets, dates of publication, and topics that could help explain their low citation numbers. We also analyzed topics to see what contribution they might have made and can still make to the field of K-12 online learning. We found that the majority of these articles had been published in many different, less well-known journals.  We also found that these articles may have attracted fewer readers because they addressed topics that seemed to have a narrow focus, often outside of the United States. The articles were also authored by  both well-known researchers in the field as well as a number of one-time authors. What we did not find were articles that were uninteresting, poorly researched, or irrelevant. Many of the articles described and discussed programs that grappled with and overcame some of the same challenges online learning still faces today: issues of interaction, community, technology, management, etc. Some of the early articles gave interesting insights into the history of K-12 online learning, especially as it involved rural learners and programs. Others addressed less mainstream but still interesting topics such as librarians in online learning, cross-border AP history classes, policies that helped or hindered the growth of online learning, and practical considerations of cost and access.https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2080k-12, k-12 online learning, virtual school, cyber school, journal analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen Arnesen
Shea Walters
Michael K. Barbour
Jered Borup
spellingShingle Karen Arnesen
Shea Walters
Michael K. Barbour
Jered Borup
Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles
Online Learning
k-12, k-12 online learning, virtual school, cyber school, journal analysis
author_facet Karen Arnesen
Shea Walters
Michael K. Barbour
Jered Borup
author_sort Karen Arnesen
title Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles
title_short Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles
title_full Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles
title_fullStr Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles
title_full_unstemmed Irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? Trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited K-12 online learning articles
title_sort irrelevant, overlooked, or lost? trends in 20 years of uncited and low cited k-12 online learning articles
publisher Online Learning Consortium
series Online Learning
issn 2472-5749
2472-5730
publishDate 2020-06-01
description In this study, we analyzed a subset of uncited or low cited articles from the data reported in Arnesen, Hveem, Short, West, and Barbour  (2019), who examined the trends in K-12 online learning articles from 1994 to 2016. We identified 62 articles that had 5 or fewer citations, and analyzed them for trends in authorship, publication outlets, dates of publication, and topics that could help explain their low citation numbers. We also analyzed topics to see what contribution they might have made and can still make to the field of K-12 online learning. We found that the majority of these articles had been published in many different, less well-known journals.  We also found that these articles may have attracted fewer readers because they addressed topics that seemed to have a narrow focus, often outside of the United States. The articles were also authored by  both well-known researchers in the field as well as a number of one-time authors. What we did not find were articles that were uninteresting, poorly researched, or irrelevant. Many of the articles described and discussed programs that grappled with and overcame some of the same challenges online learning still faces today: issues of interaction, community, technology, management, etc. Some of the early articles gave interesting insights into the history of K-12 online learning, especially as it involved rural learners and programs. Others addressed less mainstream but still interesting topics such as librarians in online learning, cross-border AP history classes, policies that helped or hindered the growth of online learning, and practical considerations of cost and access.
topic k-12, k-12 online learning, virtual school, cyber school, journal analysis
url https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/2080
work_keys_str_mv AT karenarnesen irrelevantoverlookedorlosttrendsin20yearsofuncitedandlowcitedk12onlinelearningarticles
AT sheawalters irrelevantoverlookedorlosttrendsin20yearsofuncitedandlowcitedk12onlinelearningarticles
AT michaelkbarbour irrelevantoverlookedorlosttrendsin20yearsofuncitedandlowcitedk12onlinelearningarticles
AT jeredborup irrelevantoverlookedorlosttrendsin20yearsofuncitedandlowcitedk12onlinelearningarticles
_version_ 1724497001323692032