Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations

Introduction: Temporomandibular joint dislocation is described as the movement of mandibular condyle out of the fossa beyond its anatomical and functional boundaries causing pain and discomfort. It is often managed by conservative methods, but in long-standing, chronic conditions, surgical treatment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S M Balaji, Preetha Balaji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2018;volume=29;issue=4;spage=455;epage=458;aulast=Balaji
id doaj-a8e831739cd149d2a5d21dfcabeec0e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8e831739cd149d2a5d21dfcabeec0e32020-11-24T21:27:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032018-01-0129445545810.4103/ijdr.IJDR_493_18Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocationsS M BalajiPreetha BalajiIntroduction: Temporomandibular joint dislocation is described as the movement of mandibular condyle out of the fossa beyond its anatomical and functional boundaries causing pain and discomfort. It is often managed by conservative methods, but in long-standing, chronic conditions, surgical treatment is the only option. The goal of surgical treatment is to reposition the condyle and prevent further recurrences. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis involving a single center and a surgeon with 19 patients and 23 joint surgeries performed over a 10-year period. Patients who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria and had earlier undergone surgical correction with hook-shaped miniplates and miniscrews fixed with or without bone grafts formed the study group. Results: In all, 12 were female (mean age, 41.9 ± 12.07 years) and the rest 9 were male (mean age, 39.8 ± 13.6 years), ranging from 32 years to 58 years. All patients had the dislocation for an average period of 19.26 ± 12.6 months before the surgery. The mean maximal mouth opening (without pain) preoperatively was 17.78 ± 2.13 mm (12–25 mm) while postoperatively it was 32.28 ± 3.17 mm (27–37 mm). There were no immediate or late surgical complications in the follow-up period that ranged from 8 to 37 months. Discussion: When proper case selection is employed and properly done, using hook-shaped miniplates with or without bone graft is more cost-effective, giving excellent short- and long-term effects. Conclusion: The results in this Indian population are very similar to that reported from other parts of the world.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2018;volume=29;issue=4;spage=455;epage=458;aulast=BalajiHook-shaped miniplatesIndiajoint dislocationpseudarthrosis of temporomandibular jointtemporomandibular joint dislocationtemporomandibular joint pain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S M Balaji
Preetha Balaji
spellingShingle S M Balaji
Preetha Balaji
Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Hook-shaped miniplates
India
joint dislocation
pseudarthrosis of temporomandibular joint
temporomandibular joint dislocation
temporomandibular joint pain
author_facet S M Balaji
Preetha Balaji
author_sort S M Balaji
title Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
title_short Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
title_full Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
title_fullStr Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
title_full_unstemmed Surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
title_sort surgical management of chronic temporomandibular joint dislocations
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Introduction: Temporomandibular joint dislocation is described as the movement of mandibular condyle out of the fossa beyond its anatomical and functional boundaries causing pain and discomfort. It is often managed by conservative methods, but in long-standing, chronic conditions, surgical treatment is the only option. The goal of surgical treatment is to reposition the condyle and prevent further recurrences. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis involving a single center and a surgeon with 19 patients and 23 joint surgeries performed over a 10-year period. Patients who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria and had earlier undergone surgical correction with hook-shaped miniplates and miniscrews fixed with or without bone grafts formed the study group. Results: In all, 12 were female (mean age, 41.9 ± 12.07 years) and the rest 9 were male (mean age, 39.8 ± 13.6 years), ranging from 32 years to 58 years. All patients had the dislocation for an average period of 19.26 ± 12.6 months before the surgery. The mean maximal mouth opening (without pain) preoperatively was 17.78 ± 2.13 mm (12–25 mm) while postoperatively it was 32.28 ± 3.17 mm (27–37 mm). There were no immediate or late surgical complications in the follow-up period that ranged from 8 to 37 months. Discussion: When proper case selection is employed and properly done, using hook-shaped miniplates with or without bone graft is more cost-effective, giving excellent short- and long-term effects. Conclusion: The results in this Indian population are very similar to that reported from other parts of the world.
topic Hook-shaped miniplates
India
joint dislocation
pseudarthrosis of temporomandibular joint
temporomandibular joint dislocation
temporomandibular joint pain
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2018;volume=29;issue=4;spage=455;epage=458;aulast=Balaji
work_keys_str_mv AT smbalaji surgicalmanagementofchronictemporomandibularjointdislocations
AT preethabalaji surgicalmanagementofchronictemporomandibularjointdislocations
_version_ 1725975837451223040