Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review

Abstract Background Angioplasty is a fundamental treatment for atherosclerotic disease in the cardiac, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular beds. However, the optimal duration of balloon inflation has not been identified. Our study will investigate whether prolonged angioplasty balloon inflation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Rockley, Prasad Jetty, George Wells, Kathleen Rockley, Dean Fergusson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-0955-2
id doaj-a9209f85d6404659b5e4bd65ecd634ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9209f85d6404659b5e4bd65ecd634ba2020-11-25T00:27:35ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532019-02-01811710.1186/s13643-019-0955-2Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic reviewMark Rockley0Prasad Jetty1George Wells2Kathleen Rockley3Dean Fergusson4Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital - Civic CampusDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital - Civic CampusCardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart InstituteDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital - Civic CampusClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteAbstract Background Angioplasty is a fundamental treatment for atherosclerotic disease in the cardiac, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular beds. However, the optimal duration of balloon inflation has not been identified. Our study will investigate whether prolonged angioplasty balloon inflation of at least 1 min duration, when compared with brief inflation, affects residual stenosis after arterial angioplasty. Methods In compliance with PRISMA, two independent reviewers will conduct a systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, trial registries, grey literature, and ancestry and citation search. Data abstraction, quantitative, and quantitative meta-analysis will be performed according to pre-specified criteria. The primary outcome is residual stenosis immediately after initial angioplasty; however, secondary outcomes will include multiple short and long term pre-specific clinical and radiographic outcomes. Risk of bias, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses are planned. Discussion Despite the ubiquitous use of angioplasty in atherosclerotic disease and multiple trials investigating the ideal balloon inflation duration, there are no systematic reviews evaluating prolonged angioplasty balloon inflation. Currently synthesized evidence is insufficient to confidently direct clinical decision-making, and the current variation in operator preference of balloon angioplasty duration suggests ongoing clinical equipoise. Given the known availability of current primary evidence, our study intends to synthesize the evidence and guide future clinical decision making and investigation. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018092702http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-0955-2AngioplastyDurationProlongedRestenosisArterial patency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Rockley
Prasad Jetty
George Wells
Kathleen Rockley
Dean Fergusson
spellingShingle Mark Rockley
Prasad Jetty
George Wells
Kathleen Rockley
Dean Fergusson
Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
Systematic Reviews
Angioplasty
Duration
Prolonged
Restenosis
Arterial patency
author_facet Mark Rockley
Prasad Jetty
George Wells
Kathleen Rockley
Dean Fergusson
author_sort Mark Rockley
title Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort prolonged versus brief balloon inflation during arterial angioplasty for de novo atherosclerotic disease: protocol for a systematic review
publisher BMC
series Systematic Reviews
issn 2046-4053
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract Background Angioplasty is a fundamental treatment for atherosclerotic disease in the cardiac, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular beds. However, the optimal duration of balloon inflation has not been identified. Our study will investigate whether prolonged angioplasty balloon inflation of at least 1 min duration, when compared with brief inflation, affects residual stenosis after arterial angioplasty. Methods In compliance with PRISMA, two independent reviewers will conduct a systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, trial registries, grey literature, and ancestry and citation search. Data abstraction, quantitative, and quantitative meta-analysis will be performed according to pre-specified criteria. The primary outcome is residual stenosis immediately after initial angioplasty; however, secondary outcomes will include multiple short and long term pre-specific clinical and radiographic outcomes. Risk of bias, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses are planned. Discussion Despite the ubiquitous use of angioplasty in atherosclerotic disease and multiple trials investigating the ideal balloon inflation duration, there are no systematic reviews evaluating prolonged angioplasty balloon inflation. Currently synthesized evidence is insufficient to confidently direct clinical decision-making, and the current variation in operator preference of balloon angioplasty duration suggests ongoing clinical equipoise. Given the known availability of current primary evidence, our study intends to synthesize the evidence and guide future clinical decision making and investigation. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018092702
topic Angioplasty
Duration
Prolonged
Restenosis
Arterial patency
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-0955-2
work_keys_str_mv AT markrockley prolongedversusbriefballooninflationduringarterialangioplastyfordenovoatheroscleroticdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT prasadjetty prolongedversusbriefballooninflationduringarterialangioplastyfordenovoatheroscleroticdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT georgewells prolongedversusbriefballooninflationduringarterialangioplastyfordenovoatheroscleroticdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT kathleenrockley prolongedversusbriefballooninflationduringarterialangioplastyfordenovoatheroscleroticdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
AT deanfergusson prolongedversusbriefballooninflationduringarterialangioplastyfordenovoatheroscleroticdiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview
_version_ 1725338865856675840