An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI

The aims of this paper were to compare (1) the proportion of participants diagnosed with threshold or subthreshold Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) (clinical utility), and (2) the severity of participants’ clinical features and mental Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marly Amorim Palavras, Phillipa Hay, Angélica Claudino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-11-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/11/1751
id doaj-a925edc29afe4f32867ee1b113ec86f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a925edc29afe4f32867ee1b113ec86f62020-11-24T20:57:00ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432018-11-011011175110.3390/nu10111751nu10111751An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMIMarly Amorim Palavras0Phillipa Hay1Angélica Claudino2Eating Disorders Program (PROATA), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04017030, BrazilTranslational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney 2751, AustraliaEating Disorders Program (PROATA), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04017030, BrazilThe aims of this paper were to compare (1) the proportion of participants diagnosed with threshold or subthreshold Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) (clinical utility), and (2) the severity of participants’ clinical features and mental Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (convergent validity), when diagnosed according to either the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—5th edition (DSM-5) or the proposed International Classification of Diseases 11th edition (ICD-11) schemes. One hundred and seven adult men and women, with a high Body Mass Index (BMI) were evaluated by interview to confirm their eating disorder diagnoses. All participants completed self-report assessments of current symptoms and mental HRQoL. The majority of participants in either diagnostic scheme were included in the main categories of BN or BED (102/107, 95% in the ICD-11 and 85/107, 79% in the DSM-5). Fewer individuals received a subthreshold other or unspecified diagnosis with the ICD-11 compared to the DSM-5 scheme (5% vs. 21%). No significant differences in demographic, clinical features or mental HRQoL of participants with complete or partial BN or BED were found between diagnostic categories. Compared to the DSM-5, the proposed ICD-11 was not over inclusive, i.e., it did not appear to include people with less severe and potentially less clinically relevant symptoms. These results support the greater clinical utility of the ICD-11 whilst both schemes showed convergent validity.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/11/1751Bulimia Nervosabinge-eating disorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersInternational Classification of Diseases
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marly Amorim Palavras
Phillipa Hay
Angélica Claudino
spellingShingle Marly Amorim Palavras
Phillipa Hay
Angélica Claudino
An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
Nutrients
Bulimia Nervosa
binge-eating disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
International Classification of Diseases
author_facet Marly Amorim Palavras
Phillipa Hay
Angélica Claudino
author_sort Marly Amorim Palavras
title An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
title_short An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
title_full An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
title_fullStr An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
title_full_unstemmed An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
title_sort investigation of the clinical utility of the proposed icd-11 and dsm-5 diagnostic schemes for eating disorders characterized by recurrent binge eating in people with a high bmi
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2018-11-01
description The aims of this paper were to compare (1) the proportion of participants diagnosed with threshold or subthreshold Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) (clinical utility), and (2) the severity of participants’ clinical features and mental Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (convergent validity), when diagnosed according to either the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—5th edition (DSM-5) or the proposed International Classification of Diseases 11th edition (ICD-11) schemes. One hundred and seven adult men and women, with a high Body Mass Index (BMI) were evaluated by interview to confirm their eating disorder diagnoses. All participants completed self-report assessments of current symptoms and mental HRQoL. The majority of participants in either diagnostic scheme were included in the main categories of BN or BED (102/107, 95% in the ICD-11 and 85/107, 79% in the DSM-5). Fewer individuals received a subthreshold other or unspecified diagnosis with the ICD-11 compared to the DSM-5 scheme (5% vs. 21%). No significant differences in demographic, clinical features or mental HRQoL of participants with complete or partial BN or BED were found between diagnostic categories. Compared to the DSM-5, the proposed ICD-11 was not over inclusive, i.e., it did not appear to include people with less severe and potentially less clinically relevant symptoms. These results support the greater clinical utility of the ICD-11 whilst both schemes showed convergent validity.
topic Bulimia Nervosa
binge-eating disorder
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
International Classification of Diseases
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/11/1751
work_keys_str_mv AT marlyamorimpalavras aninvestigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi
AT phillipahay aninvestigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi
AT angelicaclaudino aninvestigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi
AT marlyamorimpalavras investigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi
AT phillipahay investigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi
AT angelicaclaudino investigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi
_version_ 1716789066670800896