An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI
The aims of this paper were to compare (1) the proportion of participants diagnosed with threshold or subthreshold Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) (clinical utility), and (2) the severity of participants’ clinical features and mental Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQ...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/11/1751 |
id |
doaj-a925edc29afe4f32867ee1b113ec86f6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a925edc29afe4f32867ee1b113ec86f62020-11-24T20:57:00ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432018-11-011011175110.3390/nu10111751nu10111751An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMIMarly Amorim Palavras0Phillipa Hay1Angélica Claudino2Eating Disorders Program (PROATA), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04017030, BrazilTranslational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney 2751, AustraliaEating Disorders Program (PROATA), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04017030, BrazilThe aims of this paper were to compare (1) the proportion of participants diagnosed with threshold or subthreshold Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) (clinical utility), and (2) the severity of participants’ clinical features and mental Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (convergent validity), when diagnosed according to either the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—5th edition (DSM-5) or the proposed International Classification of Diseases 11th edition (ICD-11) schemes. One hundred and seven adult men and women, with a high Body Mass Index (BMI) were evaluated by interview to confirm their eating disorder diagnoses. All participants completed self-report assessments of current symptoms and mental HRQoL. The majority of participants in either diagnostic scheme were included in the main categories of BN or BED (102/107, 95% in the ICD-11 and 85/107, 79% in the DSM-5). Fewer individuals received a subthreshold other or unspecified diagnosis with the ICD-11 compared to the DSM-5 scheme (5% vs. 21%). No significant differences in demographic, clinical features or mental HRQoL of participants with complete or partial BN or BED were found between diagnostic categories. Compared to the DSM-5, the proposed ICD-11 was not over inclusive, i.e., it did not appear to include people with less severe and potentially less clinically relevant symptoms. These results support the greater clinical utility of the ICD-11 whilst both schemes showed convergent validity.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/11/1751Bulimia Nervosabinge-eating disorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersInternational Classification of Diseases |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marly Amorim Palavras Phillipa Hay Angélica Claudino |
spellingShingle |
Marly Amorim Palavras Phillipa Hay Angélica Claudino An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI Nutrients Bulimia Nervosa binge-eating disorder Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders International Classification of Diseases |
author_facet |
Marly Amorim Palavras Phillipa Hay Angélica Claudino |
author_sort |
Marly Amorim Palavras |
title |
An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI |
title_short |
An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI |
title_full |
An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI |
title_fullStr |
An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Investigation of the Clinical Utility of the Proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 Diagnostic Schemes for Eating Disorders Characterized by Recurrent Binge Eating in People with a High BMI |
title_sort |
investigation of the clinical utility of the proposed icd-11 and dsm-5 diagnostic schemes for eating disorders characterized by recurrent binge eating in people with a high bmi |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nutrients |
issn |
2072-6643 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
The aims of this paper were to compare (1) the proportion of participants diagnosed with threshold or subthreshold Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED) (clinical utility), and (2) the severity of participants’ clinical features and mental Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) (convergent validity), when diagnosed according to either the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—5th edition (DSM-5) or the proposed International Classification of Diseases 11th edition (ICD-11) schemes. One hundred and seven adult men and women, with a high Body Mass Index (BMI) were evaluated by interview to confirm their eating disorder diagnoses. All participants completed self-report assessments of current symptoms and mental HRQoL. The majority of participants in either diagnostic scheme were included in the main categories of BN or BED (102/107, 95% in the ICD-11 and 85/107, 79% in the DSM-5). Fewer individuals received a subthreshold other or unspecified diagnosis with the ICD-11 compared to the DSM-5 scheme (5% vs. 21%). No significant differences in demographic, clinical features or mental HRQoL of participants with complete or partial BN or BED were found between diagnostic categories. Compared to the DSM-5, the proposed ICD-11 was not over inclusive, i.e., it did not appear to include people with less severe and potentially less clinically relevant symptoms. These results support the greater clinical utility of the ICD-11 whilst both schemes showed convergent validity. |
topic |
Bulimia Nervosa binge-eating disorder Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders International Classification of Diseases |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/11/1751 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marlyamorimpalavras aninvestigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi AT phillipahay aninvestigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi AT angelicaclaudino aninvestigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi AT marlyamorimpalavras investigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi AT phillipahay investigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi AT angelicaclaudino investigationoftheclinicalutilityoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticschemesforeatingdisorderscharacterizedbyrecurrentbingeeatinginpeoplewithahighbmi |
_version_ |
1716789066670800896 |