Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program
Background: The Cancer Support Community developed the Cancer Support Source (CSS) to assess the needs of cancer patients with distress. Each item on this self-administered questionnaire represents an area of concern which the patient rates and indicates their need for action with a “staff person,”...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Patient Experience |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518808309 |
id |
doaj-a9919cf76a1d4ac9afd60a55d94164af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a9919cf76a1d4ac9afd60a55d94164af2020-11-25T03:16:19ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Patient Experience2374-37352374-37432020-02-01710.1177/2374373518808309Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source ProgramEmily J Ross MA0Chelsea H Wiener MS1Diane Robinson PhD2Jeffrey E Cassisi PhD3 Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USABackground: The Cancer Support Community developed the Cancer Support Source (CSS) to assess the needs of cancer patients with distress. Each item on this self-administered questionnaire represents an area of concern which the patient rates and indicates their need for action with a “staff person,” but no details about the category of staff is given. Objective: To examine the factor structure of the CSS and to increase its utility to triage patients for referral to services based on a needs assessment. Methods: Data from 690 patients who completed the CSS over a 1-year period were analyzed. In study 1, an exploratory principal component analysis was conducted. In study 2, the fit of this proposed model was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: Three factors were retained in the final CFA: emotional distress, physical health concerns, and resource needs. This model demonstrated adequate fit, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)= 0.056, Comparitive Fit Index (CFI) = .907, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.050. Conclusions: Three factors are proposed as CSS subscales to guide referral and coordinate services: Emotional Distress/Patient and Family Counselor, Physical Health Concerns/Medical Care Provider, and Resource Needs/Case Management-Clinical Social Worker. The clinical utility of these referral subscales should be established with additional research.https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518808309 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emily J Ross MA Chelsea H Wiener MS Diane Robinson PhD Jeffrey E Cassisi PhD |
spellingShingle |
Emily J Ross MA Chelsea H Wiener MS Diane Robinson PhD Jeffrey E Cassisi PhD Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program Journal of Patient Experience |
author_facet |
Emily J Ross MA Chelsea H Wiener MS Diane Robinson PhD Jeffrey E Cassisi PhD |
author_sort |
Emily J Ross MA |
title |
Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program |
title_short |
Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program |
title_full |
Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program |
title_fullStr |
Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimizing Community and Hospital Services Using the Cancer Support Source Program |
title_sort |
optimizing community and hospital services using the cancer support source program |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Patient Experience |
issn |
2374-3735 2374-3743 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Background: The Cancer Support Community developed the Cancer Support Source (CSS) to assess the needs of cancer patients with distress. Each item on this self-administered questionnaire represents an area of concern which the patient rates and indicates their need for action with a “staff person,” but no details about the category of staff is given. Objective: To examine the factor structure of the CSS and to increase its utility to triage patients for referral to services based on a needs assessment. Methods: Data from 690 patients who completed the CSS over a 1-year period were analyzed. In study 1, an exploratory principal component analysis was conducted. In study 2, the fit of this proposed model was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: Three factors were retained in the final CFA: emotional distress, physical health concerns, and resource needs. This model demonstrated adequate fit, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)= 0.056, Comparitive Fit Index (CFI) = .907, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.050. Conclusions: Three factors are proposed as CSS subscales to guide referral and coordinate services: Emotional Distress/Patient and Family Counselor, Physical Health Concerns/Medical Care Provider, and Resource Needs/Case Management-Clinical Social Worker. The clinical utility of these referral subscales should be established with additional research. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518808309 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emilyjrossma optimizingcommunityandhospitalservicesusingthecancersupportsourceprogram AT chelseahwienerms optimizingcommunityandhospitalservicesusingthecancersupportsourceprogram AT dianerobinsonphd optimizingcommunityandhospitalservicesusingthecancersupportsourceprogram AT jeffreyecassisiphd optimizingcommunityandhospitalservicesusingthecancersupportsourceprogram |
_version_ |
1724636895333318656 |