Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia

In Medellin, during this last decade, the municipality and the private sector have been very active in the reconstruction of the city’s war-torn image. With the acknowledged objective of attracting foreign investments and tourists, the second city of Colombia has been consecutively branded as “innov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Patrick Naef
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8469
id doaj-a99e13a193e4455ba2351f540bad611e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a99e13a193e4455ba2351f540bad611e2020-11-25T03:55:08ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-10-01128469846910.3390/su12208469Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, ColombiaPatrick Naef0Department of Geography and Environment, University of Geneva, 66 Bd, 1211 Genève 4 Carl-Vogt, SwitzerlandIn Medellin, during this last decade, the municipality and the private sector have been very active in the reconstruction of the city’s war-torn image. With the acknowledged objective of attracting foreign investments and tourists, the second city of Colombia has been consecutively branded as “innovative”, “smart”, “sustainable” and lately as a “resilient city”. Since 2016 and the integration of the city as one of the first members of the “100 Resilient Cities” network pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation, Medellin’s authorities have emphasised “urban resilience” as a core value of the city and its residents. Until now, few studies have put into perspective the notion of “branding” with that of “resilience”. By looking closely at discourses on the promotion of the city, as well as its burgeoning tourism sector, this article aims to fill this gap by providing a thorough analysis of the way urban resilience is used as a city-brand in a city still struggling to overcome high levels of violence. This study aims to show that antagonists’ visions of resilience are at stake when comparing the branding discourses of public authorities and the representations of self-settled communities who are at the centre of these narratives. While branding discourses praise the resilience of Medellin communities, many in these same communities tend to reject this vision of resilience as self-reliance (adaptation) and instead call for structural changes (transformation).https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8469urban resilience100 Resilient Citiesbrandingtourismglobal citiesinnovation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Naef
spellingShingle Patrick Naef
Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia
Sustainability
urban resilience
100 Resilient Cities
branding
tourism
global cities
innovation
author_facet Patrick Naef
author_sort Patrick Naef
title Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia
title_short Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia
title_full Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia
title_fullStr Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Resilience as a City Brand: The Cases of the Comuna 13 and Moravia in Medellin, Colombia
title_sort resilience as a city brand: the cases of the comuna 13 and moravia in medellin, colombia
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-10-01
description In Medellin, during this last decade, the municipality and the private sector have been very active in the reconstruction of the city’s war-torn image. With the acknowledged objective of attracting foreign investments and tourists, the second city of Colombia has been consecutively branded as “innovative”, “smart”, “sustainable” and lately as a “resilient city”. Since 2016 and the integration of the city as one of the first members of the “100 Resilient Cities” network pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation, Medellin’s authorities have emphasised “urban resilience” as a core value of the city and its residents. Until now, few studies have put into perspective the notion of “branding” with that of “resilience”. By looking closely at discourses on the promotion of the city, as well as its burgeoning tourism sector, this article aims to fill this gap by providing a thorough analysis of the way urban resilience is used as a city-brand in a city still struggling to overcome high levels of violence. This study aims to show that antagonists’ visions of resilience are at stake when comparing the branding discourses of public authorities and the representations of self-settled communities who are at the centre of these narratives. While branding discourses praise the resilience of Medellin communities, many in these same communities tend to reject this vision of resilience as self-reliance (adaptation) and instead call for structural changes (transformation).
topic urban resilience
100 Resilient Cities
branding
tourism
global cities
innovation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8469
work_keys_str_mv AT patricknaef resilienceasacitybrandthecasesofthecomuna13andmoraviainmedellincolombia
_version_ 1724470544692150272