Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the UK has recommended that the effectiveness of ongoing exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity should be examined in research trials. Recent empirical evidence in heal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jolly Kate, Duda Joan L, Daley Amanda, Eves Frank F, Mutrie Nanette, Ntoumanis Nikos, Rouse Peter C, Lodhia Rekha, Williams Geoffrey C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-06-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/176
id doaj-a9d840113fed4a098b9df9dd3d307e3c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9d840113fed4a098b9df9dd3d307e3c2020-11-24T22:21:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582009-06-019117610.1186/1471-2458-9-176Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study designJolly KateDuda Joan LDaley AmandaEves Frank FMutrie NanetteNtoumanis NikosRouse Peter CLodhia RekhaWilliams Geoffrey C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the UK has recommended that the effectiveness of ongoing exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity should be examined in research trials. Recent empirical evidence in health care and physical activity promotion contexts provides a foundation for testing the utility of a Self Determination Theory (SDT)-based exercise referral consultation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Design: An exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial comparing standard provision exercise on prescription with a Self Determination Theory-based (SDT) exercise on prescription intervention.</p> <p>Participants: 347 people referred to the Birmingham Exercise on Prescription scheme between November 2007 and July 2008. The 13 exercise on prescription sites in Birmingham were randomised to current practice (n = 7) or to the SDT-based intervention (n = 6).</p> <p>Outcomes measured at 3 and 6-months: Minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity per week assessed using the 7-day Physical Activity Recall; physical health: blood pressure and weight; health status measured using the Dartmouth CO-OP charts; anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and vitality measured by the subjective vitality score; motivation and processes of change: perceptions of autonomy support from the advisor, satisfaction of the needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness via physical activity, and motivational regulations for exercise.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This trial will determine whether an exercise referral programme based on Self Determination Theory increases physical activity and other health outcomes compared to a standard programme and will test the underlying SDT-based process model (perceived autonomy support, need satisfaction, motivation regulations, outcomes) via structural equation modelling.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>The trial is registered as Current Controlled trials ISRCTN07682833.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/176
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jolly Kate
Duda Joan L
Daley Amanda
Eves Frank F
Mutrie Nanette
Ntoumanis Nikos
Rouse Peter C
Lodhia Rekha
Williams Geoffrey C
spellingShingle Jolly Kate
Duda Joan L
Daley Amanda
Eves Frank F
Mutrie Nanette
Ntoumanis Nikos
Rouse Peter C
Lodhia Rekha
Williams Geoffrey C
Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
BMC Public Health
author_facet Jolly Kate
Duda Joan L
Daley Amanda
Eves Frank F
Mutrie Nanette
Ntoumanis Nikos
Rouse Peter C
Lodhia Rekha
Williams Geoffrey C
author_sort Jolly Kate
title Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
title_short Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
title_full Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
title_fullStr Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
title_sort evaluation of a standard provision versus an autonomy promotive exercise referral programme: rationale and study design
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2009-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The National Institute of Clinical Excellence in the UK has recommended that the effectiveness of ongoing exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity should be examined in research trials. Recent empirical evidence in health care and physical activity promotion contexts provides a foundation for testing the utility of a Self Determination Theory (SDT)-based exercise referral consultation.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Design: An exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial comparing standard provision exercise on prescription with a Self Determination Theory-based (SDT) exercise on prescription intervention.</p> <p>Participants: 347 people referred to the Birmingham Exercise on Prescription scheme between November 2007 and July 2008. The 13 exercise on prescription sites in Birmingham were randomised to current practice (n = 7) or to the SDT-based intervention (n = 6).</p> <p>Outcomes measured at 3 and 6-months: Minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity per week assessed using the 7-day Physical Activity Recall; physical health: blood pressure and weight; health status measured using the Dartmouth CO-OP charts; anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and vitality measured by the subjective vitality score; motivation and processes of change: perceptions of autonomy support from the advisor, satisfaction of the needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness via physical activity, and motivational regulations for exercise.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This trial will determine whether an exercise referral programme based on Self Determination Theory increases physical activity and other health outcomes compared to a standard programme and will test the underlying SDT-based process model (perceived autonomy support, need satisfaction, motivation regulations, outcomes) via structural equation modelling.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>The trial is registered as Current Controlled trials ISRCTN07682833.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/176
work_keys_str_mv AT jollykate evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT dudajoanl evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT daleyamanda evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT evesfrankf evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT mutrienanette evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT ntoumanisnikos evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT rousepeterc evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT lodhiarekha evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
AT williamsgeoffreyc evaluationofastandardprovisionversusanautonomypromotiveexercisereferralprogrammerationaleandstudydesign
_version_ 1725769436656304128