Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón

Available evidence suggests that the patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] over 60% or in which a postoperative FEV1 is predicted over 45%, they do not develop severe disability after lung resection surgery; nevertheless, currently some groups are operating patients with EPOC a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luis Puente-maestu, Felipe Villar
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Complutense de Madrid 2006-01-01
Series:Psicooncologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/PSIC/article/view/16723
id doaj-a9e8a9a00b6f49698eb87e7e81b0bff6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9e8a9a00b6f49698eb87e7e81b0bff62020-11-25T00:34:36ZspaUniversidad Complutense de MadridPsicooncologia1696-72401988-82872006-01-013239340516738Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmónLuis Puente-maestuFelipe VillarAvailable evidence suggests that the patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] over 60% or in which a postoperative FEV1 is predicted over 45%, they do not develop severe disability after lung resection surgery; nevertheless, currently some groups are operating patients with EPOC and FEV1 less than 35%. In emphysema patients can occur that the function improve, as in the volume reduction lung surgery, but in the cases that it does not occur, they can remain with chronic shortness of breath until a 10%. At present, there are not any functional or effort test that be able to predict what patients will present satisfactory residual pulmonary function or chronic shortness of breath or important exercise limitations. It has been noticed that medical team opinion is not satisfactory to predict defi cit in postoperative quality of life. Nevertheless, long-term survivors (more than one year) inform relatively good quality of life, even in which they have pulmonary function reduced. In comparison with other chronic respiratory diseases, the survivors of lung cancer seem to be in better psychological state, the defi cit in quality of life is caused mainly by depression, and not for physical limitation. Therefore, empirical evidence does not justify excluding undergoing surgery on basis of medical team suppositions about a postoperative poor Quality of life. In addition, studies about Quality of Life suggests patients who is undergo lung cancer surgery are willing to assume risks for their survival, although, they want to receive information about how surgery may affect them.http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/PSIC/article/view/16723Cancer lung surgeryQuality of LifeSurgery decision
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luis Puente-maestu
Felipe Villar
spellingShingle Luis Puente-maestu
Felipe Villar
Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
Psicooncologia
Cancer lung surgery
Quality of Life
Surgery decision
author_facet Luis Puente-maestu
Felipe Villar
author_sort Luis Puente-maestu
title Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
title_short Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
title_full Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
title_fullStr Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
title_full_unstemmed Implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
title_sort implicaciones de la calidad de vida en las decisiones quirúrgicas del cáncer de pulmón
publisher Universidad Complutense de Madrid
series Psicooncologia
issn 1696-7240
1988-8287
publishDate 2006-01-01
description Available evidence suggests that the patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] over 60% or in which a postoperative FEV1 is predicted over 45%, they do not develop severe disability after lung resection surgery; nevertheless, currently some groups are operating patients with EPOC and FEV1 less than 35%. In emphysema patients can occur that the function improve, as in the volume reduction lung surgery, but in the cases that it does not occur, they can remain with chronic shortness of breath until a 10%. At present, there are not any functional or effort test that be able to predict what patients will present satisfactory residual pulmonary function or chronic shortness of breath or important exercise limitations. It has been noticed that medical team opinion is not satisfactory to predict defi cit in postoperative quality of life. Nevertheless, long-term survivors (more than one year) inform relatively good quality of life, even in which they have pulmonary function reduced. In comparison with other chronic respiratory diseases, the survivors of lung cancer seem to be in better psychological state, the defi cit in quality of life is caused mainly by depression, and not for physical limitation. Therefore, empirical evidence does not justify excluding undergoing surgery on basis of medical team suppositions about a postoperative poor Quality of life. In addition, studies about Quality of Life suggests patients who is undergo lung cancer surgery are willing to assume risks for their survival, although, they want to receive information about how surgery may affect them.
topic Cancer lung surgery
Quality of Life
Surgery decision
url http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/PSIC/article/view/16723
work_keys_str_mv AT luispuentemaestu implicacionesdelacalidaddevidaenlasdecisionesquirurgicasdelcancerdepulmon
AT felipevillar implicacionesdelacalidaddevidaenlasdecisionesquirurgicasdelcancerdepulmon
_version_ 1725312589257244672