Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation doses in various digital radiography systems using contrast-detail radiography (CDRAD) phantom. Methods: The image quality and radiation dose for seven different digital radiography systems were compared using the CDRAD...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Reza Choopani, Ali Chaparian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=3;spage=196;epage=200;aulast=Choopani
id doaj-a9e952101197467fbfaef9fe9c453b6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a9e952101197467fbfaef9fe9c453b6e2020-11-25T03:34:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Signals and Sensors2228-74772020-01-0110319620010.4103/jmss.JMSS_53_19Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performanceMohammad Reza ChoopaniAli ChaparianBackground: The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation doses in various digital radiography systems using contrast-detail radiography (CDRAD) phantom. Methods: The image quality and radiation dose for seven different digital radiography systems were compared using the CDRAD phantom. Incident air kerma (IAK) values were measured for certain exposure settings in all digital radiography systems. The images from the CDRAD phantom were evaluated by three observers. The results were displayed in the form of a contrast-detail (CD) curve. In addition, the inverse image quality figure (IQFinv)-to-IAK ratios were used for quantitative comparison of different digital radiography system performance. Results: Results of this study showed that the CD curves cannot be suitable criterion for determining the performance of digital radiography systems. For this reason, IQFinv-to-radiation dose (IAK) ratios in a fixed radiation condition were used. The highest performance in terms of producing high-quality images and low radiation dose was related to X-ray unit 1 and the lowest performance was for X-ray unit 5. Conclusion: The ratio of IQFinv to IAK for performance evaluation of digital radiography systems is an innovation of this study. A digital radiography system with a higher IQFinv-to-IAK ratio is associated with lower patient dose and better image quality. Therefore, it is recommended to equip the new imaging centers with the systems that have higher IQFinv-to-IAK ratios.http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=3;spage=196;epage=200;aulast=Choopanicontrast detailcontrast-detail radiography phantomdigital radiographyimage qualityradiation dose
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Reza Choopani
Ali Chaparian
spellingShingle Mohammad Reza Choopani
Ali Chaparian
Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
contrast detail
contrast-detail radiography phantom
digital radiography
image quality
radiation dose
author_facet Mohammad Reza Choopani
Ali Chaparian
author_sort Mohammad Reza Choopani
title Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
title_short Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
title_full Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
title_fullStr Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
title_sort introduction of a new parameter for evaluation of digital radiography system performance
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors
issn 2228-7477
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation doses in various digital radiography systems using contrast-detail radiography (CDRAD) phantom. Methods: The image quality and radiation dose for seven different digital radiography systems were compared using the CDRAD phantom. Incident air kerma (IAK) values were measured for certain exposure settings in all digital radiography systems. The images from the CDRAD phantom were evaluated by three observers. The results were displayed in the form of a contrast-detail (CD) curve. In addition, the inverse image quality figure (IQFinv)-to-IAK ratios were used for quantitative comparison of different digital radiography system performance. Results: Results of this study showed that the CD curves cannot be suitable criterion for determining the performance of digital radiography systems. For this reason, IQFinv-to-radiation dose (IAK) ratios in a fixed radiation condition were used. The highest performance in terms of producing high-quality images and low radiation dose was related to X-ray unit 1 and the lowest performance was for X-ray unit 5. Conclusion: The ratio of IQFinv to IAK for performance evaluation of digital radiography systems is an innovation of this study. A digital radiography system with a higher IQFinv-to-IAK ratio is associated with lower patient dose and better image quality. Therefore, it is recommended to equip the new imaging centers with the systems that have higher IQFinv-to-IAK ratios.
topic contrast detail
contrast-detail radiography phantom
digital radiography
image quality
radiation dose
url http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=3;spage=196;epage=200;aulast=Choopani
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezachoopani introductionofanewparameterforevaluationofdigitalradiographysystemperformance
AT alichaparian introductionofanewparameterforevaluationofdigitalradiographysystemperformance
_version_ 1724558173543596032