A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions

<p>Posterior fluxes obtained from inverse modelling are difficult to verify because there is no dense network of flux measurements available to evaluate estimates against. Here we present a new diagnostic to evaluate structures in posterior fluxes. First, we simulate the change in atmospher...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. M. Polavarapu, F. Deng, B. Byrne, D. B. A. Jones, M. Neish
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/12011/2018/acp-18-12011-2018.pdf
id doaj-aa03832a193e496caab1a78e9467c997
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa03832a193e496caab1a78e9467c9972020-11-25T01:40:45ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242018-08-0118120111204410.5194/acp-18-12011-2018A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversionsS. M. Polavarapu0F. Deng1B. Byrne2D. B. A. Jones3M. Neish4Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, CanadaDept. of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, CanadaDept. of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, CanadaDept. of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, Canada<p>Posterior fluxes obtained from inverse modelling are difficult to verify because there is no dense network of flux measurements available to evaluate estimates against. Here we present a new diagnostic to evaluate structures in posterior fluxes. First, we simulate the change in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> fields between posterior and prior fluxes, referred to as the posterior atmospheric adjustments due to updated fluxes (PAAFs). Second, we calculate the uncertainty in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> fields due solely to uncertainty in the meteorological fields, referred to as the posterior atmospheric adjustments due to imperfect meteorology (PAAMs). We argue that PAAF can only be considered robust if it exceeds PAAM, that is, the changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> between the posterior and prior fluxes should at least exceed atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> changes arising from imperfect meteorology. This diagnostic is applied to two CO<sub>2</sub> flux inversions: one which assimilates observations from the in situ CO<sub>2</sub> network and the other which assimilates observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). On the global scale, PAAF in the troposphere reflects northern extratropical fluxes, whereas stratospheric adjustments primarily reflect tropical fluxes. In general, larger spatiotemporal variations in PAAF are obtained for the GOSAT inversion than for the in situ inversion. Zonal standard deviations of the PAAF exceed the PAAM through most of the year when GOSAT observations are used, but the minimum value is exceeded only in boreal summer when in situ observations are used. Zonal spatial structures in GOSAT-based PAAF exceed PAAM throughout the year in the tropics and through most of the year in the northern extratropics, suggesting GOSAT flux inversions can constrain zonal asymmetries in fluxes. However, we cannot discount the possibility that these structures are influenced by biases in GOSAT retrievals. Verification of such spatial structures will require a dense network of independent observations. Because PAAF depends on the choice of prior fluxes, the comparison with PAAM is system dependent and thus can be used to monitor a given assimilation system's behaviour.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/12011/2018/acp-18-12011-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. M. Polavarapu
F. Deng
B. Byrne
D. B. A. Jones
M. Neish
spellingShingle S. M. Polavarapu
F. Deng
B. Byrne
D. B. A. Jones
M. Neish
A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet S. M. Polavarapu
F. Deng
B. Byrne
D. B. A. Jones
M. Neish
author_sort S. M. Polavarapu
title A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
title_short A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
title_full A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
title_fullStr A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
title_sort comparison of posterior atmospheric co<sub>2</sub> adjustments obtained from in situ and gosat constrained flux inversions
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2018-08-01
description <p>Posterior fluxes obtained from inverse modelling are difficult to verify because there is no dense network of flux measurements available to evaluate estimates against. Here we present a new diagnostic to evaluate structures in posterior fluxes. First, we simulate the change in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> fields between posterior and prior fluxes, referred to as the posterior atmospheric adjustments due to updated fluxes (PAAFs). Second, we calculate the uncertainty in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> fields due solely to uncertainty in the meteorological fields, referred to as the posterior atmospheric adjustments due to imperfect meteorology (PAAMs). We argue that PAAF can only be considered robust if it exceeds PAAM, that is, the changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> between the posterior and prior fluxes should at least exceed atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> changes arising from imperfect meteorology. This diagnostic is applied to two CO<sub>2</sub> flux inversions: one which assimilates observations from the in situ CO<sub>2</sub> network and the other which assimilates observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). On the global scale, PAAF in the troposphere reflects northern extratropical fluxes, whereas stratospheric adjustments primarily reflect tropical fluxes. In general, larger spatiotemporal variations in PAAF are obtained for the GOSAT inversion than for the in situ inversion. Zonal standard deviations of the PAAF exceed the PAAM through most of the year when GOSAT observations are used, but the minimum value is exceeded only in boreal summer when in situ observations are used. Zonal spatial structures in GOSAT-based PAAF exceed PAAM throughout the year in the tropics and through most of the year in the northern extratropics, suggesting GOSAT flux inversions can constrain zonal asymmetries in fluxes. However, we cannot discount the possibility that these structures are influenced by biases in GOSAT retrievals. Verification of such spatial structures will require a dense network of independent observations. Because PAAF depends on the choice of prior fluxes, the comparison with PAAM is system dependent and thus can be used to monitor a given assimilation system's behaviour.</p>
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/12011/2018/acp-18-12011-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT smpolavarapu acomparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT fdeng acomparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT bbyrne acomparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT dbajones acomparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT mneish acomparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT smpolavarapu comparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT fdeng comparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT bbyrne comparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT dbajones comparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
AT mneish comparisonofposterioratmosphericcosub2subadjustmentsobtainedfrominsituandgosatconstrainedfluxinversions
_version_ 1725043797087223808