Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India

PURPOSE: Biomarker—estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) —discordance plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Rates of discordance have been previously reported around 12%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ajay Gogia, S. V. Suryanarayana Deo, Dayanand Sharma, Rakesh K. Phulia, Sanjay Thulkar, Prabhat S. Malik, Sandeep Mathur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Global Oncology
Online Access:http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.18.00184
id doaj-aa0c476926524d8aa1736b94cb4ce3eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa0c476926524d8aa1736b94cb4ce3eb2020-11-25T03:16:53ZengAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyJournal of Global Oncology2378-95062019-04-0151810.1200/JGO.18.001841Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in IndiaAjay Gogia0S. V. Suryanarayana Deo1Dayanand Sharma2Rakesh K. Phulia3Sanjay Thulkar4Prabhat S. Malik5Sandeep Mathur6All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaAll India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, IndiaPURPOSE: Biomarker—estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) —discordance plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Rates of discordance have been previously reported around 12% to 35%, 30% to 50%, and 5% to 15%, respectively, in Western literature. Data are sparse regarding the same from developing countries, such as India. METHODS: We performed an ambispective review of paired biomarker status in patients with breast cancer—stage I, II, and III as per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition—who developed metastasis at recurrence (N = 103 patients). Biomarker status and clinical and radiologic parameters were documented at baseline and subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: Discordance was present in 21.3% for ER, 29.1% for PR, and 15.5% for HER2/neu receptor. In our cohort, 7.8% had positive to negative ER and 13.6% negative to positive. Whereas 21.4% had positive to negative PR, 7.8% had negative to positive PR. Approximately 6.8% had positive to negative HER2/neu receptor and 8.7% negative to positive. In our cohort, 41 patients (40%) had single-site metastasis—bone, 15.5%; lung, 11.7%; nonregional lymph node, 7.8%; liver, 3.9%; and brain, 0.97%. More than one site of metastasis was present in 62 patients (60%). The most common sites of metastasis were visceral—lung and liver—followed by bone, nonregional lymph node, skin, and brain. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that metastatic disease evolution in breast cancer is characterized by change in the tumor biology, which leads to discordance in receptor status. Repeat biomarker studies at metastatic recurrence is warranted, especially if treatment plans include hormone and targeted therapy.http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.18.00184
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ajay Gogia
S. V. Suryanarayana Deo
Dayanand Sharma
Rakesh K. Phulia
Sanjay Thulkar
Prabhat S. Malik
Sandeep Mathur
spellingShingle Ajay Gogia
S. V. Suryanarayana Deo
Dayanand Sharma
Rakesh K. Phulia
Sanjay Thulkar
Prabhat S. Malik
Sandeep Mathur
Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
Journal of Global Oncology
author_facet Ajay Gogia
S. V. Suryanarayana Deo
Dayanand Sharma
Rakesh K. Phulia
Sanjay Thulkar
Prabhat S. Malik
Sandeep Mathur
author_sort Ajay Gogia
title Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_short Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_full Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_fullStr Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_full_unstemmed Discordance in Biomarker Expression in Breast Cancer After Metastasis: Single Center Experience in India
title_sort discordance in biomarker expression in breast cancer after metastasis: single center experience in india
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
series Journal of Global Oncology
issn 2378-9506
publishDate 2019-04-01
description PURPOSE: Biomarker—estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) —discordance plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Rates of discordance have been previously reported around 12% to 35%, 30% to 50%, and 5% to 15%, respectively, in Western literature. Data are sparse regarding the same from developing countries, such as India. METHODS: We performed an ambispective review of paired biomarker status in patients with breast cancer—stage I, II, and III as per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition—who developed metastasis at recurrence (N = 103 patients). Biomarker status and clinical and radiologic parameters were documented at baseline and subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: Discordance was present in 21.3% for ER, 29.1% for PR, and 15.5% for HER2/neu receptor. In our cohort, 7.8% had positive to negative ER and 13.6% negative to positive. Whereas 21.4% had positive to negative PR, 7.8% had negative to positive PR. Approximately 6.8% had positive to negative HER2/neu receptor and 8.7% negative to positive. In our cohort, 41 patients (40%) had single-site metastasis—bone, 15.5%; lung, 11.7%; nonregional lymph node, 7.8%; liver, 3.9%; and brain, 0.97%. More than one site of metastasis was present in 62 patients (60%). The most common sites of metastasis were visceral—lung and liver—followed by bone, nonregional lymph node, skin, and brain. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that metastatic disease evolution in breast cancer is characterized by change in the tumor biology, which leads to discordance in receptor status. Repeat biomarker studies at metastatic recurrence is warranted, especially if treatment plans include hormone and targeted therapy.
url http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.18.00184
work_keys_str_mv AT ajaygogia discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT svsuryanarayanadeo discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT dayanandsharma discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT rakeshkphulia discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT sanjaythulkar discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT prabhatsmalik discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
AT sandeepmathur discordanceinbiomarkerexpressioninbreastcanceraftermetastasissinglecenterexperienceinindia
_version_ 1724634492326379520