The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism

This article evaluates Fiji’s Media Industry Development Decree 2010 by drawing a link between it and the Singaporean media laws and the collaborative role the Fijian regime claims journalism should play in the nation’s development. A number of sections of the Fiji Media Decree are similar to the S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reggie Dutt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pacific Media Centre 2010-10-01
Series:Pacific Journalism Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1036
id doaj-aa17338f2dc64e59aad27adc96414b73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa17338f2dc64e59aad27adc96414b732020-11-25T03:00:24ZengPacific Media CentrePacific Journalism Review1023-94992324-20352010-10-0116210.24135/pjr.v16i2.1036The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalismReggie Dutt This article evaluates Fiji’s Media Industry Development Decree 2010 by drawing a link between it and the Singaporean media laws and the collaborative role the Fijian regime claims journalism should play in the nation’s development. A number of sections of the Fiji Media Decree are similar to the Singapore Media Development Authority Act 2003 and it contains similar harsh fines and jail terms. The Fiji Media Decree makes provisions for a Media Industry Development Authority and a Media Tribunal, both of which are appointed and controlled by the government. The Authority has wide-ranging powers to search, seize and censor, and refer to the Tribunal incidents which it considers are in breach of the decree. The government minister responsible for administering the decree has a direct say in the make-up of the Media Industry Development Authority and may give directions to the Authority in the performance of its duties and the exercise of its powers. This study explores the powers vested in the government via these two proposed bodies and what they will mean for journalism, freedom of speech and media freedom in Fiji. It also shows the merits of a ‘collaborative journalism’ model for a developing nation but explains how the design is flawed under the conditions it has been imposed in Fiji. https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1036censorshipFiji coupscollaborative journalismDevelopment communicationdevelopment journalismfreedom of expression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reggie Dutt
spellingShingle Reggie Dutt
The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism
Pacific Journalism Review
censorship
Fiji coups
collaborative journalism
Development communication
development journalism
freedom of expression
author_facet Reggie Dutt
author_sort Reggie Dutt
title The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism
title_short The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism
title_full The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism
title_fullStr The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism
title_full_unstemmed The Fiji media decree: A push towards collaborative journalism
title_sort fiji media decree: a push towards collaborative journalism
publisher Pacific Media Centre
series Pacific Journalism Review
issn 1023-9499
2324-2035
publishDate 2010-10-01
description This article evaluates Fiji’s Media Industry Development Decree 2010 by drawing a link between it and the Singaporean media laws and the collaborative role the Fijian regime claims journalism should play in the nation’s development. A number of sections of the Fiji Media Decree are similar to the Singapore Media Development Authority Act 2003 and it contains similar harsh fines and jail terms. The Fiji Media Decree makes provisions for a Media Industry Development Authority and a Media Tribunal, both of which are appointed and controlled by the government. The Authority has wide-ranging powers to search, seize and censor, and refer to the Tribunal incidents which it considers are in breach of the decree. The government minister responsible for administering the decree has a direct say in the make-up of the Media Industry Development Authority and may give directions to the Authority in the performance of its duties and the exercise of its powers. This study explores the powers vested in the government via these two proposed bodies and what they will mean for journalism, freedom of speech and media freedom in Fiji. It also shows the merits of a ‘collaborative journalism’ model for a developing nation but explains how the design is flawed under the conditions it has been imposed in Fiji.
topic censorship
Fiji coups
collaborative journalism
Development communication
development journalism
freedom of expression
url https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1036
work_keys_str_mv AT reggiedutt thefijimediadecreeapushtowardscollaborativejournalism
AT reggiedutt fijimediadecreeapushtowardscollaborativejournalism
_version_ 1724698422982737920