Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea

Background: The increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) mandates the presence of simple but accurate tools to identify patients with this disorder for early detection and prevention of various serious consequences. This study aimed at comparing four sleep questionnaires as regards thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iman Hassan El-Sayed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-10-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763812000453
id doaj-aa2b8d978be14ca1b1a187087f1b4636
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa2b8d978be14ca1b1a187087f1b46362020-11-25T00:25:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382012-10-0161443344110.1016/j.ejcdt.2012.07.003Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apneaIman Hassan El-SayedBackground: The increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) mandates the presence of simple but accurate tools to identify patients with this disorder for early detection and prevention of various serious consequences. This study aimed at comparing four sleep questionnaires as regards their predictive probabilities for OSA. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 234 patients presenting to the sleep clinic. Four sleep questionnaires (Berlin, Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], STOP, and STOP-Bang) were administered to the patients and scoring of the results of the questionnaires was done. Overnight attended polysomnography (PSG) was done for all patients and was considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of OSA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the four questionnaires were calculated. Results: Of 234 screened patients; 87.1% had OSA, whereas 93.3%, 90.2%, 95.5%, and 68.3% were classified as being at high risk by the Berlin, STOP, STOP-Bang questionnaires and ESS, respectively. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity to predict OSA (97.55%, 95.07% and 91.67%, respectively), moderate-to-severe OSA (97.74%, 95.48% and 94.35%, respectively) and severe OSA (98.65%, 97.3% and 95.95%, respectively), but with a very low specificity for OSA patients (26.32%, 25% and 25%, respectively), moderate-to-severe OSA patients (3.7%, 7.41% and 25.93%, respectively) and severe OSA patients (5.36%, 10.71% and 19.64%, respectively), while the ESS had the highest specificity to predict OSA, moderate-to-severe OSA and severe OSA (75%, 48.15% and 46.43%, respectively) but with the lowest sensitivity (72.55%, 75.71% and 79.73%, respectively). Conclusions: The sensitivity of Berlin, STOP and STOP-Bang questionnaires was very high yet, the low specificity of these questionnaires results in increased false positives and failure of exclusion of individuals at low risk.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763812000453Obstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyBerlin questionnaireEpworth Sleepiness ScoreSTOP questionnaireSTOP-Bang questionnaire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iman Hassan El-Sayed
spellingShingle Iman Hassan El-Sayed
Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Obstructive sleep apnea
Polysomnography
Berlin questionnaire
Epworth Sleepiness Score
STOP questionnaire
STOP-Bang questionnaire
author_facet Iman Hassan El-Sayed
author_sort Iman Hassan El-Sayed
title Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
title_short Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
title_full Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
title_fullStr Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
title_sort comparison of four sleep questionnaires for screening obstructive sleep apnea
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
issn 0422-7638
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Background: The increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) mandates the presence of simple but accurate tools to identify patients with this disorder for early detection and prevention of various serious consequences. This study aimed at comparing four sleep questionnaires as regards their predictive probabilities for OSA. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 234 patients presenting to the sleep clinic. Four sleep questionnaires (Berlin, Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], STOP, and STOP-Bang) were administered to the patients and scoring of the results of the questionnaires was done. Overnight attended polysomnography (PSG) was done for all patients and was considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of OSA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the four questionnaires were calculated. Results: Of 234 screened patients; 87.1% had OSA, whereas 93.3%, 90.2%, 95.5%, and 68.3% were classified as being at high risk by the Berlin, STOP, STOP-Bang questionnaires and ESS, respectively. The STOP-Bang, Berlin and STOP questionnaires had the highest sensitivity to predict OSA (97.55%, 95.07% and 91.67%, respectively), moderate-to-severe OSA (97.74%, 95.48% and 94.35%, respectively) and severe OSA (98.65%, 97.3% and 95.95%, respectively), but with a very low specificity for OSA patients (26.32%, 25% and 25%, respectively), moderate-to-severe OSA patients (3.7%, 7.41% and 25.93%, respectively) and severe OSA patients (5.36%, 10.71% and 19.64%, respectively), while the ESS had the highest specificity to predict OSA, moderate-to-severe OSA and severe OSA (75%, 48.15% and 46.43%, respectively) but with the lowest sensitivity (72.55%, 75.71% and 79.73%, respectively). Conclusions: The sensitivity of Berlin, STOP and STOP-Bang questionnaires was very high yet, the low specificity of these questionnaires results in increased false positives and failure of exclusion of individuals at low risk.
topic Obstructive sleep apnea
Polysomnography
Berlin questionnaire
Epworth Sleepiness Score
STOP questionnaire
STOP-Bang questionnaire
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763812000453
work_keys_str_mv AT imanhassanelsayed comparisonoffoursleepquestionnairesforscreeningobstructivesleepapnea
_version_ 1725346803532955648