Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT

Abstract Background The introduction of hybrid SPECT/CT devices enables quantitative imaging in SPECT, providing a methodological setup for quantitation using SPECT tracers comparable to PET/CT. We evaluated a specific quantitative reconstruction algorithm for SPECT data using a 99mTc-filled NEMA ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dennis Kupitz, Heiko Wissel, Jan Wuestemann, Stephanie Bluemel, Maciej Pech, Holger Amthauer, Michael C. Kreissl, Oliver S. Grosser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-07-01
Series:EJNMMI Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3
id doaj-aa470e73750f472daf1accf8e4ba22a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa470e73750f472daf1accf8e4ba22a42021-08-01T11:29:05ZengSpringerOpenEJNMMI Physics2197-73642021-07-018111410.1186/s40658-021-00405-3Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECTDennis Kupitz0Heiko Wissel1Jan Wuestemann2Stephanie Bluemel3Maciej Pech4Holger Amthauer5Michael C. Kreissl6Oliver S. Grosser7Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MagdeburgDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MagdeburgDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MagdeburgDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MagdeburgDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MagdeburgDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital MagdeburgAbstract Background The introduction of hybrid SPECT/CT devices enables quantitative imaging in SPECT, providing a methodological setup for quantitation using SPECT tracers comparable to PET/CT. We evaluated a specific quantitative reconstruction algorithm for SPECT data using a 99mTc-filled NEMA phantom. Quantitative and qualitative image parameters were evaluated for different parametrizations of the acquisition and reconstruction protocol to identify an optimized quantitative protocol. Results The reconstructed activity concentration (ACrec) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of all examined protocols (n = 16) were significantly affected by the parametrization of the weighting factor k used in scatter correction, the total number of iterations and the sphere volume (all, p < 0.0001). The two examined SPECT acquisition protocols (with 60 or 120 projections) had a minor impact on the ACrec and no significant impact on the SNR. In comparison to the known AC, the use of default scatter correction (k = 0.47) or object-specific scatter correction (k = 0.18) resulted in an underestimation of ACrec in the largest sphere volume (26.5 ml) by − 13.9 kBq/ml (− 16.3%) and − 7.1 kBq/ml (− 8.4%), respectively. An increase in total iterations leads to an increase in estimated AC and a decrease in SNR. The mean difference between ACrec and known AC decreased with an increasing number of total iterations (e.g., for 20 iterations (2 iterations/10 subsets) = − 14.6 kBq/ml (− 17.1%), 240 iterations (24i/10s) = − 8.0 kBq/ml (− 9.4%), p < 0.0001). In parallel, the mean SNR decreased significantly from 2i/10s to 24i/10s by 76% (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Quantitative SPECT imaging is feasible with the used reconstruction algorithm and hybrid SPECT/CT, and its consistent implementation in diagnostics may provide perspectives for quantification in routine clinical practice (e.g., assessment of bone metabolism). When combining quantitative analysis and diagnostic imaging, we recommend using two different reconstruction protocols with task-specific optimized setups (quantitative vs. qualitative reconstruction). Furthermore, individual scatter correction significantly improves both quantitative and qualitative results.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3Quantitative SPECTSPECT/CTOptimizationScatter correctionImage reconstruction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dennis Kupitz
Heiko Wissel
Jan Wuestemann
Stephanie Bluemel
Maciej Pech
Holger Amthauer
Michael C. Kreissl
Oliver S. Grosser
spellingShingle Dennis Kupitz
Heiko Wissel
Jan Wuestemann
Stephanie Bluemel
Maciej Pech
Holger Amthauer
Michael C. Kreissl
Oliver S. Grosser
Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT
EJNMMI Physics
Quantitative SPECT
SPECT/CT
Optimization
Scatter correction
Image reconstruction
author_facet Dennis Kupitz
Heiko Wissel
Jan Wuestemann
Stephanie Bluemel
Maciej Pech
Holger Amthauer
Michael C. Kreissl
Oliver S. Grosser
author_sort Dennis Kupitz
title Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT
title_short Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT
title_full Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT
title_fullStr Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of SPECT/CT imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mTc SPECT
title_sort optimization of spect/ct imaging protocols for quantitative and qualitative 99mtc spect
publisher SpringerOpen
series EJNMMI Physics
issn 2197-7364
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background The introduction of hybrid SPECT/CT devices enables quantitative imaging in SPECT, providing a methodological setup for quantitation using SPECT tracers comparable to PET/CT. We evaluated a specific quantitative reconstruction algorithm for SPECT data using a 99mTc-filled NEMA phantom. Quantitative and qualitative image parameters were evaluated for different parametrizations of the acquisition and reconstruction protocol to identify an optimized quantitative protocol. Results The reconstructed activity concentration (ACrec) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of all examined protocols (n = 16) were significantly affected by the parametrization of the weighting factor k used in scatter correction, the total number of iterations and the sphere volume (all, p < 0.0001). The two examined SPECT acquisition protocols (with 60 or 120 projections) had a minor impact on the ACrec and no significant impact on the SNR. In comparison to the known AC, the use of default scatter correction (k = 0.47) or object-specific scatter correction (k = 0.18) resulted in an underestimation of ACrec in the largest sphere volume (26.5 ml) by − 13.9 kBq/ml (− 16.3%) and − 7.1 kBq/ml (− 8.4%), respectively. An increase in total iterations leads to an increase in estimated AC and a decrease in SNR. The mean difference between ACrec and known AC decreased with an increasing number of total iterations (e.g., for 20 iterations (2 iterations/10 subsets) = − 14.6 kBq/ml (− 17.1%), 240 iterations (24i/10s) = − 8.0 kBq/ml (− 9.4%), p < 0.0001). In parallel, the mean SNR decreased significantly from 2i/10s to 24i/10s by 76% (p < 0.0001). Conclusion Quantitative SPECT imaging is feasible with the used reconstruction algorithm and hybrid SPECT/CT, and its consistent implementation in diagnostics may provide perspectives for quantification in routine clinical practice (e.g., assessment of bone metabolism). When combining quantitative analysis and diagnostic imaging, we recommend using two different reconstruction protocols with task-specific optimized setups (quantitative vs. qualitative reconstruction). Furthermore, individual scatter correction significantly improves both quantitative and qualitative results.
topic Quantitative SPECT
SPECT/CT
Optimization
Scatter correction
Image reconstruction
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00405-3
work_keys_str_mv AT denniskupitz optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT heikowissel optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT janwuestemann optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT stephaniebluemel optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT maciejpech optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT holgeramthauer optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT michaelckreissl optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
AT oliversgrosser optimizationofspectctimagingprotocolsforquantitativeandqualitative99mtcspect
_version_ 1721245912236294144