Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent monogenetic disorders. It can be associated with cognitive dysfunctions in several domains such as executive functioning, language, visual perception, motor skills, social skills, memory and/or attention. Neuroimaging is becoming more and mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eloïse Baudou, Federico Nemmi, Maëlle Biotteau, Stéphanie Maziero, Patrice Peran, Yves Chaix
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
NF1
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.01373/full
id doaj-aa4a9ac737684f8eb6182694c55e6087
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa4a9ac737684f8eb6182694c55e60872020-11-25T02:39:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952020-01-011010.3389/fneur.2019.01373476657Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A ReviewEloïse Baudou0Eloïse Baudou1Federico Nemmi2Maëlle Biotteau3Stéphanie Maziero4Stéphanie Maziero5Patrice Peran6Yves Chaix7Yves Chaix8Children's Hospital, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, FranceToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, FranceToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, FranceToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, FranceOctogone-Lordat, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, FranceToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, FranceChildren's Hospital, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, FranceToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, FranceNeurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent monogenetic disorders. It can be associated with cognitive dysfunctions in several domains such as executive functioning, language, visual perception, motor skills, social skills, memory and/or attention. Neuroimaging is becoming more and more important for a clearer understanding of the neural basis of these deficits. In recent years, several studies have used different imaging techniques to examine structural, morphological and functional alterations in NF1 disease. They have shown that NF1 patients have specific brain characteristics such as Unidentified Bright Objects (UBOs), macrocephaly, a higher volume of subcortical structures, microstructure integrity alterations, or connectivity alterations. In this review, which focuses on the studies published after the last 2 reviews of this topic (in 2010 and 2011), we report on recent structural, morphological and functional neuroimaging studies in NF1 subjects, with special focus on those that examine the neural basis of the NF1 cognitive phenotype. Although UBOs are one of the most obvious and visible elements in brain imaging, correlation studies have failed to establish a robust and reproducible link between major cognitive deficits in NF1 and their presence, number or localization. In the same vein, the results among structural studies are not consistent. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies appear to be more sensitive, especially for understanding the executive function deficit that seems to be associated with a dysfunction in the right inferior frontal areas and the middle frontal areas. Similarly, fMRI studies have found that visuospatial deficits could be associated with a dysfunction in the visual cortex and especially in the magnocellular pathway involved in the processing of low spatial frequency and high temporal frequency. Connectivity studies have shown a reduction in anterior-posterior “long-range” connectivity and a deficit in deactivation in default mode network (DMN) during cognitive tasks. In conclusion, despite the contribution of new imaging techniques and despite relative advancement, the cognitive phenotype of NF1 patients is not totally understood.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.01373/fullNF1cognitive phenotypecerebral substratebrain imageryfMRI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eloïse Baudou
Eloïse Baudou
Federico Nemmi
Maëlle Biotteau
Stéphanie Maziero
Stéphanie Maziero
Patrice Peran
Yves Chaix
Yves Chaix
spellingShingle Eloïse Baudou
Eloïse Baudou
Federico Nemmi
Maëlle Biotteau
Stéphanie Maziero
Stéphanie Maziero
Patrice Peran
Yves Chaix
Yves Chaix
Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review
Frontiers in Neurology
NF1
cognitive phenotype
cerebral substrate
brain imagery
fMRI
author_facet Eloïse Baudou
Eloïse Baudou
Federico Nemmi
Maëlle Biotteau
Stéphanie Maziero
Stéphanie Maziero
Patrice Peran
Yves Chaix
Yves Chaix
author_sort Eloïse Baudou
title Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review
title_short Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review
title_full Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review
title_fullStr Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review
title_full_unstemmed Can the Cognitive Phenotype in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Be Explained by Neuroimaging? A Review
title_sort can the cognitive phenotype in neurofibromatosis type 1 (nf1) be explained by neuroimaging? a review
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most frequent monogenetic disorders. It can be associated with cognitive dysfunctions in several domains such as executive functioning, language, visual perception, motor skills, social skills, memory and/or attention. Neuroimaging is becoming more and more important for a clearer understanding of the neural basis of these deficits. In recent years, several studies have used different imaging techniques to examine structural, morphological and functional alterations in NF1 disease. They have shown that NF1 patients have specific brain characteristics such as Unidentified Bright Objects (UBOs), macrocephaly, a higher volume of subcortical structures, microstructure integrity alterations, or connectivity alterations. In this review, which focuses on the studies published after the last 2 reviews of this topic (in 2010 and 2011), we report on recent structural, morphological and functional neuroimaging studies in NF1 subjects, with special focus on those that examine the neural basis of the NF1 cognitive phenotype. Although UBOs are one of the most obvious and visible elements in brain imaging, correlation studies have failed to establish a robust and reproducible link between major cognitive deficits in NF1 and their presence, number or localization. In the same vein, the results among structural studies are not consistent. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies appear to be more sensitive, especially for understanding the executive function deficit that seems to be associated with a dysfunction in the right inferior frontal areas and the middle frontal areas. Similarly, fMRI studies have found that visuospatial deficits could be associated with a dysfunction in the visual cortex and especially in the magnocellular pathway involved in the processing of low spatial frequency and high temporal frequency. Connectivity studies have shown a reduction in anterior-posterior “long-range” connectivity and a deficit in deactivation in default mode network (DMN) during cognitive tasks. In conclusion, despite the contribution of new imaging techniques and despite relative advancement, the cognitive phenotype of NF1 patients is not totally understood.
topic NF1
cognitive phenotype
cerebral substrate
brain imagery
fMRI
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.01373/full
work_keys_str_mv AT eloisebaudou canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT eloisebaudou canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT federiconemmi canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT maellebiotteau canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT stephaniemaziero canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT stephaniemaziero canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT patriceperan canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT yveschaix canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
AT yveschaix canthecognitivephenotypeinneurofibromatosistype1nf1beexplainedbyneuroimagingareview
_version_ 1724786797203947520