The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications.
Although the scientific peer review process is crucial to distributing research investments, little has been reported about the decision-making processes used by reviewers. One key attribute likely to be important for decision-making is reviewer expertise. Recent data from an experimental blinded re...
Main Authors: | Stephen A Gallo, Joanne H Sullivan, Scott R Glisson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165147 |
Similar Items
-
Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study. [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Adrian G Barnett, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Adrian G Barnett, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
The validation of peer review through research impact measures and the implications for funding strategies.
by: Stephen A Gallo, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures
by: Stephen A. Gallo, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Teleconference versus face-to-face scientific peer review of grant application: effects on review outcomes.
by: Stephen A Gallo, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)