Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center

Background: The purpose of intraoperative neuro-monitoring (IONM) is to minimize injury to eloquent neural structures and optimize tumor resection. Method: We explored the utility of IONM using a qualitative approach in a single center. Eight experienced users of its use in spinal and cranial surger...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chulananda Goonasekera, Holly Jones, Rebekah Lawrence, John Hanrahan, Priyanka Iyer, Aditi Nijhawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=1;spage=7;epage=13;aulast=Goonasekera
id doaj-aa9baa81af0244f9a6190b464b14c055
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aa9baa81af0244f9a6190b464b14c0552021-02-03T07:08:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Anaesthesia1658-354X2021-01-0115171310.4103/sja.SJA_862_20Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single centerChulananda GoonasekeraHolly JonesRebekah LawrenceJohn HanrahanPriyanka IyerAditi NijhawanBackground: The purpose of intraoperative neuro-monitoring (IONM) is to minimize injury to eloquent neural structures and optimize tumor resection. Method: We explored the utility of IONM using a qualitative approach in a single center. Eight experienced users of its use in spinal and cranial surgery in adults and children were the informants. Using a constant comparative method, the findings were collated by thematic analysis. Results: The user perspective is that of caution to minimize adverse effects whilst empowering the need for formal training to enhance its efficacy. The process of IONM needs standardization as practices vary amongst users. Most users expressed limited trust on its current capabilities but hoped for its advancement to achieve higher sensitivity and specificity. None were however prepared to abandon its use. Conclusion: IONM needs optimization. Its utility depends on user vigilance, multi-disciplinary validation, and individual expertise. This study draws out key issues from the user perspective that need to be addressed in order to enhance the utility of IONM.http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=1;spage=7;epage=13;aulast=Goonasekeraintraoperativeneuro-modulationneuro-monitoringneurosurgeryrisk-benefitutility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chulananda Goonasekera
Holly Jones
Rebekah Lawrence
John Hanrahan
Priyanka Iyer
Aditi Nijhawan
spellingShingle Chulananda Goonasekera
Holly Jones
Rebekah Lawrence
John Hanrahan
Priyanka Iyer
Aditi Nijhawan
Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
intraoperative
neuro-modulation
neuro-monitoring
neurosurgery
risk-benefit
utility
author_facet Chulananda Goonasekera
Holly Jones
Rebekah Lawrence
John Hanrahan
Priyanka Iyer
Aditi Nijhawan
author_sort Chulananda Goonasekera
title Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center
title_short Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center
title_full Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center
title_fullStr Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: The users′ perspective in a single center
title_sort exploring the utility of neuro-monitoring in neurosurgery: the users′ perspective in a single center
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 1658-354X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: The purpose of intraoperative neuro-monitoring (IONM) is to minimize injury to eloquent neural structures and optimize tumor resection. Method: We explored the utility of IONM using a qualitative approach in a single center. Eight experienced users of its use in spinal and cranial surgery in adults and children were the informants. Using a constant comparative method, the findings were collated by thematic analysis. Results: The user perspective is that of caution to minimize adverse effects whilst empowering the need for formal training to enhance its efficacy. The process of IONM needs standardization as practices vary amongst users. Most users expressed limited trust on its current capabilities but hoped for its advancement to achieve higher sensitivity and specificity. None were however prepared to abandon its use. Conclusion: IONM needs optimization. Its utility depends on user vigilance, multi-disciplinary validation, and individual expertise. This study draws out key issues from the user perspective that need to be addressed in order to enhance the utility of IONM.
topic intraoperative
neuro-modulation
neuro-monitoring
neurosurgery
risk-benefit
utility
url http://www.saudija.org/article.asp?issn=1658-354X;year=2021;volume=15;issue=1;spage=7;epage=13;aulast=Goonasekera
work_keys_str_mv AT chulanandagoonasekera exploringtheutilityofneuromonitoringinneurosurgerytheusersperspectiveinasinglecenter
AT hollyjones exploringtheutilityofneuromonitoringinneurosurgerytheusersperspectiveinasinglecenter
AT rebekahlawrence exploringtheutilityofneuromonitoringinneurosurgerytheusersperspectiveinasinglecenter
AT johnhanrahan exploringtheutilityofneuromonitoringinneurosurgerytheusersperspectiveinasinglecenter
AT priyankaiyer exploringtheutilityofneuromonitoringinneurosurgerytheusersperspectiveinasinglecenter
AT aditinijhawan exploringtheutilityofneuromonitoringinneurosurgerytheusersperspectiveinasinglecenter
_version_ 1724288366289092608