Summary: | In the present work, using Heusler Ni<sub>49+x</sub>Mn<sub>36-x</sub>In<sub>15</sub> (with x = 0 and 0.5) alloys, it is shown that the choice of the appropriate measurement protocol (erasing the prior state of the sample in between experiments) in ∆<i>T<sub>ad</sub></i> first shot characterization is crucial for obtaining reliable results. Unlike indirect measurements, for which incorrect protocols produce overestimates of the characteristics of the material, erroneous direct measurements underestimate ∆<i>T<sub>ad</sub></i> in the region close to its first order phase transition. The error in ∆<i>T<sub>ad</sub></i> is found to be dependent on the temperature step used, being up to ~40% underestimation, including a slight shift in its peak temperature.
|