An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
The relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has become a recurrent subject of research in recent years. Currently, results that indicate that the accumulation of economic growth leads to a reduction in environmental impact coexist with others that do not show any evidence in th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5489 |
id |
doaj-aaccff1353eb449389828b2bd2c2db47 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-aaccff1353eb449389828b2bd2c2db472021-06-01T00:00:48ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135489548910.3390/su13105489An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)Pablo Alonso-Fernández0Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira1Applied Economy Department, Faculty of Economics, North Campus, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainApplied Economy Department, Faculty of Economics, North Campus, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainThe relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has become a recurrent subject of research in recent years. Currently, results that indicate that the accumulation of economic growth leads to a reduction in environmental impact coexist with others that do not show any evidence in this respect. This paper aims to analyse this relationship using Material Flow Analysis through the two most frequent methods: territorial or production and consumption. For this purpose, data from China, the United Kingdom and the USA from 1990–2017 are used. The results show that the method used influences the conclusions, mainly due to differences in the accounting of physical trade flows. The production method, in which physical trade flows coincide with monetary trade flows, tends to underestimate the material consumption of rich, importing countries, while overestimating that of exporting countries. Policies based on this method have limited capacity to reduce global environmental impacts. The consumption method allows the environmental impact to be allocated to each country in a way that is more in line with its true material requirements.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5489economic growthenvironmental impactmaterial flow analysisdematerialisationdelocalisationoffshoring |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pablo Alonso-Fernández Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira |
spellingShingle |
Pablo Alonso-Fernández Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017) Sustainability economic growth environmental impact material flow analysis dematerialisation delocalisation offshoring |
author_facet |
Pablo Alonso-Fernández Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira |
author_sort |
Pablo Alonso-Fernández |
title |
An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017) |
title_short |
An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017) |
title_full |
An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017) |
title_fullStr |
An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017) |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017) |
title_sort |
approximation to the environmental impact of economic growth using the material flow analysis: differences between production and consumption methods, applied to china, united kingdom and usa (1990–2017) |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
The relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has become a recurrent subject of research in recent years. Currently, results that indicate that the accumulation of economic growth leads to a reduction in environmental impact coexist with others that do not show any evidence in this respect. This paper aims to analyse this relationship using Material Flow Analysis through the two most frequent methods: territorial or production and consumption. For this purpose, data from China, the United Kingdom and the USA from 1990–2017 are used. The results show that the method used influences the conclusions, mainly due to differences in the accounting of physical trade flows. The production method, in which physical trade flows coincide with monetary trade flows, tends to underestimate the material consumption of rich, importing countries, while overestimating that of exporting countries. Policies based on this method have limited capacity to reduce global environmental impacts. The consumption method allows the environmental impact to be allocated to each country in a way that is more in line with its true material requirements. |
topic |
economic growth environmental impact material flow analysis dematerialisation delocalisation offshoring |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5489 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pabloalonsofernandez anapproximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017 AT rosamariaregueiroferreira anapproximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017 AT pabloalonsofernandez approximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017 AT rosamariaregueiroferreira approximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017 |
_version_ |
1721416028826632192 |