An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)

The relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has become a recurrent subject of research in recent years. Currently, results that indicate that the accumulation of economic growth leads to a reduction in environmental impact coexist with others that do not show any evidence in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo Alonso-Fernández, Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5489
id doaj-aaccff1353eb449389828b2bd2c2db47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aaccff1353eb449389828b2bd2c2db472021-06-01T00:00:48ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135489548910.3390/su13105489An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)Pablo Alonso-Fernández0Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira1Applied Economy Department, Faculty of Economics, North Campus, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainApplied Economy Department, Faculty of Economics, North Campus, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainThe relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has become a recurrent subject of research in recent years. Currently, results that indicate that the accumulation of economic growth leads to a reduction in environmental impact coexist with others that do not show any evidence in this respect. This paper aims to analyse this relationship using Material Flow Analysis through the two most frequent methods: territorial or production and consumption. For this purpose, data from China, the United Kingdom and the USA from 1990–2017 are used. The results show that the method used influences the conclusions, mainly due to differences in the accounting of physical trade flows. The production method, in which physical trade flows coincide with monetary trade flows, tends to underestimate the material consumption of rich, importing countries, while overestimating that of exporting countries. Policies based on this method have limited capacity to reduce global environmental impacts. The consumption method allows the environmental impact to be allocated to each country in a way that is more in line with its true material requirements.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5489economic growthenvironmental impactmaterial flow analysisdematerialisationdelocalisationoffshoring
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pablo Alonso-Fernández
Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira
spellingShingle Pablo Alonso-Fernández
Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira
An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
Sustainability
economic growth
environmental impact
material flow analysis
dematerialisation
delocalisation
offshoring
author_facet Pablo Alonso-Fernández
Rosa María Regueiro-Ferreira
author_sort Pablo Alonso-Fernández
title An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
title_short An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
title_full An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
title_fullStr An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
title_full_unstemmed An Approximation to the Environmental Impact of Economic Growth Using the Material Flow Analysis: Differences between Production and Consumption Methods, Applied to China, United Kingdom and USA (1990–2017)
title_sort approximation to the environmental impact of economic growth using the material flow analysis: differences between production and consumption methods, applied to china, united kingdom and usa (1990–2017)
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The relationship between economic growth and environmental impact has become a recurrent subject of research in recent years. Currently, results that indicate that the accumulation of economic growth leads to a reduction in environmental impact coexist with others that do not show any evidence in this respect. This paper aims to analyse this relationship using Material Flow Analysis through the two most frequent methods: territorial or production and consumption. For this purpose, data from China, the United Kingdom and the USA from 1990–2017 are used. The results show that the method used influences the conclusions, mainly due to differences in the accounting of physical trade flows. The production method, in which physical trade flows coincide with monetary trade flows, tends to underestimate the material consumption of rich, importing countries, while overestimating that of exporting countries. Policies based on this method have limited capacity to reduce global environmental impacts. The consumption method allows the environmental impact to be allocated to each country in a way that is more in line with its true material requirements.
topic economic growth
environmental impact
material flow analysis
dematerialisation
delocalisation
offshoring
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5489
work_keys_str_mv AT pabloalonsofernandez anapproximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017
AT rosamariaregueiroferreira anapproximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017
AT pabloalonsofernandez approximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017
AT rosamariaregueiroferreira approximationtotheenvironmentalimpactofeconomicgrowthusingthematerialflowanalysisdifferencesbetweenproductionandconsumptionmethodsappliedtochinaunitedkingdomandusa19902017
_version_ 1721416028826632192