Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’

This article is concerned with the question of how two obvious but apparently antithetical features of aesthetic experience – distance and immersion – can be integrated into one theory. The author criticizes the contemporary neglect of the first feature (distance or disinterestedness), and argues fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ondřej Dadejík
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2015-01-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2015.4
id doaj-aae71d4a126a4bec91bf3dd21e2bcca1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aae71d4a126a4bec91bf3dd21e2bcca12020-11-25T02:50:27ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica0567-82932464-70552015-01-0120141314610.14712/24647055.2015.41624Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’Ondřej DadejíkThis article is concerned with the question of how two obvious but apparently antithetical features of aesthetic experience – distance and immersion – can be integrated into one theory. The author criticizes the contemporary neglect of the first feature (distance or disinterestedness), and argues for a more dialectical notion of aesthetic experience which would include both of them. To this end, the article starts, in section one, by re-examining the main points in the evolution of phenomenological aesthetics, which some authors consider a chief source of this neglect. The presence of two questions is emphasized: (1) the idea of a distinctive perception which we traditionally call aesthetic and can trace back to Kantian roots and (2) the process of breaking with the subject-object model of experience. In the end of this section, the question is raised whether the successful elimination of the latter means the necessary rejection of the former. In section two, the author argues for a negative answer to this question, and a candidate for a ‘new paradigm’ of aesthetics is considered – the idea of the environment. As the conclusion to this section, the compatibility of the idea of the aesthetic mode of perception in the traditional sense, together with the original sense of the idea of environment, is defended. Lastly, in section three, these findings are made more specific and confirmed by turning to Jan Patočka’s analyses of the experience of space.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2015.4Jan Patočkaphenomenological aestheticsdistanceimmersionspace
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ondřej Dadejík
spellingShingle Ondřej Dadejík
Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’
Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica
Jan Patočka
phenomenological aesthetics
distance
immersion
space
author_facet Ondřej Dadejík
author_sort Ondřej Dadejík
title Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’
title_short Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’
title_full Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’
title_fullStr Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’
title_full_unstemmed Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a ‘Paradigm Shift’
title_sort distance and immersion: phenomenological aesthetics and the question of a ‘paradigm shift’
publisher Karolinum Press
series Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica
issn 0567-8293
2464-7055
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This article is concerned with the question of how two obvious but apparently antithetical features of aesthetic experience – distance and immersion – can be integrated into one theory. The author criticizes the contemporary neglect of the first feature (distance or disinterestedness), and argues for a more dialectical notion of aesthetic experience which would include both of them. To this end, the article starts, in section one, by re-examining the main points in the evolution of phenomenological aesthetics, which some authors consider a chief source of this neglect. The presence of two questions is emphasized: (1) the idea of a distinctive perception which we traditionally call aesthetic and can trace back to Kantian roots and (2) the process of breaking with the subject-object model of experience. In the end of this section, the question is raised whether the successful elimination of the latter means the necessary rejection of the former. In section two, the author argues for a negative answer to this question, and a candidate for a ‘new paradigm’ of aesthetics is considered – the idea of the environment. As the conclusion to this section, the compatibility of the idea of the aesthetic mode of perception in the traditional sense, together with the original sense of the idea of environment, is defended. Lastly, in section three, these findings are made more specific and confirmed by turning to Jan Patočka’s analyses of the experience of space.
topic Jan Patočka
phenomenological aesthetics
distance
immersion
space
url http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2015.4
work_keys_str_mv AT ondrejdadejik distanceandimmersionphenomenologicalaestheticsandthequestionofaparadigmshift
_version_ 1724738390005383168