Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization

We report a case of probable contrast-induced neurotoxicity that followed a technically challenging cardiac catheterization in a 69-year-old woman. The procedure had involved the administration of a large cumulative dose of an iodinated, nonionic contrast medium into the innominate artery: twelve ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Law, Kessarin Panichpisal, Melaku Demede, Sabu John, Jonathan D. Marmur, Jaya Nath, Alison E. Baird
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/267860
id doaj-ab187829dc804b76ab316f97502e5e78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab187829dc804b76ab316f97502e5e782020-11-25T00:22:51ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Medicine1687-96271687-96352012-01-01201210.1155/2012/267860267860Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac CatheterizationSusan Law0Kessarin Panichpisal1Melaku Demede2Sabu John3Jonathan D. Marmur4Jaya Nath5Alison E. Baird6Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, P.O. Box 1274, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USADivision of Neurology, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok 10110, ThailandDivisions of Cardiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Kings County Hospital Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USADivisions of Cardiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Kings County Hospital Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USADivisions of Cardiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Kings County Hospital Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USADivisions of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Kings County Hospital Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USADepartment of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, P.O. Box 1274, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USAWe report a case of probable contrast-induced neurotoxicity that followed a technically challenging cardiac catheterization in a 69-year-old woman. The procedure had involved the administration of a large cumulative dose of an iodinated, nonionic contrast medium into the innominate artery: twelve hours following the catheterization, the patient developed a seizure followed by a left hemiplegia, and an initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed sulcal effacement in the right cerebral hemisphere due to cerebral swelling. The patient’s clinical symptoms resolved within 24 hours, and magnetic resonance imaging at 32 hours showed resolution of swelling. Contrast-induced neurotoxicity should be found in the differential diagnosis of acute neurological deficits occurring after radiological procedures involving iodinated contrast media, whether ionic or nonionic.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/267860
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan Law
Kessarin Panichpisal
Melaku Demede
Sabu John
Jonathan D. Marmur
Jaya Nath
Alison E. Baird
spellingShingle Susan Law
Kessarin Panichpisal
Melaku Demede
Sabu John
Jonathan D. Marmur
Jaya Nath
Alison E. Baird
Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization
Case Reports in Medicine
author_facet Susan Law
Kessarin Panichpisal
Melaku Demede
Sabu John
Jonathan D. Marmur
Jaya Nath
Alison E. Baird
author_sort Susan Law
title Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization
title_short Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization
title_full Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization
title_fullStr Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization
title_full_unstemmed Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity following Cardiac Catheterization
title_sort contrast-induced neurotoxicity following cardiac catheterization
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Medicine
issn 1687-9627
1687-9635
publishDate 2012-01-01
description We report a case of probable contrast-induced neurotoxicity that followed a technically challenging cardiac catheterization in a 69-year-old woman. The procedure had involved the administration of a large cumulative dose of an iodinated, nonionic contrast medium into the innominate artery: twelve hours following the catheterization, the patient developed a seizure followed by a left hemiplegia, and an initial computed tomography (CT) scan showed sulcal effacement in the right cerebral hemisphere due to cerebral swelling. The patient’s clinical symptoms resolved within 24 hours, and magnetic resonance imaging at 32 hours showed resolution of swelling. Contrast-induced neurotoxicity should be found in the differential diagnosis of acute neurological deficits occurring after radiological procedures involving iodinated contrast media, whether ionic or nonionic.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/267860
work_keys_str_mv AT susanlaw contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
AT kessarinpanichpisal contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
AT melakudemede contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
AT sabujohn contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
AT jonathandmarmur contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
AT jayanath contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
AT alisonebaird contrastinducedneurotoxicityfollowingcardiaccatheterization
_version_ 1725358128421142528