Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore

Abstract Density‐dependent competition for food reduces vital rates, with juvenile survival often the first to decline. A clear prediction of food‐based, density‐dependent competition for large herbivores is decreasing juvenile survival with increasing density. However, competition for enemy‐free sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark A. Hurley, Mark Hebblewhite, Jean‐Michel Gaillard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-06-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6289
id doaj-ab68bc2f5b68477d928b8ccb696b4ec8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab68bc2f5b68477d928b8ccb696b4ec82021-04-02T13:20:47ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582020-06-0110125464547510.1002/ece3.6289Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivoreMark A. Hurley0Mark Hebblewhite1Jean‐Michel Gaillard2Idaho Department of Fish and Game Boise ID USAWildlife Biology Program Department of Ecosystem Sciences and Conservation W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation University of Montana Missoula MT USALaboratoire Biométrie & Biologie Évolutive CNRSUMR‐CNRS 5558University Claude Bernard ‐ Lyon I Villeurbanne Cedex FranceAbstract Density‐dependent competition for food reduces vital rates, with juvenile survival often the first to decline. A clear prediction of food‐based, density‐dependent competition for large herbivores is decreasing juvenile survival with increasing density. However, competition for enemy‐free space could also be a significant mechanism for density dependence in territorial species. How juvenile survival is predicted to change across density depends critically on the nature of predator–prey dynamics and spatial overlap among predator and prey, especially in multiple‐predator systems. Here, we used a management experiment that reduced densities of a generalist predator, coyotes, and specialist predator, mountain lions, over a 5‐year period to test for spatial density dependence mediated by predation on juvenile mule deer in Idaho, USA. We tested the spatial density‐dependence hypothesis by tracking the fate of 251 juvenile mule deer, estimating cause‐specific mortality, and testing responses to changes in deer density and predator abundance. Overall juvenile mortality did not increase with deer density, but generalist coyote‐caused mortality did, but not when coyote density was reduced experimentally. Mountain lion‐caused mortality did not change with deer density in the reference area in contradiction of the food‐based competition hypothesis, but declined in the treatment area, opposite to the pattern of coyotes. These observations clearly reject the food‐based density‐dependence hypothesis for juvenile mule deer. Instead, our results provide support for the spatial density‐dependence hypothesis that competition for enemy‐free space increases predation by generalist predators on juvenile large herbivores.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6289habitat selectionideal despotic distributionideal free distributionpredation riskpredator removal experimentungulate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark A. Hurley
Mark Hebblewhite
Jean‐Michel Gaillard
spellingShingle Mark A. Hurley
Mark Hebblewhite
Jean‐Michel Gaillard
Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
Ecology and Evolution
habitat selection
ideal despotic distribution
ideal free distribution
predation risk
predator removal experiment
ungulate
author_facet Mark A. Hurley
Mark Hebblewhite
Jean‐Michel Gaillard
author_sort Mark A. Hurley
title Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
title_short Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
title_full Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
title_fullStr Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
title_full_unstemmed Competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
title_sort competition for safe real estate, not food, drives density‐dependent juvenile survival in a large herbivore
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Density‐dependent competition for food reduces vital rates, with juvenile survival often the first to decline. A clear prediction of food‐based, density‐dependent competition for large herbivores is decreasing juvenile survival with increasing density. However, competition for enemy‐free space could also be a significant mechanism for density dependence in territorial species. How juvenile survival is predicted to change across density depends critically on the nature of predator–prey dynamics and spatial overlap among predator and prey, especially in multiple‐predator systems. Here, we used a management experiment that reduced densities of a generalist predator, coyotes, and specialist predator, mountain lions, over a 5‐year period to test for spatial density dependence mediated by predation on juvenile mule deer in Idaho, USA. We tested the spatial density‐dependence hypothesis by tracking the fate of 251 juvenile mule deer, estimating cause‐specific mortality, and testing responses to changes in deer density and predator abundance. Overall juvenile mortality did not increase with deer density, but generalist coyote‐caused mortality did, but not when coyote density was reduced experimentally. Mountain lion‐caused mortality did not change with deer density in the reference area in contradiction of the food‐based competition hypothesis, but declined in the treatment area, opposite to the pattern of coyotes. These observations clearly reject the food‐based density‐dependence hypothesis for juvenile mule deer. Instead, our results provide support for the spatial density‐dependence hypothesis that competition for enemy‐free space increases predation by generalist predators on juvenile large herbivores.
topic habitat selection
ideal despotic distribution
ideal free distribution
predation risk
predator removal experiment
ungulate
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6289
work_keys_str_mv AT markahurley competitionforsaferealestatenotfooddrivesdensitydependentjuvenilesurvivalinalargeherbivore
AT markhebblewhite competitionforsaferealestatenotfooddrivesdensitydependentjuvenilesurvivalinalargeherbivore
AT jeanmichelgaillard competitionforsaferealestatenotfooddrivesdensitydependentjuvenilesurvivalinalargeherbivore
_version_ 1721565398616244224