Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley

In the Sacramento Valley, irrigation water is vital to agriculture and agriculture is vital to local economies. This study investigates these relationships by asking: If surface irrigation water were cut by 25%, what would be the economic impacts on farmers and on communit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyunok Lee, Daniel Sumner, Richard Howtt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources 2001-03-01
Series:California Agriculture
Online Access:http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v055n02p33
id doaj-ab7e7e2590094d3cb3b5a655b736abf6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ab7e7e2590094d3cb3b5a655b736abf62020-11-24T20:52:52ZengUniversity of California Agriculture and Natural ResourcesCalifornia Agriculture0008-08452160-80912001-03-01552334010.3733/ca.v055n02p3310.3733/cav055n02_10Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento ValleyHyunok Lee0Daniel Sumner1Richard Howtt2H. Lee is Research Economist, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC DavisD. Sumner is Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis.R. Howitt is Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, UC Davis.In the Sacramento Valley, irrigation water is vital to agriculture and agriculture is vital to local economies. This study investigates these relationships by asking: If surface irrigation water were cut by 25%, what would be the economic impacts on farmers and on communities? The study results indicate that the effects would not be uniform across crops and the eight counties in the Sacramento Valley. In most regions and for most crops, a cut in irrigation water would cause a modest acreage reduction of up to 3%. Overall crop-revenue losses for core regions would total $8 million while the loss for the entire Sacramento Valley would be $11 million. About 80% of those losses would take place in poorer counties that depend most heavily on agriculture, and particularly on rice. However, in response to surface-water reductions, farmers and others would mitigate their losses by making adjustments such as conserving water, changing cropping patterns or implementing new technologies.http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v055n02p33
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hyunok Lee
Daniel Sumner
Richard Howtt
spellingShingle Hyunok Lee
Daniel Sumner
Richard Howtt
Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley
California Agriculture
author_facet Hyunok Lee
Daniel Sumner
Richard Howtt
author_sort Hyunok Lee
title Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley
title_short Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley
title_full Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley
title_fullStr Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley
title_full_unstemmed Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley
title_sort potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for sacramento valley
publisher University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources
series California Agriculture
issn 0008-0845
2160-8091
publishDate 2001-03-01
description In the Sacramento Valley, irrigation water is vital to agriculture and agriculture is vital to local economies. This study investigates these relationships by asking: If surface irrigation water were cut by 25%, what would be the economic impacts on farmers and on communities? The study results indicate that the effects would not be uniform across crops and the eight counties in the Sacramento Valley. In most regions and for most crops, a cut in irrigation water would cause a modest acreage reduction of up to 3%. Overall crop-revenue losses for core regions would total $8 million while the loss for the entire Sacramento Valley would be $11 million. About 80% of those losses would take place in poorer counties that depend most heavily on agriculture, and particularly on rice. However, in response to surface-water reductions, farmers and others would mitigate their losses by making adjustments such as conserving water, changing cropping patterns or implementing new technologies.
url http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.v055n02p33
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunoklee potentialeconomicimpactsofirrigationwaterreductionsestimatedforsacramentovalley
AT danielsumner potentialeconomicimpactsofirrigationwaterreductionsestimatedforsacramentovalley
AT richardhowtt potentialeconomicimpactsofirrigationwaterreductionsestimatedforsacramentovalley
_version_ 1716798688215433216