Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Cardiovascular operations are associated with an inherent bleeding tendency that sometimes leads to severe bleeding and transfusion requirement. Pharmacological intervention to minimize post-bypass bleeding and blood product transfusions has received increasing attention from both medica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jafar Hashemi, Rostam Esfandiari, Bahador Baharestani, Mohammad Hassan Ghaffari Nejad, Abdollah Panahipoor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-03-01
Series:Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/20681.pdf&manuscript_id=20681
id doaj-abea056c364a41b9bad5637ba0dae978
record_format Article
spelling doaj-abea056c364a41b9bad5637ba0dae9782020-11-25T04:06:18ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Tehran University Heart Center1735-86202012-03-01711518Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Jafar HashemiRostam EsfandiariBahador BaharestaniMohammad Hassan Ghaffari NejadAbdollah PanahipoorBackground: Cardiovascular operations are associated with an inherent bleeding tendency that sometimes leads to severe bleeding and transfusion requirement. Pharmacological intervention to minimize post-bypass bleeding and blood product transfusions has received increasing attention from both medical and economic viewpoints. Methods: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruited three groups of patients (each group consisting of 50 patients) undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and blindly randomized them to receive either low aprotinin, tranexamic acid, or placebo. The results were, subsequently, evaluated and compared between the groups. All the patients were operated on by one surgeon and the same surgery team. Results: The following variables were similar between the groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of these variables: age (p value = 0.308), sex (p value = 0.973), hyperlipidemia (p value = 0.720), hypertension (p value = 0.786), smoking (p value = 0.72), and diabetes (p value = 0.960). The amounts of drainage from chest tubes were less in the aprotinin and tranexamic acid groups than the amount in the placebo group; the difference was statistically important (p value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to need for reoperation for bleeding between the three groups (p value = 0.998). Complications following surgery in the three groups were statistically the same and not significantly different. All the complications (myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion, neurological complication and renal complication) had a good course, and all the patients were discharged from the hospital uneventfully. There was no mortality in any group. Conclusions: Low-dose aprotinin and tranexamic acid can significantly reduce blood loss and transfusion requirement in CABG without importantly increasing mortality and morbidity.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/20681.pdf&manuscript_id=20681AprotininTranexamic AcidCoronary Artery Bypass
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jafar Hashemi
Rostam Esfandiari
Bahador Baharestani
Mohammad Hassan Ghaffari Nejad
Abdollah Panahipoor
spellingShingle Jafar Hashemi
Rostam Esfandiari
Bahador Baharestani
Mohammad Hassan Ghaffari Nejad
Abdollah Panahipoor
Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Aprotinin
Tranexamic Acid
Coronary Artery Bypass
author_facet Jafar Hashemi
Rostam Esfandiari
Bahador Baharestani
Mohammad Hassan Ghaffari Nejad
Abdollah Panahipoor
author_sort Jafar Hashemi
title Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Comparison of Using Low-Dose Aprotinin and Tranexamic Acid in CABG: a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort evaluation and comparison of using low-dose aprotinin and tranexamic acid in cabg: a double blind randomized clinical trial
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
issn 1735-8620
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Background: Cardiovascular operations are associated with an inherent bleeding tendency that sometimes leads to severe bleeding and transfusion requirement. Pharmacological intervention to minimize post-bypass bleeding and blood product transfusions has received increasing attention from both medical and economic viewpoints. Methods: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruited three groups of patients (each group consisting of 50 patients) undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and blindly randomized them to receive either low aprotinin, tranexamic acid, or placebo. The results were, subsequently, evaluated and compared between the groups. All the patients were operated on by one surgeon and the same surgery team. Results: The following variables were similar between the groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of these variables: age (p value = 0.308), sex (p value = 0.973), hyperlipidemia (p value = 0.720), hypertension (p value = 0.786), smoking (p value = 0.72), and diabetes (p value = 0.960). The amounts of drainage from chest tubes were less in the aprotinin and tranexamic acid groups than the amount in the placebo group; the difference was statistically important (p value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to need for reoperation for bleeding between the three groups (p value = 0.998). Complications following surgery in the three groups were statistically the same and not significantly different. All the complications (myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion, neurological complication and renal complication) had a good course, and all the patients were discharged from the hospital uneventfully. There was no mortality in any group. Conclusions: Low-dose aprotinin and tranexamic acid can significantly reduce blood loss and transfusion requirement in CABG without importantly increasing mortality and morbidity.
topic Aprotinin
Tranexamic Acid
Coronary Artery Bypass
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/20681.pdf&manuscript_id=20681
work_keys_str_mv AT jafarhashemi evaluationandcomparisonofusinglowdoseaprotininandtranexamicacidincabgadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rostamesfandiari evaluationandcomparisonofusinglowdoseaprotininandtranexamicacidincabgadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bahadorbaharestani evaluationandcomparisonofusinglowdoseaprotininandtranexamicacidincabgadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohammadhassanghaffarinejad evaluationandcomparisonofusinglowdoseaprotininandtranexamicacidincabgadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT abdollahpanahipoor evaluationandcomparisonofusinglowdoseaprotininandtranexamicacidincabgadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724431590445023232