Tempestatis obsequium in principem

Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nelu Zugravu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC) 2021-04-01
Series:Classica, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912
id doaj-ac14600e68e140c1bf679b5599668b2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac14600e68e140c1bf679b5599668b2a2021-05-04T20:30:33ZengSociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)Classica, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos0103-43162176-64362021-04-0134110.24277/classica.v34i1.912Tempestatis obsequium in principem Nelu Zugravu0Centre d’Études Classiques et Chrétiennes, Faculté d’histoire, Université “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” de Iași, Roumanie Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality. https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912Panegyrici Latini idéologie impériale rapport souverain-nature vertus impériales légitimisme consensus politique
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nelu Zugravu
spellingShingle Nelu Zugravu
Tempestatis obsequium in principem
Classica, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos
Panegyrici Latini
idéologie impériale
rapport souverain-nature
vertus impériales
légitimisme
consensus politique
author_facet Nelu Zugravu
author_sort Nelu Zugravu
title Tempestatis obsequium in principem
title_short Tempestatis obsequium in principem
title_full Tempestatis obsequium in principem
title_fullStr Tempestatis obsequium in principem
title_full_unstemmed Tempestatis obsequium in principem
title_sort tempestatis obsequium in principem
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos (SBEC)
series Classica, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos
issn 0103-4316
2176-6436
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Among the sources that reflect the transformations occurred in the imperial ideology during the 3rd-4th centuries, we find the speeches uttered between 289 and 389 in official and solemn circumstances by orators from Gallia (some of them anonymous), reunited since the Antiquity in the corpus entitled Panegyrici Latini. A special place in this respect is occupied by the divine nature of the emperor. The biography on the matter is rather consistent, but we may still add to the discussion an aspect that has not been approached thus far, and that I will approach in this paper, namely the relation between the princeps and the elements of nature. The analysis of the paragraphs concerning the control over the physical universe by the sovereigns allows the emphasis on aesthetical formulas through which the orators have accentuated certain defining elements of the ideology conveyed using their discourses – the cosmocratic rulership, exceptional civilian and military powers, legitimate election, the consensus between the Court and the provincial political circles. The sections of the paper are based on these aspects: 1. Maximianus – fortitudo; fortuna; felicitas; 2. Constantius and the providentia; 3. Constantine – utilitas publica; virtus; princeps salutaris; 4. Theodosius and the meritocratic principality.
topic Panegyrici Latini
idéologie impériale
rapport souverain-nature
vertus impériales
légitimisme
consensus politique
url https://revista.classica.org.br/classica/article/view/912
work_keys_str_mv AT neluzugravu tempestatisobsequiuminprincipem
_version_ 1721477378016804864