Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage

Developing cartilage constructs with injectability, appropriate matrix composition, and persistent cartilaginous phenotype remains an enduring challenge in cartilage repair. Fourteen patients with minor contour deformity were treated with fluid cartilage filler gently injected as autologous fluid gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelo Trivisonno, Steven R. Cohen, Guy Magalon, Jèrèmy Magalon, Aris Sterodimas, Michele Pascali, Valerio Cervelli, Gabriele Toietta, Alfredo Colaprietra, Filippo Calcagni, Augusto Orlandi, Maria Giovanni Scioli, Pietro Gentile
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/7/1062
id doaj-ac5ef7baf95d42afa4d852cf10440abc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac5ef7baf95d42afa4d852cf10440abc2020-11-24T21:49:07ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442019-03-01127106210.3390/ma12071062ma12071062Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid CartilageAngelo Trivisonno0Steven R. Cohen1Guy Magalon2Jèrèmy Magalon3Aris Sterodimas4Michele Pascali5Valerio Cervelli6Gabriele Toietta7Alfredo Colaprietra8Filippo Calcagni9Augusto Orlandi10Maria Giovanni Scioli11Pietro Gentile12Department of Surgical Science University of Rome “La Sapienza”, 00161 Rome, ItalyFACES+ Plastic Surgery, Skin and Laser Center, La Jolla CA 92121, USA and Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92121, USACell Therapy Laboratory, CBT-1409, INSERM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, FrancePlastic Surgery Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM), Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, FranceDepartment of Plastic Surgery, IASO General Hospital, Athens 15562, GreeceDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Research, Advanced Diagnostic, and Technological Innovation, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Plastic Surgery Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, ItalyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, ItalyDeveloping cartilage constructs with injectability, appropriate matrix composition, and persistent cartilaginous phenotype remains an enduring challenge in cartilage repair. Fourteen patients with minor contour deformity were treated with fluid cartilage filler gently injected as autologous fluid graft in deep planes of defect of the nose that were close to the bone or the cartilage. A computerized tomographic scan control was performed after 12 months. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to investigate differences in cartilage density between native and newly formed cartilages. The endpoints were the possibility of using fluid cartilage as filler with aesthetic and functional improvement and versatility. Patients were followed up for two years. The constructs of fluid cartilage graft that were injected in the deep plane resulted in a persistent cartilage tissue with appropriate morphology, adequate central nutritional perfusion without central necrosis or ossification, and further augmented nasal dorsum without obvious contraction and deformation. This report demonstrated that fluid cartilage grafts are useful for cartilage regeneration in patients with outcomes of rhinoplasty, internal nasal valve collapse, and minor congenital nose aesthetics deformity.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/7/1062fluid cartilageminor nose defectsrhinoplastydiced cartilagecrushing cartilage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angelo Trivisonno
Steven R. Cohen
Guy Magalon
Jèrèmy Magalon
Aris Sterodimas
Michele Pascali
Valerio Cervelli
Gabriele Toietta
Alfredo Colaprietra
Filippo Calcagni
Augusto Orlandi
Maria Giovanni Scioli
Pietro Gentile
spellingShingle Angelo Trivisonno
Steven R. Cohen
Guy Magalon
Jèrèmy Magalon
Aris Sterodimas
Michele Pascali
Valerio Cervelli
Gabriele Toietta
Alfredo Colaprietra
Filippo Calcagni
Augusto Orlandi
Maria Giovanni Scioli
Pietro Gentile
Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage
Materials
fluid cartilage
minor nose defects
rhinoplasty
diced cartilage
crushing cartilage
author_facet Angelo Trivisonno
Steven R. Cohen
Guy Magalon
Jèrèmy Magalon
Aris Sterodimas
Michele Pascali
Valerio Cervelli
Gabriele Toietta
Alfredo Colaprietra
Filippo Calcagni
Augusto Orlandi
Maria Giovanni Scioli
Pietro Gentile
author_sort Angelo Trivisonno
title Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage
title_short Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage
title_full Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage
title_fullStr Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage
title_full_unstemmed Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage
title_sort fluid cartilage as new autologous biomaterial in the treatment of minor nose defects: clinical and microscopic difference amongst diced, crushed, and fluid cartilage
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Developing cartilage constructs with injectability, appropriate matrix composition, and persistent cartilaginous phenotype remains an enduring challenge in cartilage repair. Fourteen patients with minor contour deformity were treated with fluid cartilage filler gently injected as autologous fluid graft in deep planes of defect of the nose that were close to the bone or the cartilage. A computerized tomographic scan control was performed after 12 months. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to investigate differences in cartilage density between native and newly formed cartilages. The endpoints were the possibility of using fluid cartilage as filler with aesthetic and functional improvement and versatility. Patients were followed up for two years. The constructs of fluid cartilage graft that were injected in the deep plane resulted in a persistent cartilage tissue with appropriate morphology, adequate central nutritional perfusion without central necrosis or ossification, and further augmented nasal dorsum without obvious contraction and deformation. This report demonstrated that fluid cartilage grafts are useful for cartilage regeneration in patients with outcomes of rhinoplasty, internal nasal valve collapse, and minor congenital nose aesthetics deformity.
topic fluid cartilage
minor nose defects
rhinoplasty
diced cartilage
crushing cartilage
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/7/1062
work_keys_str_mv AT angelotrivisonno fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT stevenrcohen fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT guymagalon fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT jeremymagalon fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT arissterodimas fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT michelepascali fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT valeriocervelli fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT gabrieletoietta fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT alfredocolaprietra fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT filippocalcagni fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT augustoorlandi fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT mariagiovanniscioli fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
AT pietrogentile fluidcartilageasnewautologousbiomaterialinthetreatmentofminornosedefectsclinicalandmicroscopicdifferenceamongstdicedcrushedandfluidcartilage
_version_ 1725889428763705344