A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.

Stanley Milgram's 1960s experimental findings that people would administer apparently lethal electric shocks to a stranger at the behest of an authority figure remain critical for understanding obedience. Yet, due to the ethical controversy that his experiments ignited, it is nowadays impossibl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mel Slater, Angus Antley, Adam Davison, David Swapp, Christoph Guger, Chris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, Maria V Sanchez-Vives
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2006-12-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1762398?pdf=render
id doaj-ac663279a2064039873d63c77347297f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac663279a2064039873d63c77347297f2020-11-25T00:23:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032006-12-011e3910.1371/journal.pone.0000039A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.Mel SlaterAngus AntleyAdam DavisonDavid SwappChristoph GugerChris BarkerNancy PistrangMaria V Sanchez-VivesStanley Milgram's 1960s experimental findings that people would administer apparently lethal electric shocks to a stranger at the behest of an authority figure remain critical for understanding obedience. Yet, due to the ethical controversy that his experiments ignited, it is nowadays impossible to carry out direct experimental studies in this area. In the study reported in this paper, we have used a similar paradigm to the one used by Milgram within an immersive virtual environment. Our objective has not been the study of obedience in itself, but of the extent to which participants would respond to such an extreme social situation as if it were real in spite of their knowledge that no real events were taking place.Following the style of the original experiments, the participants were invited to administer a series of word association memory tests to the (female) virtual human representing the stranger. When she gave an incorrect answer, the participants were instructed to administer an 'electric shock' to her, increasing the voltage each time. She responded with increasing discomfort and protests, eventually demanding termination of the experiment. Of the 34 participants, 23 saw and heard the virtual human, and 11 communicated with her only through a text interface.Our results show that in spite of the fact that all participants knew for sure that neither the stranger nor the shocks were real, the participants who saw and heard her tended to respond to the situation at the subjective, behavioural and physiological levels as if it were real. This result reopens the door to direct empirical studies of obedience and related extreme social situations, an area of research that is otherwise not open to experimental study for ethical reasons, through the employment of virtual environments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1762398?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mel Slater
Angus Antley
Adam Davison
David Swapp
Christoph Guger
Chris Barker
Nancy Pistrang
Maria V Sanchez-Vives
spellingShingle Mel Slater
Angus Antley
Adam Davison
David Swapp
Christoph Guger
Chris Barker
Nancy Pistrang
Maria V Sanchez-Vives
A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mel Slater
Angus Antley
Adam Davison
David Swapp
Christoph Guger
Chris Barker
Nancy Pistrang
Maria V Sanchez-Vives
author_sort Mel Slater
title A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.
title_short A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.
title_full A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.
title_fullStr A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.
title_full_unstemmed A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.
title_sort virtual reprise of the stanley milgram obedience experiments.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2006-12-01
description Stanley Milgram's 1960s experimental findings that people would administer apparently lethal electric shocks to a stranger at the behest of an authority figure remain critical for understanding obedience. Yet, due to the ethical controversy that his experiments ignited, it is nowadays impossible to carry out direct experimental studies in this area. In the study reported in this paper, we have used a similar paradigm to the one used by Milgram within an immersive virtual environment. Our objective has not been the study of obedience in itself, but of the extent to which participants would respond to such an extreme social situation as if it were real in spite of their knowledge that no real events were taking place.Following the style of the original experiments, the participants were invited to administer a series of word association memory tests to the (female) virtual human representing the stranger. When she gave an incorrect answer, the participants were instructed to administer an 'electric shock' to her, increasing the voltage each time. She responded with increasing discomfort and protests, eventually demanding termination of the experiment. Of the 34 participants, 23 saw and heard the virtual human, and 11 communicated with her only through a text interface.Our results show that in spite of the fact that all participants knew for sure that neither the stranger nor the shocks were real, the participants who saw and heard her tended to respond to the situation at the subjective, behavioural and physiological levels as if it were real. This result reopens the door to direct empirical studies of obedience and related extreme social situations, an area of research that is otherwise not open to experimental study for ethical reasons, through the employment of virtual environments.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1762398?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT melslater avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT angusantley avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT adamdavison avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT davidswapp avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT christophguger avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT chrisbarker avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT nancypistrang avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT mariavsanchezvives avirtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT melslater virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT angusantley virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT adamdavison virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT davidswapp virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT christophguger virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT chrisbarker virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT nancypistrang virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
AT mariavsanchezvives virtualrepriseofthestanleymilgramobedienceexperiments
_version_ 1725357178113490944