Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal

John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal seem unlikely bedfellows – a fiercely Protestant English artisan with only vernacular literacy and a devoutly Catholic French polymath. Yet there are striking affinities between the two in their theologies, spiritual experience, and apologetic methodologies. Both believ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Parry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone 2019-07-01
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/4474
id doaj-ac91694e0ad246a99d7d3ca92f79ee71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ac91694e0ad246a99d7d3ca92f79ee712020-11-25T01:09:31ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04502019-07-013510.4000/episteme.4474Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise PascalDavid ParryJohn Bunyan and Blaise Pascal seem unlikely bedfellows – a fiercely Protestant English artisan with only vernacular literacy and a devoutly Catholic French polymath. Yet there are striking affinities between the two in their theologies, spiritual experience, and apologetic methodologies. Both believe that conversion requires divine intervention, yet both quote St Paul’s words Fides ex auditu / “Faith cometh by hearing” (Romans 10:17), thus involving human persuasion in conversion. Though both sometimes employ rational propositional arguments, both see rational argument as insufficient to change a person’s affections and will. Both Bunyan and Pascal adopt literary strategies of persuasion to faith that seek to bypass and subvert their readers’ cognitive defences. Pascal’s famous “wager” (pari) is often criticised for seeking to compel an impossible belief in something of which one is not persuaded. However, this criticism misconstrues the literary context. In this section of the Pensées, Pascal is speaking “selon les lumières naturelles” (“according to natural lights”), adopting St Paul’s rhetorical strategy of “speak[ing] as a fool” (2 Corinthians 11:23) by inhabiting and subverting the thought categories of his pragmatically self-interested worldly readers. His initial goal here is not to compel belief but to persuade readers to participate in a sacramental environment in which they can more readily be habituated into faith. Bunyan’s literary apologetic likewise draws on the model of St Paul and Bunyan’s imaginative fiction is a form of playing the fool which, like Pascal’s apologetic literary strategy, appropriates and reinscribes the thought categories of readers towards a vital faith.http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/4474John BunyanBlaise PascalChristian apologeticsimagination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Parry
spellingShingle David Parry
Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal
Etudes Epistémè
John Bunyan
Blaise Pascal
Christian apologetics
imagination
author_facet David Parry
author_sort David Parry
title Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal
title_short Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal
title_full Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal
title_fullStr Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal
title_full_unstemmed Playing the Fool: The Subversive Literary Apologetics of John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal
title_sort playing the fool: the subversive literary apologetics of john bunyan and blaise pascal
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
series Etudes Epistémè
issn 1634-0450
publishDate 2019-07-01
description John Bunyan and Blaise Pascal seem unlikely bedfellows – a fiercely Protestant English artisan with only vernacular literacy and a devoutly Catholic French polymath. Yet there are striking affinities between the two in their theologies, spiritual experience, and apologetic methodologies. Both believe that conversion requires divine intervention, yet both quote St Paul’s words Fides ex auditu / “Faith cometh by hearing” (Romans 10:17), thus involving human persuasion in conversion. Though both sometimes employ rational propositional arguments, both see rational argument as insufficient to change a person’s affections and will. Both Bunyan and Pascal adopt literary strategies of persuasion to faith that seek to bypass and subvert their readers’ cognitive defences. Pascal’s famous “wager” (pari) is often criticised for seeking to compel an impossible belief in something of which one is not persuaded. However, this criticism misconstrues the literary context. In this section of the Pensées, Pascal is speaking “selon les lumières naturelles” (“according to natural lights”), adopting St Paul’s rhetorical strategy of “speak[ing] as a fool” (2 Corinthians 11:23) by inhabiting and subverting the thought categories of his pragmatically self-interested worldly readers. His initial goal here is not to compel belief but to persuade readers to participate in a sacramental environment in which they can more readily be habituated into faith. Bunyan’s literary apologetic likewise draws on the model of St Paul and Bunyan’s imaginative fiction is a form of playing the fool which, like Pascal’s apologetic literary strategy, appropriates and reinscribes the thought categories of readers towards a vital faith.
topic John Bunyan
Blaise Pascal
Christian apologetics
imagination
url http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/4474
work_keys_str_mv AT davidparry playingthefoolthesubversiveliteraryapologeticsofjohnbunyanandblaisepascal
_version_ 1725178394028539904