NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems

In the last two decades, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) has been the most widely-used evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithm. However, its performance on a wide variety of many-objective test problems has not been examined in the literature. It has been i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lie Meng Pang, Hisao Ishibuchi, Ke Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9229403/
id doaj-aca1338f13cb46e284e0246d2a0f2212
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aca1338f13cb46e284e0246d2a0f22122021-03-30T04:53:35ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01819024019025010.1109/ACCESS.2020.30322409229403NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective ProblemsLie Meng Pang0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7037-1630Hisao Ishibuchi1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9186-6472Ke Shang2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-9504Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain-Inspired Intelligent Computation, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain-Inspired Intelligent Computation, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain-Inspired Intelligent Computation, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, ChinaIn the last two decades, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) has been the most widely-used evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithm. However, its performance on a wide variety of many-objective test problems has not been examined in the literature. It has been implicitly assumed by EMO researchers that NSGA-II does not work well on many-objective problems. As a result, NSGA-II has always been excluded from performance comparison with recently proposed many-objective EMO algorithms. Recently, it was pointed out that the performance of NSGA-II on many-objective problems is not always bad. In fact, the poor performance of NSGA-II on many-objective problems is mainly due to the existence of dominance resistant solutions. In this article, we show that the negative effect of the dominance resistant solutions can be remedied by slightly modifying objective values of many-objective problems in NSGA-II. Experimental results show that the modified NSGA-II works well on a wide variety of many-objective test problems.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9229403/Many-objective problemsdominance resistant solutionsevolutionary multi-objective optimizationNSGA-II
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lie Meng Pang
Hisao Ishibuchi
Ke Shang
spellingShingle Lie Meng Pang
Hisao Ishibuchi
Ke Shang
NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems
IEEE Access
Many-objective problems
dominance resistant solutions
evolutionary multi-objective optimization
NSGA-II
author_facet Lie Meng Pang
Hisao Ishibuchi
Ke Shang
author_sort Lie Meng Pang
title NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems
title_short NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems
title_full NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems
title_fullStr NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems
title_full_unstemmed NSGA-II With Simple Modification Works Well on a Wide Variety of Many-Objective Problems
title_sort nsga-ii with simple modification works well on a wide variety of many-objective problems
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In the last two decades, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) has been the most widely-used evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithm. However, its performance on a wide variety of many-objective test problems has not been examined in the literature. It has been implicitly assumed by EMO researchers that NSGA-II does not work well on many-objective problems. As a result, NSGA-II has always been excluded from performance comparison with recently proposed many-objective EMO algorithms. Recently, it was pointed out that the performance of NSGA-II on many-objective problems is not always bad. In fact, the poor performance of NSGA-II on many-objective problems is mainly due to the existence of dominance resistant solutions. In this article, we show that the negative effect of the dominance resistant solutions can be remedied by slightly modifying objective values of many-objective problems in NSGA-II. Experimental results show that the modified NSGA-II works well on a wide variety of many-objective test problems.
topic Many-objective problems
dominance resistant solutions
evolutionary multi-objective optimization
NSGA-II
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9229403/
work_keys_str_mv AT liemengpang nsgaiiwithsimplemodificationworkswellonawidevarietyofmanyobjectiveproblems
AT hisaoishibuchi nsgaiiwithsimplemodificationworkswellonawidevarietyofmanyobjectiveproblems
AT keshang nsgaiiwithsimplemodificationworkswellonawidevarietyofmanyobjectiveproblems
_version_ 1724181025965211648