Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign

BackgroundIn January 2014, the Chicago City Council scheduled a vote on local regulation of electronic cigarettes as tobacco products. One week prior to the vote, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) released a series of messages about electronic cigarettes (e-cigar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harris, Jenine K, Moreland-Russell, Sarah, Choucair, Bechara, Mansour, Raed, Staub, Mackenzie, Simmons, Kendall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2014-10-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:http://www.jmir.org/2014/10/e238/
id doaj-aca9cc8e2c484542b447a81f94c37a08
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aca9cc8e2c484542b447a81f94c37a082021-04-02T18:40:22ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712014-10-011610e23810.2196/jmir.3622Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter CampaignHarris, Jenine KMoreland-Russell, SarahChoucair, BecharaMansour, RaedStaub, MackenzieSimmons, Kendall BackgroundIn January 2014, the Chicago City Council scheduled a vote on local regulation of electronic cigarettes as tobacco products. One week prior to the vote, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) released a series of messages about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) through its Twitter account. Shortly after the messages, or tweets, were released, the department’s Twitter account became the target of a “Twitter bomb” by Twitter users sending more than 600 tweets in one week against the proposed regulation. ObjectiveThe purpose of our study was to examine the messages and tweet patterns in the social media response to the CDPH e-cigarette campaign. MethodsWe collected all tweets mentioning the CDPH in the week between the e-cigarette campaign and the vote on the new local e-cigarette policy. We conducted a content analysis of the tweets, used descriptive statistics to examine characteristics of involved Twitter users, and used network visualization and descriptive statistics to identify Twitter users prominent in the conversation. ResultsOf the 683 tweets mentioning CDPH during the week, 609 (89.2%) were anti-policy. More than half of anti-policy tweets were about use of electronic cigarettes for cessation as a healthier alternative to combustible cigarettes (358/609, 58.8%). Just over one-third of anti-policy tweets asserted that the health department was lying or disseminating propaganda (224/609, 36.8%). Approximately 14% (96/683, 14.1%) of the tweets used an account or included elements consistent with “astroturfing”—a strategy employed to promote a false sense of consensus around an idea. Few Twitter users were from the Chicago area; Twitter users from Chicago were significantly more likely than expected to tweet in support of the policy. ConclusionsOur findings may assist public health organizations to anticipate, recognize, and respond to coordinated social media campaigns.http://www.jmir.org/2014/10/e238/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harris, Jenine K
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Choucair, Bechara
Mansour, Raed
Staub, Mackenzie
Simmons, Kendall
spellingShingle Harris, Jenine K
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Choucair, Bechara
Mansour, Raed
Staub, Mackenzie
Simmons, Kendall
Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
Journal of Medical Internet Research
author_facet Harris, Jenine K
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Choucair, Bechara
Mansour, Raed
Staub, Mackenzie
Simmons, Kendall
author_sort Harris, Jenine K
title Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
title_short Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
title_full Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
title_fullStr Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
title_full_unstemmed Tweeting for and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign
title_sort tweeting for and against public health policy: response to the chicago department of public health's electronic cigarette twitter campaign
publisher JMIR Publications
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
issn 1438-8871
publishDate 2014-10-01
description BackgroundIn January 2014, the Chicago City Council scheduled a vote on local regulation of electronic cigarettes as tobacco products. One week prior to the vote, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) released a series of messages about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) through its Twitter account. Shortly after the messages, or tweets, were released, the department’s Twitter account became the target of a “Twitter bomb” by Twitter users sending more than 600 tweets in one week against the proposed regulation. ObjectiveThe purpose of our study was to examine the messages and tweet patterns in the social media response to the CDPH e-cigarette campaign. MethodsWe collected all tweets mentioning the CDPH in the week between the e-cigarette campaign and the vote on the new local e-cigarette policy. We conducted a content analysis of the tweets, used descriptive statistics to examine characteristics of involved Twitter users, and used network visualization and descriptive statistics to identify Twitter users prominent in the conversation. ResultsOf the 683 tweets mentioning CDPH during the week, 609 (89.2%) were anti-policy. More than half of anti-policy tweets were about use of electronic cigarettes for cessation as a healthier alternative to combustible cigarettes (358/609, 58.8%). Just over one-third of anti-policy tweets asserted that the health department was lying or disseminating propaganda (224/609, 36.8%). Approximately 14% (96/683, 14.1%) of the tweets used an account or included elements consistent with “astroturfing”—a strategy employed to promote a false sense of consensus around an idea. Few Twitter users were from the Chicago area; Twitter users from Chicago were significantly more likely than expected to tweet in support of the policy. ConclusionsOur findings may assist public health organizations to anticipate, recognize, and respond to coordinated social media campaigns.
url http://www.jmir.org/2014/10/e238/
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisjeninek tweetingforandagainstpublichealthpolicyresponsetothechicagodepartmentofpublichealthselectroniccigarettetwittercampaign
AT morelandrussellsarah tweetingforandagainstpublichealthpolicyresponsetothechicagodepartmentofpublichealthselectroniccigarettetwittercampaign
AT choucairbechara tweetingforandagainstpublichealthpolicyresponsetothechicagodepartmentofpublichealthselectroniccigarettetwittercampaign
AT mansourraed tweetingforandagainstpublichealthpolicyresponsetothechicagodepartmentofpublichealthselectroniccigarettetwittercampaign
AT staubmackenzie tweetingforandagainstpublichealthpolicyresponsetothechicagodepartmentofpublichealthselectroniccigarettetwittercampaign
AT simmonskendall tweetingforandagainstpublichealthpolicyresponsetothechicagodepartmentofpublichealthselectroniccigarettetwittercampaign
_version_ 1721551306870489088