Evaluation of Signature Erosion in Ebola Virus Due to Genomic Drift and Its Impact on the Performance of Diagnostic Assays

• Main Authors: Shanmuga Sozhamannan, Mitchell Y. Holland, Adrienne T. Hall, Daniel A. Negrón, Mychal Ivancich, Jeffrey W. Koehler, Timothy D. Minogue, Catherine E. Campbell, Walter J. Berger, George W. Christopher, Bruce G. Goodwin, Michael A. Smith
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2015-06-01
• Series: Viruses
• Subjects: EBOV; Western African outbreak; WGS; qRT-PCR; signature erosion; PSET; BioVelocity
• Online Access: http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/7/6/2763

Genome sequence analyses of the 2014 Ebola Virus (EBOV) isolates revealed a potential problem with the diagnostic assays currently in use; i.e., drifting genomic profiles of the virus may affect the sensitivity or even produce false-negative results. We evaluated signature erosion in ebolavirus molecular assays using an in silico approach and found frequent potential false-negative and false-positive results. We further empirically evaluated many EBOV assays, under real time PCR conditions using EBOV Kikwit (1995) and Makona (2014) RNA templates. These results revealed differences in performance between assays but were comparable between the old and new EBOV templates. Using a whole genome approach and a novel algorithm, termed BioVelocity, we identified new signatures that are unique to each of EBOV, Sudan virus (SUDV), and Reston virus (RESTV). Interestingly, many of the current assay signatures do not fall within these regions, indicating a potential drawback in the past assay design strategies. The new signatures identified in this study may be evaluated with real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) assay development and validation. In addition, we discuss regulatory implications and timely availability to impact a rapidly evolving outbreak using existing but perhaps less than optimal assays versus redesign these assays for addressing genomic changes.