Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory

Antibiotic intervention is an effective treatment strategy for many bacterial infections and liberates bacterial antigens and stimulatory products that can induce an inflammatory response. Despite the opportunity for bacterial killing to enhance the development of adaptive immunity, patients treated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph M. Benoun, Jasmine C. Labuda, Stephen J. McSorley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2016-12-01
Series:mBio
Online Access:http://mbio.asm.org/cgi/content/full/7/6/e01520-16
id doaj-ad5a078e15684d7c9a4db8e3eb85a4db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad5a078e15684d7c9a4db8e3eb85a4db2021-07-02T06:11:32ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologymBio2150-75112016-12-0176e01520-1610.1128/mBio.01520-16Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune MemoryJoseph M. BenounJasmine C. LabudaStephen J. McSorleyAntibiotic intervention is an effective treatment strategy for many bacterial infections and liberates bacterial antigens and stimulatory products that can induce an inflammatory response. Despite the opportunity for bacterial killing to enhance the development of adaptive immunity, patients treated successfully with antibiotics can suffer from reinfection. Studies in mouse models of Salmonella and Chlamydia infection also demonstrate that early antibiotic intervention reduces host protective immunity to subsequent infection. This heightened susceptibility to reinfection correlates with poor development of Th1 and antibody responses in antibiotic-treated mice but can be overcome by delayed antibiotic intervention, thus suggesting a requirement for sustained T cell stimulation for protection. Although the contribution of memory T cell subsets is imperfectly understood in both of these infection models, a protective role for noncirculating memory cells is suggested by recent studies. Together, these data propose a model where antibiotic treatment specifically interrupts tissue-resident memory T cell formation. Greater understanding of the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon might suggest therapeutic interventions to restore a protective memory response in antibiotic-treated patients, thus reducing the incidence of reinfection.http://mbio.asm.org/cgi/content/full/7/6/e01520-16
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph M. Benoun
Jasmine C. Labuda
Stephen J. McSorley
spellingShingle Joseph M. Benoun
Jasmine C. Labuda
Stephen J. McSorley
Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
mBio
author_facet Joseph M. Benoun
Jasmine C. Labuda
Stephen J. McSorley
author_sort Joseph M. Benoun
title Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
title_short Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
title_full Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
title_fullStr Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
title_full_unstemmed Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
title_sort collateral damage: detrimental effect of antibiotics on the development of protective immune memory
publisher American Society for Microbiology
series mBio
issn 2150-7511
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Antibiotic intervention is an effective treatment strategy for many bacterial infections and liberates bacterial antigens and stimulatory products that can induce an inflammatory response. Despite the opportunity for bacterial killing to enhance the development of adaptive immunity, patients treated successfully with antibiotics can suffer from reinfection. Studies in mouse models of Salmonella and Chlamydia infection also demonstrate that early antibiotic intervention reduces host protective immunity to subsequent infection. This heightened susceptibility to reinfection correlates with poor development of Th1 and antibody responses in antibiotic-treated mice but can be overcome by delayed antibiotic intervention, thus suggesting a requirement for sustained T cell stimulation for protection. Although the contribution of memory T cell subsets is imperfectly understood in both of these infection models, a protective role for noncirculating memory cells is suggested by recent studies. Together, these data propose a model where antibiotic treatment specifically interrupts tissue-resident memory T cell formation. Greater understanding of the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon might suggest therapeutic interventions to restore a protective memory response in antibiotic-treated patients, thus reducing the incidence of reinfection.
url http://mbio.asm.org/cgi/content/full/7/6/e01520-16
work_keys_str_mv AT josephmbenoun collateraldamagedetrimentaleffectofantibioticsonthedevelopmentofprotectiveimmunememory
AT jasmineclabuda collateraldamagedetrimentaleffectofantibioticsonthedevelopmentofprotectiveimmunememory
AT stephenjmcsorley collateraldamagedetrimentaleffectofantibioticsonthedevelopmentofprotectiveimmunememory
_version_ 1721337620846346240