Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations

Background Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristin Tormoehlen, Yvette J. Johnson-Walker, Emily W. Lankau, Maung San Myint, John A. Herrmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-02-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/6460.pdf
id doaj-ad981c8758fb4cde8196f6e40f007551
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ad981c8758fb4cde8196f6e40f0075512020-11-24T21:40:10ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-02-017e646010.7717/peerj.6460Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operationsKristin Tormoehlen0Yvette J. Johnson-Walker1Emily W. Lankau2Maung San Myint3John A. Herrmann4Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USADepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USADepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USADepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USADepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USABackground Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining environmental bacteria may vary among species because of physiologic or behavioral differences, complicating selection of a bacterial model that can accurately characterize microbial connections among hosts of interest. This study compares the prevalence and antibiotic resistance phenotypes of two potential model bacterial organisms isolated from wild birds and their environments. Methods We compared prevalence and resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species isolated from environmental swabs and bird feces on a residential control site, a confinement dairy, a pasture-based beef farm, and a confinement beef farm. Results Bird feces at all sites had low-to-moderate prevalence of Escherichia coli (range: 17–47%), despite potential for exposure on farms (range: 63–97%). Few Escherichia coli were isolated from the control environment. Enterococcus faecalis was dominant in birds at both beef farms (62% and 81% of Enterococcus isolates) and low-to-moderately prevalent at the dairy and control sites (29% and 23% of isolates, respectively). Antimicrobial resistance prevalence was higher in farm samples compared to those from the residential control, but distribution of resistant isolates varied between the bacterial genera. Birds on all farms carried resistant Enterococcus at similar rates to that of the environment, but resistance was less common in bird-associated Escherichia coli despite presence of resistant isolates in the farm environment. Discussion Bacterial species studied may affect how readily bacterial exchange among populations is detected. Selection of microbial models must carefully consider both the questions being posed and how findings might influence resulting management decisions.https://peerj.com/articles/6460.pdfAntimicrobial resistanceEnteric bacteriaWild birdsMicrobial ecologyTransmissionEscherichia coli
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kristin Tormoehlen
Yvette J. Johnson-Walker
Emily W. Lankau
Maung San Myint
John A. Herrmann
spellingShingle Kristin Tormoehlen
Yvette J. Johnson-Walker
Emily W. Lankau
Maung San Myint
John A. Herrmann
Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
PeerJ
Antimicrobial resistance
Enteric bacteria
Wild birds
Microbial ecology
Transmission
Escherichia coli
author_facet Kristin Tormoehlen
Yvette J. Johnson-Walker
Emily W. Lankau
Maung San Myint
John A. Herrmann
author_sort Kristin Tormoehlen
title Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_short Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_full Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_fullStr Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
title_sort considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Background Wild birds using livestock facilities for food and shelter may contribute to dissemination of enteric pathogens or antimicrobial resistant bacteria. However, drivers of microbial exchange among wildlife and livestock are not well characterized. Predisposition for acquiring and retaining environmental bacteria may vary among species because of physiologic or behavioral differences, complicating selection of a bacterial model that can accurately characterize microbial connections among hosts of interest. This study compares the prevalence and antibiotic resistance phenotypes of two potential model bacterial organisms isolated from wild birds and their environments. Methods We compared prevalence and resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species isolated from environmental swabs and bird feces on a residential control site, a confinement dairy, a pasture-based beef farm, and a confinement beef farm. Results Bird feces at all sites had low-to-moderate prevalence of Escherichia coli (range: 17–47%), despite potential for exposure on farms (range: 63–97%). Few Escherichia coli were isolated from the control environment. Enterococcus faecalis was dominant in birds at both beef farms (62% and 81% of Enterococcus isolates) and low-to-moderately prevalent at the dairy and control sites (29% and 23% of isolates, respectively). Antimicrobial resistance prevalence was higher in farm samples compared to those from the residential control, but distribution of resistant isolates varied between the bacterial genera. Birds on all farms carried resistant Enterococcus at similar rates to that of the environment, but resistance was less common in bird-associated Escherichia coli despite presence of resistant isolates in the farm environment. Discussion Bacterial species studied may affect how readily bacterial exchange among populations is detected. Selection of microbial models must carefully consider both the questions being posed and how findings might influence resulting management decisions.
topic Antimicrobial resistance
Enteric bacteria
Wild birds
Microbial ecology
Transmission
Escherichia coli
url https://peerj.com/articles/6460.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kristintormoehlen considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT yvettejjohnsonwalker considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT emilywlankau considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT maungsanmyint considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
AT johnaherrmann considerationsforstudyingtransmissionofantimicrobialresistantentericbacteriabetweenwildbirdsandtheenvironmentonintensivedairyandbeefcattleoperations
_version_ 1725927712321699840