Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary

The growing visibility of trans and gender-nonconforming individuals paved the way for a novel politics of transgender recognition in the legal sphere and state-governed public policies. Considering that the possibilities for registering multiple genders beyond male or female are taking effect in se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sofia Aboim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-09-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2820
id doaj-adbbfd6bc78a4e49b8ddb1398462d2ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adbbfd6bc78a4e49b8ddb1398462d2ca2020-11-25T03:34:20ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632020-09-018323124110.17645/pag.v8i3.28201642Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender BinarySofia Aboim0Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, PortugalThe growing visibility of trans and gender-nonconforming individuals paved the way for a novel politics of transgender recognition in the legal sphere and state-governed public policies. Considering that the possibilities for registering multiple genders beyond male or female are taking effect in several countries, this article examines recent developments and claims that recognition is complicit with misrecognition for two main reasons. Firstly, because models of recognition tend to equalize all the interactions and all the fields of social life. Drawing on Axel Honneth’s notion of spheres of recognition, I argue that inasmuch as different forms of recognition (legal, moral, affective) are governed by different norms and gender regimes, the dynamics of recognition produce misrecognition. Secondly, because legal and institutional recognition tends to reify individual identity. Drawing on Nancy Fraser’s critique of the identity model of recognition, I contend that the identity recognition model tends to impose a norm rather than recognizing diversity. Therefore, gender identity categories can—through a process of reification—block the entitlement to affirm one’s self-determined gender identity. The paradoxical dynamics of recognition are empirically illustrated through an analysis of third-gender markers and their effects upon the lives and narratives of trans and gender-nonconforming individuals. By examining the case of Nepal in comparative perspective with other developments in Asia and South America, it is demonstrated that the identity model of recognition is complicit with feelings and practices of misrecognition.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2820genderidentity politicsmisrecognitionnepalnon-binary gendersthird-gender markerstrans
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sofia Aboim
spellingShingle Sofia Aboim
Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary
Politics and Governance
gender
identity politics
misrecognition
nepal
non-binary genders
third-gender markers
trans
author_facet Sofia Aboim
author_sort Sofia Aboim
title Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary
title_short Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary
title_full Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary
title_fullStr Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary
title_full_unstemmed Gender in a Box? The Paradoxes of Recognition beyond the Gender Binary
title_sort gender in a box? the paradoxes of recognition beyond the gender binary
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2020-09-01
description The growing visibility of trans and gender-nonconforming individuals paved the way for a novel politics of transgender recognition in the legal sphere and state-governed public policies. Considering that the possibilities for registering multiple genders beyond male or female are taking effect in several countries, this article examines recent developments and claims that recognition is complicit with misrecognition for two main reasons. Firstly, because models of recognition tend to equalize all the interactions and all the fields of social life. Drawing on Axel Honneth’s notion of spheres of recognition, I argue that inasmuch as different forms of recognition (legal, moral, affective) are governed by different norms and gender regimes, the dynamics of recognition produce misrecognition. Secondly, because legal and institutional recognition tends to reify individual identity. Drawing on Nancy Fraser’s critique of the identity model of recognition, I contend that the identity recognition model tends to impose a norm rather than recognizing diversity. Therefore, gender identity categories can—through a process of reification—block the entitlement to affirm one’s self-determined gender identity. The paradoxical dynamics of recognition are empirically illustrated through an analysis of third-gender markers and their effects upon the lives and narratives of trans and gender-nonconforming individuals. By examining the case of Nepal in comparative perspective with other developments in Asia and South America, it is demonstrated that the identity model of recognition is complicit with feelings and practices of misrecognition.
topic gender
identity politics
misrecognition
nepal
non-binary genders
third-gender markers
trans
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2820
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiaaboim genderinaboxtheparadoxesofrecognitionbeyondthegenderbinary
_version_ 1724559361287651328