No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand

Abstract Background Alteration in the gut microbiota has been proposed in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) pathogenesis, especially in the diarrheal type (IBS-D). We conducted this study to evaluate the fecal microbiota in Thai IBS-D patients when compared with healthy subjects as well as to evaluate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sawangpong Jandee, Suppana Chuensakul, Suppasil Maneerat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:Gut Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00406-8
id doaj-adda8a974aa649a498cd8b89c38d2b78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-adda8a974aa649a498cd8b89c38d2b782021-03-11T11:54:49ZengBMCGut Pathogens1757-47492021-03-011311910.1186/s13099-021-00406-8No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in ThailandSawangpong Jandee0Suppana Chuensakul1Suppasil Maneerat2Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan UniversityBiotechnology for Bioresource Utilization Laboratory, Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla UniversityAbstract Background Alteration in the gut microbiota has been proposed in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) pathogenesis, especially in the diarrheal type (IBS-D). We conducted this study to evaluate the fecal microbiota in Thai IBS-D patients when compared with healthy subjects as well as to evaluate the effects of probiotics on changes in the gut microbiota correlated with symptoms. Methods A matched case–control study was conducted on diagnosed IBS-D patients, based on the Rome IV criteria and healthy controls. Stool samples were collected in preservation tubes. Bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid extraction was performed and amplified. Next, 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid genes sequencing was performed to identify the microbiome in both the groups. IBS-D patients were provided with a probiotic mixture that was rich in Lactobacillus acidophillus and Bifidobacterium bifidum over 8 weeks. Changes in the symptoms, stool characteristics, and fecal microbiota were evaluated and compared with the corresponding baseline values. Results Twenty IBS-D patients with 20 age and gender-matched controls were included in this study. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the groups, including the mode of birth and the history of breastfeeding in infancy. No significant difference was noted in the fecal microbiota between the IBS-D patients and controls. The IBS symptom severity scales (IBS-SSS) were not statistically different after probiotic prescription; although, the bowel movements, the sense of urgency to go to the toilet and passing of mucous stool had obviously decreased. No change was noted in the fecal microbiota after receiving the experimental probiotic, except for an increase in the proportion of B. bifidum. Conclusion Alteration in the gut microbiota composition was probably not the main pathogenic mechanism in the Thai IBS-D patients assessed in this study. However, modifying microbiomes with potentially protective bacteria seems to be a beneficial therapy. Thai Clinical trial registry: TCTR20191211006, Date of registration: 10 Dec 2019. Retrospectively registered, Clinical trial URL: www.clinicaltrials.in.thhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00406-8DiarrheaIrritable bowel syndromeMicrobiotaProbiotic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sawangpong Jandee
Suppana Chuensakul
Suppasil Maneerat
spellingShingle Sawangpong Jandee
Suppana Chuensakul
Suppasil Maneerat
No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand
Gut Pathogens
Diarrhea
Irritable bowel syndrome
Microbiota
Probiotic
author_facet Sawangpong Jandee
Suppana Chuensakul
Suppasil Maneerat
author_sort Sawangpong Jandee
title No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand
title_short No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand
title_full No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand
title_fullStr No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed No distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in Thailand
title_sort no distinction in the gut microbiota between diarrhea predominant-irritable bowel syndrome and healthy subjects: matched case–control study in thailand
publisher BMC
series Gut Pathogens
issn 1757-4749
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background Alteration in the gut microbiota has been proposed in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) pathogenesis, especially in the diarrheal type (IBS-D). We conducted this study to evaluate the fecal microbiota in Thai IBS-D patients when compared with healthy subjects as well as to evaluate the effects of probiotics on changes in the gut microbiota correlated with symptoms. Methods A matched case–control study was conducted on diagnosed IBS-D patients, based on the Rome IV criteria and healthy controls. Stool samples were collected in preservation tubes. Bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid extraction was performed and amplified. Next, 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid genes sequencing was performed to identify the microbiome in both the groups. IBS-D patients were provided with a probiotic mixture that was rich in Lactobacillus acidophillus and Bifidobacterium bifidum over 8 weeks. Changes in the symptoms, stool characteristics, and fecal microbiota were evaluated and compared with the corresponding baseline values. Results Twenty IBS-D patients with 20 age and gender-matched controls were included in this study. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the groups, including the mode of birth and the history of breastfeeding in infancy. No significant difference was noted in the fecal microbiota between the IBS-D patients and controls. The IBS symptom severity scales (IBS-SSS) were not statistically different after probiotic prescription; although, the bowel movements, the sense of urgency to go to the toilet and passing of mucous stool had obviously decreased. No change was noted in the fecal microbiota after receiving the experimental probiotic, except for an increase in the proportion of B. bifidum. Conclusion Alteration in the gut microbiota composition was probably not the main pathogenic mechanism in the Thai IBS-D patients assessed in this study. However, modifying microbiomes with potentially protective bacteria seems to be a beneficial therapy. Thai Clinical trial registry: TCTR20191211006, Date of registration: 10 Dec 2019. Retrospectively registered, Clinical trial URL: www.clinicaltrials.in.th
topic Diarrhea
Irritable bowel syndrome
Microbiota
Probiotic
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00406-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sawangpongjandee nodistinctioninthegutmicrobiotabetweendiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeandhealthysubjectsmatchedcasecontrolstudyinthailand
AT suppanachuensakul nodistinctioninthegutmicrobiotabetweendiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeandhealthysubjectsmatchedcasecontrolstudyinthailand
AT suppasilmaneerat nodistinctioninthegutmicrobiotabetweendiarrheapredominantirritablebowelsyndromeandhealthysubjectsmatchedcasecontrolstudyinthailand
_version_ 1724225101599080448