Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection

Abstract Introduction Sublobar resection has been widely accepted for treating pure ground-glass opacities (GGOs). As GGOs have good prognosis, preserving postoperative pulmonary function is the major concern in surgery. No studies have yet compared the success rates of pulmonary function reservatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taobo Luo, Qixun Chen, Jian Zeng, Lei Cai, Xiancong Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01610-y
id doaj-ae15a5af35c042deb36fed7626c2c61a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae15a5af35c042deb36fed7626c2c61a2021-09-19T11:47:58ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902021-09-0116112110.1186/s13019-021-01610-yPeripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resectionTaobo Luo0Qixun Chen1Jian Zeng2Lei Cai3Xiancong Huang4Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)Abstract Introduction Sublobar resection has been widely accepted for treating pure ground-glass opacities (GGOs). As GGOs have good prognosis, preserving postoperative pulmonary function is the major concern in surgery. No studies have yet compared the success rates of pulmonary function reservation between segmentectomy and wedge resection. Method The three-dimensional rebuild of computed tomography (CT) images was performed, the segmentectomy and wedge resection of the GGO in the target segment were simulated, and the area of cut surface was measured, which was important data for successful postoperative pulmonary recruitment maneuvers. Result With equal volumes of tissue removed, segmentectomy and wedge resection showed similar surface area loss for RS4 and RS5, followed by LS7 + 8, LS6 and LS1 + 2 segments. Compared with other segments, wedge resection performed in RS10, LS3, LS10, RS9 and RS7 may lead to a loss of lot more surface area than segmentectomy. Conclusion Wedge resection is suggested for segments RS4, RS5, LS1 + 2 and LS7 + 8, whereas segmentectomy is advised for segments RS1, LS4 + 5 and RS2. Meanwhile, deep wedge resection should be avoided for segments RS8, RS7, RS10, LS3, LS10. RS9 and LS9, in order to preserve a larger lung surface area.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01610-yPeripheral ground-glass opacitySegmentectomyWedge resectionSurface area
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taobo Luo
Qixun Chen
Jian Zeng
Lei Cai
Xiancong Huang
spellingShingle Taobo Luo
Qixun Chen
Jian Zeng
Lei Cai
Xiancong Huang
Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Peripheral ground-glass opacity
Segmentectomy
Wedge resection
Surface area
author_facet Taobo Luo
Qixun Chen
Jian Zeng
Lei Cai
Xiancong Huang
author_sort Taobo Luo
title Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
title_short Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
title_full Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
title_fullStr Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
title_sort peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
issn 1749-8090
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Introduction Sublobar resection has been widely accepted for treating pure ground-glass opacities (GGOs). As GGOs have good prognosis, preserving postoperative pulmonary function is the major concern in surgery. No studies have yet compared the success rates of pulmonary function reservation between segmentectomy and wedge resection. Method The three-dimensional rebuild of computed tomography (CT) images was performed, the segmentectomy and wedge resection of the GGO in the target segment were simulated, and the area of cut surface was measured, which was important data for successful postoperative pulmonary recruitment maneuvers. Result With equal volumes of tissue removed, segmentectomy and wedge resection showed similar surface area loss for RS4 and RS5, followed by LS7 + 8, LS6 and LS1 + 2 segments. Compared with other segments, wedge resection performed in RS10, LS3, LS10, RS9 and RS7 may lead to a loss of lot more surface area than segmentectomy. Conclusion Wedge resection is suggested for segments RS4, RS5, LS1 + 2 and LS7 + 8, whereas segmentectomy is advised for segments RS1, LS4 + 5 and RS2. Meanwhile, deep wedge resection should be avoided for segments RS8, RS7, RS10, LS3, LS10. RS9 and LS9, in order to preserve a larger lung surface area.
topic Peripheral ground-glass opacity
Segmentectomy
Wedge resection
Surface area
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01610-y
work_keys_str_mv AT taoboluo peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection
AT qixunchen peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection
AT jianzeng peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection
AT leicai peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection
AT xianconghuang peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection
_version_ 1717375534580629504